FW: CI Name* should Unique in Asset Manag

2010-08-04 Thread Abhay Somani
From: Maneesh Gotiya (WT01 - GMT-Telecom Equipment) Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 8:58 PM To: Abhay Somani (WT01 - WT - Internal Vertical) Subject: RE: CI Name* should Unique in Asset Manag Reply him: create unique index for this field... in base element From: Abhay Somani (WT01

Re: FW: CI Name* should Unique in Asset Manag

2010-08-04 Thread Charles Baldi
Somani (WT01 - WT - Internal Vertical) Subject: RE: CI Name* should Unique in Asset Manag Reply him”: create unique index for this field… in base element …. From: Abhay Somani (WT01 - WT - Internal Vertical) Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 10:52 PM To: Maneesh Gotiya (WT01 - GMT-Telecom

Re: CI Name* should Unique in Asset Manag

2010-08-02 Thread Pierson, Shawn
/ CMDB. Thanks, Shawn Pierson Remedy Developer | Southern Union From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Rick Cook Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2010 6:57 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: CI Name* should Unique in Asset Manag ** Try looking

Re: CI Name* should Unique in Asset Manag

2010-08-02 Thread Lammey, Peter A.
, August 02, 2010 9:58 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: CI Name* should Unique in Asset Manag ** I could come up with some quick reasons why it's a bad idea. The most basic one is that while unique CI Names would be good from the perspective of managing physical assets, it gets tricky when

Re: CI Name* should Unique in Asset Manag

2010-08-02 Thread Charles Baldi
) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Pierson, Shawn Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 9:58 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: CI Name* should Unique in Asset Manag ** I could come up with some quick reasons why it’s a bad idea.  The most basic one is that while unique CI Names would be good

Re: CI Name* should Unique in Asset Manag

2010-08-02 Thread Ramey, Anne
...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Charles Baldi Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 10:50 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: CI Name* should Unique in Asset Manag The CMDB doesn't use NAME as a unique index because you can have multiple records for the same CI (with the same name) in different Data Sets

Re: CI Name* should Unique in Asset Manag

2010-08-02 Thread Charles Baldi
Subject: Re: CI Name* should Unique in Asset Manag The CMDB doesn't use NAME as a unique index because you can have multiple records for the same CI (with the same name) in different Data Sets.  If you want to prevent a user from entering a duplicate name then you have to do it in workflow

Re: CI Name* should Unique in Asset Manag

2010-08-02 Thread Wirasat Siddiqi
Of Charles Baldi Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 10:50 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: CI Name* should Unique in Asset Manag The CMDB doesn't use NAME as a unique index because you can have multiple records for the same CI (with the same name) in different Data Sets. If you want

Re: CI Name* should Unique in Asset Manag

2010-08-02 Thread Lyle Taylor
Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Wirasat Siddiqi Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 9:14 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: CI Name* should Unique in Asset Manag ** I think there are 2 challenges I can see making CI Name Unique, 1. CI Name belongs

CI Name* should Unique in Asset Manag

2010-07-31 Thread IT (Amanullah Bashir Ahmed)
Hi there, Version 7.1 In Asset Management CI Name* would be unique, how is it possible? I want to make CI Name* Unique in Asset Management. Is there any possibility? Thanks Regards Amanullah DISCLAIMER: This e-mail message including any of its attachments is intended solely for the

Re: CI Name* should Unique in Asset Manag

2010-07-31 Thread Rick Cook
Message- From: IT (Amanullah Bashir Ahmed) ahmed...@emiratesnbd.com Sender: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 15:00:14 To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Reply-To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: CI Name* should Unique in Asset