WWRUG specials is an infringement on Vendors that do go, unless the Vendor was there

2012-10-22 Thread dan
John I don' t see the relevance of me attending KEG to you attending KEG or WWRUG? The primary issue with your WWRUG special is copyright and branding infringement. Vendors pay money to be associated with the conference, and attendance is of course optional, some vendors come every other year.

WWRUG specials is an infringement on Vendors that do go, unless the Vendor was there

2012-10-22 Thread John Baker
Dan, I sent two vendors to RUG with lots of information for those who popped by their stands :) You'll be banning Christmas next. If the subject line contains (adv), you don't have to read it. And I really have no idea what you're wittering on about legal issues. You're funny :) John

Re: WWRUG specials is an infringement on Vendors that do go, unless the Vendor was there

2012-10-22 Thread Susan Palmer
John, From a 'customer' perspective, I'd recommend you stop the replies to the list. This is not a positive image for your company or product. Susan Palmer On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 1:10 PM, John Baker jba...@javasystemsolutions.comwrote: Dan, I sent two vendors to RUG with lots of

Re: WWRUG specials is an infringement on Vendors that do go, unless the Vendor was there

2012-10-22 Thread David M. Clark
From looking back over the notes, I think technically Dan drew first blood. Granted I'm doing some statistical work today, so I'm a little drowsey. From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Susan Palmer Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 1:54 PM

WWRUG specials is an infringement on Vendors that do go, unless the Vendor was there

2012-10-22 Thread John Baker
Susan I don't care if someone wants to have a go at me for X, Y or Z. I do care if someone wants to point fault at JSS products or service, because that's a real mark of failure. And if there's failure, I will get it fixed and fall over myself to apologise, which is why I believe we've

Re: WWRUG specials is an infringement on Vendors that do go, unless the Vendor was there

2012-10-22 Thread arslist
Most interesting part is I thought I was doing private replies, appeared to be private replies, And they aren't in my list of posts to the list. My apologies to all. Daniel From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of David M. Clark

Re: WWRUG specials is an infringement on Vendors that do go, unless the Vendor was there

2012-10-22 Thread arslist
I think you will find that you just replied to the list about a private conversation, I just checked my outbound and they were to you not the list. As stated privately: I in no way intend to attack the person or the product, Just enforce ethical and list behaviour. You will receive no further