Re: [Arm-netbook] EOMA68 cards @ 92.4%

On 07/31/2016 05:56 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Wolfgang Romey wrote: >> Am Sonntag, 31. Juli 2016, 16:39:57 schrieb Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton: >>> oops 404 not found, odd >> >> Maybe you have not used the complete link

Re: [Arm-netbook] 248 cards

On 08/04/2016 06:05 PM, Xavi Drudis Ferran wrote: > Then there's the crowdfunding goal, which is further ahead, but the > cards' MOQ is already something. I guess there are MOQs for the other > rewards too ? > What about the completely assembled laptops? The campaign seems to be past 250. I

Re: [Arm-netbook] Logging and journaling

On 02/10/2017 10:37 AM, Elena ``of Valhalla'' wrote: > Running GNOME without systemd is a different beast: I don't know if it > has happened already, but sooner or later systemd will be required > because of an *upstream* decision. > Debian fully supports a number of other Desktop Environment and

Re: [Arm-netbook] Verifying firmware

On 08/24/2016 11:31 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Bonjour, > > Le Tue, 23 Aug 2016 19:50:30 +0200 > Henrik Nordström a écrit: > >> sön 2016-08-21 klockan 21:55 +0100 skrev Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton: >> From a security point of view, open source code > > I

Re: [Arm-netbook] Why Free hardware fails

On 08/24/2016 09:51 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > well... we have 1571 backers so far (and climbing) so i think we'll do okay. > You mean 1571 pledges? (Well, 1791 by now.) The number of backers is probably less because probably most people have pledged for at least two items. By

Re: [Arm-netbook] brief update

On 09/19/2016 12:38 PM, mike.v...@gmail.com wrote: > Still on low speed machines try to avoid swap to any medium. All will get > very slow; I/O contention. Memory usually has it's separate/private > bus/tracs/connection. The rest, Network, Sata, USB, GPIO, SPI etc. shares a > common bus. > Swap

Re: [Arm-netbook] Code of conduct?

On 09/20/2016 11:58 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 9:30 AM, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) > <pelzflor...@pelzflorian.de> wrote: >>>> For example, Wikipedia >>>> has a hierarchy. It may not be perfect, but I doubt it would work &g

Re: [Arm-netbook] Code of conduct?

On 09/20/2016 09:36 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 1:19 PM, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) > <pelzflor...@pelzflorian.de> wrote: >> I’m not talking about precise, high-level duties / implementation >> details but more generally about

Re: [Arm-netbook] Future case idea: subnotebook/PDA with QWERTY keyboard

On 09/22/2016 07:33 AM, Joseph Honold wrote: > On 09/21/2016 10:46 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: >>> In a case where a housing is designed to be a router, if I plug my A20 cpu >>> card that ships with a desktop gui OS, it is in no way configured to be >>> usable as a router. >> >>

Re: [Arm-netbook] Code of conduct?

On 09/17/2016 04:08 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Sam Pablo Kuper > wrote: >> Does anyone else here think it would be, on balance, a good idea to >> adopt a Code of Conduct, perhaps based on the Contributor Covenant[0], >> for

Re: [Arm-netbook] Code of conduct?

On 09/17/2016 11:52 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:06 AM, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) > <pelzflor...@pelzflorian.de> wrote: >> It directly references skin color, religion etc. and >> the term SJW clearly is about these -isms. Sexism et

Re: [Arm-netbook] Code of conduct?

On 09/22/2016 01:39 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > --- > crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68 > > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 7:53 AM, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) > <pelzflor...@pelzflorian.de> wrote: > >> Yes, I c

Re: [Arm-netbook] Why Free hardware fails

On 08/25/2016 05:29 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > 1846 and climing (yay!) just looking at the numbers it's 1450 actual > unique backers. which is awesome. > Unique orders or really unique backers, as in unique delivery addresses? I have placed new orders when I thought of new uses

Re: [Arm-netbook] Why Free hardware fails

On 08/25/2016 09:17 PM, Xavi Drudis Ferran wrote: > I don't deny this, but what it's harder to believe for me is that a > government organization buys in a crowfunding campaign. So this may > come soon, but not yet. > I wanted to mention this as an idea for the future. EU government

Re: [Arm-netbook] CE markings

I’ve been told said colleague needed to have the electronics shipped to another EU country first before it could go to Germany without customs checking for a CE marking. Well, I don’t know if that’s actually true. I hope this won’t cause problems. I have no knowledge about CE markings. Regards,

[Arm-netbook] CE markings

A colleague of a friend of mine had problems getting some electronics without CE marking through customs. Let me ask just to be on the safe side: I presume the EOMA68-A20 and casings will have CE markings as appropriate? Regards, Florian ___

Re: [Arm-netbook] Certification Mark: My hat in the Ring

The EOMA logo making a statement about anything other than EOMA does not seem like a good idea to me. ___ arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to

Re: [Arm-netbook] Technoethical - a good-looking seller of HW with Libre SW & firmware (Technoethical holds RYF certification)

On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 06:57:32AM -0400, zap wrote: > On 07/06/2017 06:04 AM, dumblob wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I just came across Technoethical (https://tehnoetic.com/ ) and was > > surprised by the range of libre products they sell. Technoethical is > > also RYF (https://ryf.fsf.org/ ) certified.

Re: [Arm-netbook] Totally derailed topic

On 04/24/2017 02:10 PM, Lyberta wrote: > […] > > But I never gave up. As long as I'm alive, I want to kill people. If I > get a gun and go on a killing spree, I would be the life worth living. > > […] I’d suggest that you do some science to improve understanding of your condition or that you

[Arm-netbook] Pangea Electronics

Hi, I told someone about EOMA68. When they Google searched for “modular laptop“ in German, they got this: http://pangeaelectronics.com/EN/index.html I don’t know what you think of that or if they would care about EOMA. To me the Web site looks more like they are interested in vendor lock-in,

Re: [Arm-netbook] Conflict-free minerals

On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 01:15:06AM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > many people have pointed > out however a flaw in this logic, that copyright is a civil offense > not a criminal offense. > Actually I’m not so sure depending on the jurisdiction:

Re: [Arm-netbook] Alt Webpage & Logo Combo

On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 10:05:50AM -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > On Wednesday, January 31, 2018 12:46:37 PM Alexander Ross wrote: > > http://rhombus-tech.aross.me/webpagealt/ > > ... > > > I combined to logos people made and also made some little mods of my > > own. i feel quite happy with

Re: [Arm-netbook] Alt Webpage & Logo Combo

On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 09:02:10AM -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > I guess it could be: >* our eyes trained differently >* our eyes function differently--I have astigmatism, but it is corrected > by > my glasses so I don't think that is a factor >* different tools on our computers

Re: [Arm-netbook] Alt Webpage & Logo Combo

On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 01:23:58PM -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > On Saturday, February 03, 2018 11:10:06 AM pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 09:02:10AM -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > > > I guess it could be: > > >* o

Re: [Arm-netbook] Questioning The Holy War

On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 11:22:33PM -0500, Christopher Havel wrote: > Yet, almost every message on this list seems to carry with it the > implication -- if not express statement -- that if a given application > can't be openly audited on a remarkably low level by a random layperson at > a random

Re: [Arm-netbook] Questioning The Holy War

On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 11:19:43AM -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote: > On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 10:28:18AM -0500, Chris Tyler wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 7:07 AM Pablo Rath wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 04:52:22PM -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 12:59:44PM