> It seems a bit weird to me to use this definition at the (low) level of the
> absorption routines. Perhaps one solutions would be to have an option for
> this behaviour when ingesting concentration profile data? Perhaps by >
> passing in a list of species that should be considered as not
Dear Stuart,
yes, exactly, thanks for pointing this out. :-) I had completely forgotten
about this.
This problem is related but slightly different: The VMR profile that we get as
input may be based on the convention that x = p_species/p_dry, rather than
p_species/p_total.
I just quickly
