Hi,
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 4:30 PM Richard Larsson
wrote:
> [...]
>
Indeed, the description seems coherent but difficult to follow. Can you
> point out where in the docs you found this? It should be updated to
> clearly read that a positive wind_v in 1D equates to a positive v in the
> standar
Hi Jana, Hi all,
The definition of the winds do not change between 1D, 2D and 3D. That
would at least lead to messy code.
This is in fact a question of the azimuth angle of the sensor. There is
also a north direction in 1D and the sensor is assumed to be looking
exactly North for 1D. This is
Hi Jana,
Den ons 3 apr. 2019 kl 17:08 skrev Jana Mendrok :
> Hi,
>
> thanks Richard for your feedback. I'm not sure, though, whether I really
> understand it (incl. wondering why you talk about jacobians here...).
> *scratches head*
>
I might have misunderstood the question slightly, but the eas
Hi,
thanks Richard for your feedback. I'm not sure, though, whether I really
understand it (incl. wondering why you talk about jacobians here...).
*scratches head*
we're trying to pin down where the wind is blowing in a 1D atm setup. 1D
allows us to have vertical (w) and horizontal (v) winds that
Hi Richard,
> On 3 Apr 2019, at 14:03, Richard Larsson wrote:
>
> Ps. Oliver, please sent another email when it is fixed.
Since you (and Jana, Lukas and I) received this mail via gmail, I have to
assume it is fixed. Although it is possible that Google blocks mails depending
on the sender addr
Hi Rita,
For the directional components, the sign of a retrieved component with the
ARTS Jacobian is positive along the axes themselves. The direction the
sensor is looking only influences the scale of the Jacobian, not the sign
of the direction of the retrieval calculation. If you look parallel