> What "bells and whistles" do you mean? Do you mean things like fancy
> modulation/demodulation schemes for PDH locks etc? Let's have a bells and
> whistles list and see what we can agree to cull.
Agreed, I think a list of the current "bells and whistles" would help a lot in
terms of thinking
On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 9:15 PM Thomas Harty
wrote:
> I think a short exploratory project would be a good idea, as I have no real
> means of making an informed decision about where to shoot for on the
> performance/flexibility v complexity scale. 8 CORDICS + accumulators on 8
> channels sounds
Yes, the simplest design that does the job is the best.
Unfortunately, the issue with building hardware for physics experiments is that
there is never a clear-cut and exact specification for what's needed for a
number of reasons:
- it wouldn't be research if we understood everything
Please see the attached PDF.
2018-August.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
___
ARTIQ mailing list
https://ssl.serverraum.org/lists/listinfo/artiq
On Thursday, August 09, 2018 03:12 PM, Thomas Harty wrote:
So, the questions are: how much do we need to simplify the SAWG to make
it okay to debug and maintain at the 1GSPS data rate? and, what's the
way of doing that, which has the least impact on users?
"In anything at all, perfection is
Sébastien,
Understood. But, that's quite a vague answer. We don't want to throw away
performance/flexibility unnecessarily. So, the questions are: how much do we
need to simplify the SAWG to make it okay to debug and maintain at the 1GSPS
data rate? and, what's the way of doing that, which
