Re: [Arm-netbook] A suggestion why Systemd may be bad

2017-02-16 Thread Philip Hands
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton writes: > if systemd is so bloated and all-encompassing that it in effect > demands *all* privileges (it doesn't, but you know what i mean), it > utterly defeats the object of having the security system in the first > place. This appears to be another instance of yo

Re: [Arm-netbook] A suggestion why Systemd may be bad

2017-02-16 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
--- crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68 On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Philip Hands wrote: > Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton writes: > >> if systemd is so bloated and all-encompassing that it in effect >> demands *all* privileges (it doesn't, but you know wha

Re: [Arm-netbook] A suggestion why Systemd may be bad

2017-02-16 Thread Philip Hands
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton writes: > --- > crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68 > > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Philip Hands wrote: >> Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton writes: >> >>> if systemd is so bloated and all-encompassing that it in effect >>> dem

Re: [Arm-netbook] A suggestion why Systemd may be bad

2017-02-16 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Philip Hands wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Philip Hands wrote: > I'm not trying to knock down skittles -- I'm trying to see whether what > you're saying has any substance behind it, or is simply hand waving. one of the things that i am learning -

Re: [Arm-netbook] A suggestion why Systemd may be bad

2017-02-16 Thread zap
On 02/16/2017 06:06 AM, Philip Hands wrote: > Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton writes: > >> --- >> crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68 >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Philip Hands wrote: >>> Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton writes: >>> if systemd is