Re: [Arm-netbook] Totally derailed topic

Hendrik Boom: > But i have noticed that, true or false, a lot of people are helped by > belief in God. So the scientific question becomes, what is it that > actually helps them if God does not exist?? Well, I have found that critical thinking is the most important thing for consciousness. If

Re: [Arm-netbook] Totally derailed topic

On 2017-05-11 at 06:57:00 +, Lyberta wrote: > Believing in religion is like buying Apple's iPhone. Sure, it's shiny, > it has apps, you may feel good about yourself. But most people don't > understand how much they sacrifice by using it. Like downloading apps > not from Apple Store or not be

Re: [Arm-netbook] Totally derailed topic

On Wed, 10 May 2017 17:46:23 +0100 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > now that i think about it, i believe i heard of something about 20 > years ago called the humanist society (or something like that). > apparently they live their lives according to a really quite [humane]

Re: [Arm-netbook] list posting etiquette

--- crowd-funded eco-conscious hardware: https://www.crowdsupply.com/eoma68 On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 1:30 AM, Hendrik Boom wrote: > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 07:38:22PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: >> >> awww! i quite _like_ the horrendous straying

Re: [Arm-netbook] Totally derailed topic

2017-05-11 0:44 GMT+02:00 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton : > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:23 PM, zap wrote: > > > it is sad because they think they will be rewarded at the end. But they > > already have their temporary very short term reward. Though they

[Arm-netbook] early access EOMA68 to hardware for parabola ARM maintainers?

(I sent this message before, but I suspect it didn't get delivered because I wasn't subscribed to the mailing list, so here I go again.) Hello everyone, I represent the hackers in charge of maintaining the parabola ARM port. As you know, the 'libre tea' computer card will be shipped with

Re: [Arm-netbook] Totally derailed topic

Elena ``of Valhalla'': > > Well, some people have faith, and they don't have a choice in having it > or not. Personally I feel it's like having another sense like smell: > imprecise, prone to misunderstanding, but it's there and those who have > it cannot deny that they feel something. Well, I

Re: [Arm-netbook] early access EOMA68 to hardware for parabola ARM maintainers?

> > Yes Luke has a list somewhere for devs who want early access on his site. > > Correct. I'm going to save you the time to search the vast archive of > the arm-netbook mailing list: Thank you very much! > *Begin of shortened quote* > "Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 03:49:59 + > From: Luke

Re: [Arm-netbook] GR8 based EOMA68 card

>Wouldn't the PCMCIA card thickness be an issue when using a CPU module? According to the mechanical drawing on page 32 of the v1.0 GR8 datasheet the SoM is at maximum 1.12mm thick. This should fit nicely inside even the 3.5mm typeI EOMA68 case.

Re: [Arm-netbook] Totally derailed topic

On Wed, 10 May 2017 23:44:29 +0100 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:23 PM, zap wrote: > > > it is sad because they think they will be rewarded at the end. But they > > already have their temporary very short term reward.

Re: [Arm-netbook] Side-Topic: Liberating PocketCHIP

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 05:05:20PM +0200, mike.v...@gmail.com wrote: > 2017-05-10 16:38 GMT+02:00 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton : > > > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Pablo wrote: > > > > > With any non-Chip-kernel you will lose NAND support. > > > So you can

Re: [Arm-netbook] Solid wood corner prototype

On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Tor, the Marqueteur wrote: > I never got a reply to this message, and seeing you ready to send the > microdesktop PCB to production, I thought I ought to make sure you saw > it, Luke. i did see it - i either replied or decided

Re: [Arm-netbook] early access EOMA68 to hardware for parabola ARM maintainers?

> >Hence my question: would be possible for us to get early access to a > >couple of the EOMA68 devices in advance, so that we can make sure that > >our ARM port is up and running when the cards are to be shipped? On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 11:41:34AM +0300, Allan Mwenda wrote: > Yes Luke has a list

Re: [Arm-netbook] early access EOMA68 to hardware for parabola ARM maintainers?

Put in as many people as would be useful to your project. No other distro has come here with interest like you guys so I'd take advantage of that before it changes. Didn't you have guys working on a handheld eoma console? Get them in on it as well. On 11 May 2017 18:34:01 GMT+03:00, Andreas

Re: [Arm-netbook] list posting etiquette

Just some thoughts ... If the topic changes, starting a new thread is better than just changing the subject line, as I may not be interested in the topic that starts the thread, but if only the subject line changes and the thread doesn't change, my threaded e-mail client will usually delete

Re: [Arm-netbook] GR8 based EOMA68 card

Wouldn't the PCMCIA card thickness be an issue when using a CPU module? On 05/11/2017 07:05 AM, Ismo Väänänen wrote: Hello, The recent talk about de-blobbing R8 and thus also GR8 inspired me to do a quick write up on how I see a Next Thing Co. GR8 System-In-Package chip being used in an

Re: [Arm-netbook] Solid wood corner prototype

I never got a reply to this message, and seeing you ready to send the microdesktop PCB to production, I thought I ought to make sure you saw it, Luke. On 30/04/17 18:36, Tor, the Marqueteur wrote: > On 30/04/17 17:47, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: >> i was just thinking, if you had the

Re: [Arm-netbook] Side-Topic: Liberating PocketCHIP

> Ah, interesting. Thank you for the correction and additional input. > I would be glad to be wrong here as it makes things so much easier. > My knowledge is quite vague in this area and comes mainly from > NextThings user forum. For example consider the following threads: If you want sound