Re: LoadTesting ITSM 764

2013-08-19 Thread Armen Avedisijan
** There is probably some confusion here as I have been with Scapa Technologies for close to 15 years and have been part of the product development ever since but did not understand what was being refereed to as a Scapa beta. Some background information may be useful to avoid any

Re: LoadTesting ITSM 764

2013-08-07 Thread Armen Avedisijan
Using a single user account in a test like that would also mean that as the test progresses user will have rapidly increasing number of open tickets created. So in addition to caching effect, if a test is allowed to run long enough or repeated few times there will probably be a gradual

Re: LoadTesting ITSM 764

2013-08-07 Thread David Charters
4370 W 126th Zionsville, In 46077 -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Armen Avedisijan Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 10:03 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: LoadTesting ITSM 764 Using a single user

LoadTesting ITSM 764

2013-08-06 Thread Frank Caruso
We are load testing ITSM 764 using a tool from HP. The script is working well and simulates a user logging in, moving to the new incident form, filling out a ticket and clicking Save. We have set up 50 concurrent sessions and had it running for 10 minutes. For ease of set we have been using the

Re: LoadTesting ITSM 764

2013-08-06 Thread Longwing, Lj
from a caching perspective it may make a difference. Having 50 of the same user doing the same action is easily cashed by both the DB and the Web server. I would think two or three users with different permissions, performing different actions simultaneously (multiplied by many of course) would

Re: LoadTesting ITSM 764

2013-08-06 Thread Lewington, Dominic
. Good luck and let me know if you need any help! Regards, Dom From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Longwing, Lj Sent: 06 August 2013 14:14 To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: LoadTesting ITSM 764 ** from a caching perspective it may