phone)
tony.worthing...@kohls.com
www.kohls.com
From:
Frank Caruso
To:
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Date:
06/04/2009 05:04 AM
Subject:
RESOLVED Re: Bad HPD Assignment Records
Sent by:
"Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)"
** Looks like the problem has to do with users searching
ESPN IT Client Architecture and Automation
> 860-766-4761
>
>
> --
> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
> arsl...@arslist.org] *On Behalf Of *Frank Caruso
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 28, 2009 10:16 AM
> *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> *Subject:* Bad HPD Assi
__
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Frank Caruso
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 10:16 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Bad HPD Assignment Records
**
Has anybody seen issues with ITSM 7 creating HPD Assignment records with Actua
ction Request System discussion list(ARSList)"
05/28/2009 09:15 AM
Please respond to
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
To
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
cc
Subject
Bad HPD Assignment Records
**
Has anybody seen issues with ITSM 7 creating HPD Assignment records with
Actual and Business Duration (Seconds) that
Has anybody seen issues with ITSM 7 creating HPD Assignment records with
Actual and Business Duration (Seconds) that are equal to roughly 40 years
time? The seconds value are 1242994998 and bigger. Not all of the assignment
records are like this.
I think what is happening is that a bad Date (DateT
5 matches
Mail list logo