Re: [ARMedslack] libflashplayer

2012-07-02 Thread Stuart Winter
> What else could it be ? Dunno but you can try with the new -current updates once I push them out this week. ___ ARMedslack mailing list ARMedslack@lists.armedslack.org http://lists.armedslack.org/mailman/listinfo/armedslack

Re: [ARMedslack] libflashplayer

2012-07-02 Thread John O'Donnell
On 07/01/2012 06:25 AM, Ottavio Caruso wrote: On 1 July 2012 08:42, Davide wrote: Maybe the version of libflashplayer.so is incompatible with firefox 13 or maybe there is some other issue with the mesa package on current. Am I missing something? While modern Android OS may share the same kern

Re: [ARMedslack] libflashplayer

2012-07-02 Thread Davide
>>> available in source code I don't see why people can assume one can >>> just drop libflashplayer.so for Android and expect it to work and even >>> if it did you'd open a can of worms. >>It does work - I tested it.  I suspect it doesn't work for Davide because >>the library is compiled for a CPU

Re: [ARMedslack] libflashplayer

2012-07-02 Thread Davide
>> available in source code I don't see why people can assume one can >> just drop libflashplayer.so for Android and expect it to work and even >> if it did you'd open a can of worms. >It does work - I tested it.  I suspect it doesn't work for Davide because >the library is compiled for a CPU hi