Re: [Arm-netbook] Libre RISC-V -- I mean OpenPower M-Class GPU update

2020-01-01 Thread David Niklas
On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 23:02:51 + Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On 12/31/19, David Niklas wrote: > > > Maybe I have not been clear, how does signing an agreement or joining > > UC "vet" people? > > I always thought that my code/schematics vetted me as a fool or a wise > > man. > > it's

Re: [Arm-netbook] Libre RISC-V -- I mean OpenPower M-Class GPU update

2020-01-01 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
On 1/1/20, David Niklas wrote: > On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 23:02:51 + > Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: >> On 12/31/19, David Niklas wrote: >> >> > Maybe I have not been clear, how does signing an agreement or joining >> > UC "vet" people? >> > I always thought that my code/schematics vetted

Re: [Arm-netbook] Libre RISC-V -- I mean OpenPower M-Class GPU update

2020-01-01 Thread Paul Boddie
On 2020-01-01 22:09, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: the collaboration that is in place, and which is otherwise successfully taking place, is taking place behind *closed doors*, where we, as Libre Businesses, are told, basically, "sign this agreement which entirely compromises your business

[Arm-netbook] about Risc-V and Power,

2020-01-01 Thread zap
Isn't Risc-V supposedly  supposed to be more secure and isn't open power based on the old risc? I am just wondering, if the level of evils risc-v has done, justifies abandoning usage of it when you could just as easily do some risc-v processors with or without their help and moreover, power,

Re: [Arm-netbook] Libre RISC-V -- I mean OpenPower M-Class GPU update

2020-01-01 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
On 1/1/20, Paul Boddie wrote: > On 2020-01-01 22:09, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: >> >> the collaboration that is in place, and which is otherwise >> successfully taking place, is taking place behind *closed doors*, >> where we, as Libre Businesses, are told, basically, "sign this >>

Re: [Arm-netbook] about Risc-V and Power,

2020-01-01 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
On 1/2/20, zap wrote: > Isn't Risc-V supposedly supposed to be more secure and isn't open power > based on the old risc? I am just wondering, if the level of evils risc-v > has done, justifies abandoning usage of it when you could just as easily > do some risc-v processors with or without their

Re: [Arm-netbook] about Risc-V and Power,

2020-01-01 Thread zap
On 01/01/2020 11:07 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On 1/2/20, zap wrote: >> Isn't Risc-V supposedly supposed to be more secure and isn't open power >> based on the old risc? I am just wondering, if the level of evils risc-v >> has done, justifies abandoning usage of it when you