On Jul 4, 2012 18:47 "Thorsten Mühlfelder" wrote:
> Am Wed, 4 Jul 2012 14:51:29 +0100 (BST)
> schrieb Davide :
>
> > why the hell should one use flash for authentication on a web site
> > (on some sites if you don't have flash you cannot even see the box
> > for typing the authentication) !
>
>
Am Wed, 4 Jul 2012 14:51:29 +0100 (BST)
schrieb Davide :
> why the hell should one use flash for authentication on a web site
> (on some sites if you don't have flash you cannot even see the box
> for typing the authentication) !
I've never seen that and actually it's kind of funny nowadays. I gu
Am Wed, 4 Jul 2012 09:03:22 -0600
schrieb Old Man :
> Chrome on ARM is just an android package:
> https://www.google.com/intl/en/chrome/browser/mobile/android.html#utm_campaign=en&utm_source=en-ha-na-us-bk&utm_medium=ha
No, it should be possible to build "real" chromium on ARMed Slack and
run it
Chrome on ARM is just an android package:
https://www.google.com/intl/en/chrome/browser/mobile/android.html#utm_campaign=en&utm_source=en-ha-na-us-bk&utm_medium=ha
At this point you'd be writing an android emulator. Not that it's a bad idea
though, just a difficult one.
On Jul 4, 2012, at 8:11
On 4 July 2012 15:03, Davide wrote:
> Can chrome/chromium run on armedslack and not loose the flash support ?
I am not aware of Chrome/Chromium running on ARM at all.
The problem is in the hardware, not the software. Adobe will pay their
developers to develop on 'certified' architectures' only,
It is a can of worms. It is closed source and lets hope it's finished.
Adobe don't fully support it and have publicly said so.
>>
>> Yes, Adobe has officially end-of-lifed Flash Player on Android:
>>
>> http://blogs.adobe.com/flashplayer/2012/06/flash
>>> It is a can of worms. It is closed source and lets hope it's finished.
>>> Adobe don't fully support it and have publicly said so.
I think it's much worse then a can of worms. I really don't understand why
people use flash for things that do not need flash:
why the hell should one use flash
2012/7/4 Ottavio Caruso :
> On 2 July 2012 01:55, stanley garvey wrote:
>
>>> It is a can of worms. It is closed source and lets hope it's finished.
>>> Adobe don't fully support it and have publicly said so.
>
> Yes, Adobe has officially end-of-lifed Flash Player on Android:
>
> http://blogs.adob
On 2 July 2012 01:55, stanley garvey wrote:
>> It is a can of worms. It is closed source and lets hope it's finished.
>> Adobe don't fully support it and have publicly said so.
Yes, Adobe has officially end-of-lifed Flash Player on Android:
http://blogs.adobe.com/flashplayer/2012/06/flash-playe
