> I think we should probably clear out all the MRs except the syntax
> rationalization, then release bug fix 3.3.3, and then move to get the syntax
> branch integrated as a release candidate for 3.4.
>
> I think the syntax isolation is a big enough change in behavior that it
> merits being 3.4
>
On 5 Aug 2018, at 17:31, Faré wrote:
In case anyone takes over maintenance of ASDF in the future, I wrote
this mind dump on some of its more stuble "magic" behavior:
https://fare.livejournal.com/190738.html
Thanks to Eric Timmons for the prompting...
PS: there are relatedly a few bug fixes in
In case anyone takes over maintenance of ASDF in the future, I wrote
this mind dump on some of its more stuble "magic" behavior:
https://fare.livejournal.com/190738.html
Thanks to Eric Timmons for the prompting...
PS: there are relatedly a few bug fixes in 3.3.2.5 — thanks and
congratulations aga
On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 23:07 -0500, Daniel Herring wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Feb 2010, Robert Goldman wrote:
>
> > "The best is the enemy of the good." --- Voltaire
>
> So far, I have only written about pragmatically solved problems. Do you
> really want to hear what I think might be best? ;)
>
>
>
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010, Robert Goldman wrote:
> "The best is the enemy of the good." --- Voltaire
So far, I have only written about pragmatically solved problems. Do you
really want to hear what I think might be best? ;)
> There seems to be a strong sentiment from at least part of this mailing
>
"The best is the enemy of the good." --- Voltaire
There seems to be a strong sentiment from at least part of this mailing
list that ASDF loading should be reorganized so that some minimal core
functionality is loaded, and more can be loaded on demand.
I'd like to go on record as opposing this. I
