ADV: MonitorRemedy from Panacea WAS Open question to BMC on troubleshooting without the WUT

2014-10-23 Thread Deepak Thohan
Hi Larry and others, Troubleshooting without the WUT in a Server Group environment is one of the use-cases the MonitorRemedy product is designed for. Managing load balanced server group environments can be a complicated and a time consuming process Typically, Remedy specialists have to

Re: Open question to BMC on troubleshooting without the WUT

2014-10-22 Thread Larry Robinson
Hi Folks, John Baker was kind enough to let me know that the script I posted had some potential security vulnerabilities. He provided the following alternative: %@ page import=java.net.* % htmlhead/headbodyp % String myhostname= null; try { myhostname=

Open question to BMC on troubleshooting without the WUT

2014-10-20 Thread John Baker
I've not tested this: %@ page import=java.net.* % htmlhead/headbodyp % String myhostname= null; try { myhostname= InetAddress.getLocalHost().getHostName(); } catch (UnknownHostException e) { } if (myhostname!=null) { % This application server is running on hostname %=

Re: Open question to BMC on troubleshooting without the WUT

2014-10-17 Thread Walters, Mark
I'd suggest using the driver or JavaDriver utility that is included with the server. You can script this to login and issue any API call - you also get the option to set the RPC queue so you could create a test that logs and tests several different queues in case you're just using up all of

Re: Open question to BMC on troubleshooting without the WUT

2014-10-17 Thread Larry Robinson
Thanks John... I'll certainly pass that on. Larry On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 1:26 AM, John Baker jba...@javasystemsolutions.com wrote: Larry I wouldn't suggest using that JSP :) It is running a native application (hostname) to get the hostname that is readily available from a Java API call.

Re: Open question to BMC on troubleshooting without the WUT

2014-10-17 Thread Larry Robinson
Hi John, As it turns out, I no longer have access to the author of the program I posted. Could elaborate on what the vulnerability is and how to implement the same functionality in a more secure manner? Thanks for your insights. Larry On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 1:26 AM, John Baker

Open question to BMC on troubleshooting without the WUT

2014-10-16 Thread William Rentfrow
I sent this to our premiere support person and manager, but I'd be interested to see what others have to say about this too. Original message below: Hi - This came up on our call and I wanted to write it out. BMC has stated that the Windows User Tool (WUT) is going to be discontinued (in

Re: Open question to BMC on troubleshooting without the WUT

2014-10-16 Thread Voudouris, Chris
Has anyone tried doing what William is asking for with BMC's BPPM suite? On paper that looks like the way to go, but I wonder if the LOE to set it up is worth the cost. From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of William

Re: Open question to BMC on troubleshooting without the WUT

2014-10-16 Thread John Sundberg
Write a JSP that connects via the Java API to each machine directly. Done. Get lunch. -John On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 1:02 PM, William Rentfrow wrentf...@stratacominc.com wrote: ** I sent this to our premiere support person and manager, but I'd be interested to see what others have to

Re: Open question to BMC on troubleshooting without the WUT

2014-10-16 Thread Grooms, Frederick W
Even though support for the WUT was discontinued after 7.6.4 you can still use it to log into the servers (unless you set the Minimum API version value). Fred From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of William Rentfrow Sent: Thursday, October

Re: Open question to BMC on troubleshooting without the WUT

2014-10-16 Thread William Rentfrow
John - You're right - a custom solution is pretty easy, but it kind of proves my point: there's no easy way to do it with the BMC tools. William Rentfrow From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of John Sundberg Sent: Thursday, October 16,

Re: Open question to BMC on troubleshooting without the WUT

2014-10-16 Thread Arner, Todd
Could you confirm the server is available by opening the server up in Dev Studio? Just a thought. Todd Arner -- The information contained in this communication may be confidential, is intended only for the use of the

Re: Open question to BMC on troubleshooting without the WUT

2014-10-16 Thread William Rentfrow
Yes and no. I've seen instances where users are locked up but the admin threads work (and vice versa). So it's not the same test really as connecting as a user. William Rentfrow wrentf...@stratacominc.com Office: 715-204-3061 or 701-232-5697x25 Cell: 715-498-5056 From: Action Request System

