RE: Summer reruns

2000-07-10 Thread Yesim Yilmaz
> > > 3- The fact that the marginal cost of re-runs is zero (or very > near) is also > important. (As a side note, one should probably consider that advertising > revenues might be higher for new programming; but the question of > whether a > new episode of is worth more than a > re-run of is

Re: Summer reruns

2000-07-10 Thread michael gilson de lemos
Also, a lot of folks don't like to work in the summer.Especially in CA. Best Regards, MG been averse > to > >breaking the tradition and producing more original content in the summer > to > >capture market share from their rivals? > > > >R.J. Lehmann > >Retail Editor > >Travel Weekly > >(201) 902

Re: Summer reruns

2000-07-10 Thread Brian Moore
Didn't some of the newer networks (FOX and UPN) experiment with new episodes year-round in their early years? -Original Message- From: Lehmann, Ray (CTG) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Monday, July 10, 2000 2:07 PM Subject: Summ

Summer reruns

2000-07-10 Thread Lehmann, Ray (CTG)
eir summer hiatus. Which causes me to wonder how it is that the tradition of "summer reruns" has managed to last so long. Why have the networks apparently been averse to breaking the tradition and producing more original content in the summer to capture market share from their rivals?