**
It'll trigger an error when you try to relate an asset and a people if the people's record has its reconciliation id at 0."used by" relationship type if memory serves?On 09 Aug, 2013,at 11:40 PM, Peter Romain wrote:Is there a reason for having the BMC_Person CI’s oth
Is there a reason for having the BMC_Person CI’s other than for software
license management?
If this is the only reason then it would be logical to disable this as people
records and BMC_Person records always go out of sync in my experience.
From: Action Request System discussion list
: BMC_Person
**
Click "Initiate CI Sync" on the form CTM:PeopleSyncConsole. This sets a trigger
on all CTM:People records that don't have a Recon ID yet. Then there's an
escalation that fires every 25 minutes to create the missing BMC_Person
records. (The actual update
Click "Initiate CI Sync" on the form CTM:PeopleSyncConsole. This sets a trigger
on all CTM:People records that don't have a Recon ID yet. Then there's an
escalation that fires every 25 minutes to create the missing BMC_Person
records. (The actual update is done via th
Hi,
In CTM: People do an advanced search as 'Profile Status'= "Enabled" AND
'ReconciliationIdentity'=0. The profile records you get as results are those
which are not pushed into BMC_Person. Select the profile and change the status
to "Offline" and the
Kathy,
there is a bug in the workflow that sends them to BMC_Person, especially if you
are creating them through an import process or and interface. The way I fix
them is save the CTM:People record for the person in question with a status of
Offline, save, then back to Enable, save. This causes
:)
Regards,
Ryan.
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Kathy Morris
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 3:10 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: BMC_Person
**
Hi,
How do I get users from CTM:People into the BMC_Person class?
We have over
I would suggest that you review the workflow on CTM:People to determine if the
creation of Person has been disabled.
-Original Message-
From: Kathy Morris
To: arslist
Sent: Wed, Aug 7, 2013 3:15 pm
Subject: Re: BMC_Person
**
Hi,
We are on 7.6.04 and the BMC_Person records for
Hi,
We are on 7.6.04 and the BMC_Person records for many users are not in the
table.
Not sure why. So now I need to try to get those users from CTM:People into
BMC_Person.
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Roger Justice
Sent
What Version, I know in 7.6.04 that when a People Record was created a Person
record was created automatically.
-Original Message-
From: Kathy Morris
To: arslist
Sent: Wed, Aug 7, 2013 3:10 pm
Subject: BMC_Person
**
Hi,
How do I get users from CTM:People into the BMC_Person
Hi,
How do I get users from CTM:People into the BMC_Person class?
We have over 40,000 users in CTM:People, however they are not in BMC_Person.
We need to have the 40,000 in BMC_Person.
___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access
9:42 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG<mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG>
Subject: Populating the BMC_Person
**
Hi all,
I have noticed now in 7.6.04 (maybe it was earlier as well), that when you
add/update someone in the CTM:People form, it is adding them to the CMDB as
well. Is there a reason that th
27;s were being created.
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Ben Chernys
Sent: 09 April 2012 20:48
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Populating the BMC_Person
**
It is for impact analysis. Only relationships can be used for th
Sent: April-09-12 08:42
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Populating the BMC_Person
**
Hi all,
I have noticed now in 7.6.04 (maybe it was earlier as well), that when you
add/update someone in the CTM:People form, it is adding them to the CMDB as
well. Is there a reason that this form is bei
ting the BMC_Person
**
Hi all,
I have noticed now in 7.6.04 (maybe it was earlier as well), that when you
add/update someone in the CTM:People form, it is adding them to the CMDB as
well. Is there a reason that this form is being populated?
Right now we link people to the CI, by using
Hi all,
I have noticed now in 7.6.04 (maybe it was earlier as well), that when you
add/update someone in the CTM:People form, it is adding them to the CMDB as
well. Is there a reason that this form is being populated?
Right now we link people to the CI, by using the AST:ComputerSystem form and
We decided to user BMC_Person class after all.
Thanks
frex
--- En date de : Mar 10.11.09, Frex Popo a écrit :
De: Frex Popo
Objet: BMC_Person or Ast:AssetPeople. - URGENT -
À: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Date: Mardi 10 Novembre 2009, 15h46
Hello everyone,
Just received a request to think
Hello everyone,
Just received a request to think about how we can start storing data on users,
data consumers, providers, etc.. in the CMDB. At first glance, I noticed the
BMC_Person class which I could use... Obviously we already store more or less
the same data on CTM:people...But...
We
Dear Lister,
I need to define Category, Type, Item for instance of
BMC_ConcreteCollection, BMC_Person. But on "Product Category" console
- "CI Type*" field, i don't find those class as selection value. So I
can't make any Categorization for instances on those cla
uist
WindwardCG
- Original Message
From: Roney Samuel Varghese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Monday, July 9, 2007 9:16:59 PM
Subject: Re: CMDB's BMC_Person class: usage?
** Hey Bob,
I beleive the BMC_Person class stores information about the people who manag
Hey Bob,
I beleive the BMC_Person class stores information about the people who
manage and depend on the other CIs in your environment. The First question
you need to ask yourself depending on your environment is Can People be
Configuration Items in your environment? According to me the answer
I've got years and years of ARS experience, but I'm a bit of a CMDB novice.
Can anybody tell me the intended (or non-intended but useful) usage of the
BMC_Person class in CMDB? In an ITSM 7.0 environment where we already are
populating CTM:People, I'm not sure what benef
22 matches
Mail list logo
