On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 04:55 PM, Fred Foldvary wrote:
--- Grey Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
First off, if "macro" is at all close to a "science",
there should be near unanimity, among macro "experts",
Is there unanimity among anthropologists and biologists and physicists
and
me
Thanks for the link about Slate, but there is something fairly annoying.
Lott claims:
" >> In 98 percent of the cases, such polls show, people simply brandish the weapon to
stop an attack.<<"
Tim Noah, disputes this, yet also FAILS to say what the polls do show.
"But polls by the Los Angeles Ti
Two last comments on the Lott business. First, there is a reasonably good
summary by Tim Noah in Slate,
http://slate.msn.com/id/2078084/
Second, a private email pointed out that in my deeply cynical post on Lott,
my reference to the Lott discussion was about the whole dispute, much of it
on web l
Hi,
I have a query/problem about China's
stats and with all the stats that come out during Bull/"expansionary" phases of
any economy. This was one of the phenomenons explained by John Kenneth Galbraith
using the US as an example.
It goes as follows. If I give you a loan
/invest which
john hull wrote:
BTW, the person who called De Soto's book an
"intellectual swindle" gave it three stars.
Joe Bob Briggs seems to give every movie three stars.
--
Anton Sherwood, http://www.ogre.nu/
