Re: Checking on selection of more than one row in a table without walking it.

2010-06-22 Thread LJ LongWing
Adam, One problem I can see with Remedy detecting this and taking some action without a button press is this. Let's say you select one record, do you want it to fire then?then you select another, do you want it to fire then...at what point does the workflow fire?...it has no idea when the

Re: Checking on selection of more than one row in a table without walking it

2010-06-22 Thread Adam Niedzwiecki
Hello, I think AL fire on a secondary table selection /de-selection option would be indeed very nice, it will give more flexibility; should not be difficult to catch this selection. Cheers, Adam -- Date:Tue, 22 Jun 2010 08:10:43 -0600 From:LJ

Re: Checking on selection of more than one row in a table without walking it.

2010-06-21 Thread tarner
You have received a secure email from tarner at Great Lakes Higher Education Corporation and Affiliates Please pick up the package at the following Web address: https://securemail.glhec.org/ime?x=4-9222370-4701327-6YNBM9R9lang=en_US The package will expire on Sunday September 19, 2010 at

Re: Checking on selection of more than one row in a table without walking it.

2010-06-20 Thread Joe D'Souza
Chintan, You remember right.. 0 is for no row selected, 1 is for a single row selection and 2 is for multiple rows.. Joe -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org]on Behalf Of Chintan Shah Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 12:24

Re: Checking on selection of more than one row in a table without walking it.

2010-06-20 Thread Joe D'Souza
No.. $ROWSELECTED$ does not do a table walk. If it did, the results of that would have taken a while on tables that had extremely large number of records. Joe -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org]on Behalf Of patchsk Sent:

Re: Checking on selection of more than one row in a table without walking it.

2010-06-20 Thread Adam Niedzwiecki
Hello, I will rephrase the question. By pressing SHIFT or CNTR key one can do secondary selection on a table. How to catch this without pressing any button to start AL with a table loop guide. Active Link execute on Menu/Row/Level Choice will fire only on a primary selection. But is deaf on

Checking on selection of more than one row in a table without walking it.

2010-06-19 Thread Adam Niedzwiecki
Hello, Is there any way to find out if more than one row in a table field is selected, without so table walk functionality (User version 7.0.1, Server version 7.0.01)? Regards, Adam Adam Niedzwiecki |EXPEDIO RM/OM Design | Tech Mahindra British Telecom, Leavesden Park, Watford Mobile: +44 778

Re: Checking on selection of more than one row in a table without walking it.

2010-06-19 Thread Chintan Shah
As far as I remember there is a keyword called $ROWSELECTED$ or something like that which could be used to trigger workflow on the records selected in table. From top of my head, I believe, it has values of 0,1,2 (don't exactly remember what they mean though..but I think they specify whether

Re: Checking on selection of more than one row in a table without walking it.

2010-06-19 Thread patchsk
One way or the other you end up doing table walk to get the number of selected rows. The colcount or any other table functions act on a whole table not just selected rows. On Jun 19, 5:50 am, Adam Niedzwiecki adam.niedzwie...@bt.com wrote: Hello, Is there any way to find out if more than one