Re: Open question to BMC on troubleshooting without the WUT

2014-10-16 Thread Joe D'Souza
How about issuing one of the command line utilities to each of the servers such as maybe the arsignal -g that reloads the def cache. If a server is not responding you would get a error 90. I do not remember all the switches to arsignal offhand but there should be one that has less of an impact

Re: Open question to BMC on troubleshooting without the WUT

2014-10-16 Thread Rick Cook
Good ideas, Joe! Perhaps the arserver -v (or whatever it is now) that returns the version would fit the bill - quick return, confirms that the server is up, and almost zero performance impact. Rick Cook On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Joe D'Souza jdso...@shyle.net wrote: ** How about

Re: Open question to BMC on troubleshooting without the WUT

2014-10-16 Thread Rob Dudley
I really just wish that when users do become hung, in the load balanced web/server group environment, and it is one of the servers which is unresponsive - that there would be some way that the server group would recognize it and restart the armonitor processes... OR at least place something in the

Re: Open question to BMC on troubleshooting without the WUT

2014-10-16 Thread Joe D'Souza
Thanks Rick, Almost forgot about the -v option. Yes that would be far quicker than even the user tool. That would be the least of impact. Joe _ From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Rick Cook Sent: Thursday, October 16,

Re: Open question to BMC on troubleshooting without the WUT

2014-10-16 Thread Joe D'Souza
If you are on UNIX or LINUX you might be able to design a cron job that runs every few minutes to do that using the output of arsignal -v. Joe _ From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Rob Dudley Sent: Thursday, October 16,

Re: Open question to BMC on troubleshooting without the WUT

2014-10-16 Thread Brian Goralczyk
I think the issue is that you are not testing the same process that the users are utilizing. That would increase the chance of false positives. That can be more frustrating than taking the time to do it manually. The best answer that I can see is to write a java program that can run and monitor

Re: Open question to BMC on troubleshooting without the WUT

2014-10-16 Thread William Rentfrow
Moot point either way - cron jobs are not allowed on the servers for various reasons. There are other ways of doing it though similar to cron. William Rentfrow wrentf...@stratacominc.com Office: 715-204-3061 or 701-232-5697x25 Cell: 715-498-5056 From: Action Request System discussion

Re: Open question to BMC on troubleshooting without the WUT

2014-10-16 Thread Doug Blair
We do this with a Unix/Linux shell script every minute. Keep a simple log in a plain text file. It notifies via text message if everything isn't perfect. Check the log to see which server didn't respond. We actually test several paths - the status page of the midtiers gives you an end-to-end

Open question to BMC on troubleshooting without the WUT

2014-10-16 Thread John Baker
The problem is not so much the lack of WUT, with its confused Windows 3.1 UI, but the lack of quality tools within Mid Tier to troubleshoot problems. Everything involves using a workflow console, but John hit the nail on the head, there needs to be a quality user interface that isn't remotely

Re: Open question to BMC on troubleshooting without the WUT

2014-10-16 Thread patchsk
We have a midtier hosted under a tomcat not part of the load balancer. So users are not routed to this midtier. We added all individual arsystem nodes to this midtier. That way when you login using this midtier or search for forms you see links for each arsystem node. You can open forms and do

Re: Open question to BMC on troubleshooting without the WUT

2014-10-16 Thread Larry Robinson
Hi William, I too receive problem reports from our Mid-tier users and struggled to determine which server they were connected to. I asked one of my JSP experts to write us a program that could run from the browser that would emit the name and IP of the Tomcat server that was serving the users

Open question to BMC on troubleshooting without the WUT

2014-10-16 Thread John Baker
Larry I wouldn't suggest using that JSP :) It is running a native application (hostname) to get the hostname that is readily available from a Java API call. Running native applications isn't going to do the performance of your Mid Tier any good, and anyone with a copy of wget can almost