Re: RESOLVED Re: Bad HPD Assignment Records

2009-06-04 Thread Tony Worthington
phone) tony.worthing...@kohls.com www.kohls.com From: Frank Caruso To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Date: 06/04/2009 05:04 AM Subject: RESOLVED Re: Bad HPD Assignment Records Sent by: "Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)" ** Looks like the problem has to do with users searching

RESOLVED Re: Bad HPD Assignment Records

2009-06-04 Thread Frank Caruso
ESPN IT Client Architecture and Automation > 860-766-4761 > > > -- > *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto: > arsl...@arslist.org] *On Behalf Of *Frank Caruso > *Sent:* Thursday, May 28, 2009 10:16 AM > *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > *Subject:* Bad HPD Assi

Re: Bad HPD Assignment Records

2009-05-28 Thread Lammey, Peter A.
__ From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Frank Caruso Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 10:16 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Bad HPD Assignment Records ** Has anybody seen issues with ITSM 7 creating HPD Assignment records with Actua

Re: Bad HPD Assignment Records

2009-05-28 Thread Dennis Ruble
ction Request System discussion list(ARSList)" 05/28/2009 09:15 AM Please respond to arslist@ARSLIST.ORG To arslist@ARSLIST.ORG cc Subject Bad HPD Assignment Records ** Has anybody seen issues with ITSM 7 creating HPD Assignment records with Actual and Business Duration (Seconds) that

Bad HPD Assignment Records

2009-05-28 Thread Frank Caruso
Has anybody seen issues with ITSM 7 creating HPD Assignment records with Actual and Business Duration (Seconds) that are equal to roughly 40 years time? The seconds value are 1242994998 and bigger. Not all of the assignment records are like this. I think what is happening is that a bad Date (DateT