1- While the trivial convenience function bundle-system was removed,
the underlying functionality still exists. The function was ill-named
legacy of dubious value. Do ABCL users actually use this function as
such?
2- On the other hand, its removal is a bit brutal. It might have been
better to use
Faré writes:
> 1- While the trivial convenience function bundle-system was removed,
> the underlying functionality still exists. The function was ill-named
> legacy of dubious value. Do ABCL users actually use this function as
> such?
bundle-system is a function with a good name, reflecting
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 8:12 AM, Daniel Kochmański
wrote:
> Hey,
>
> now all MKCL tests pass as expected. I've also disabled load-bundle-op
> as a default option (seems like a MKCL bug):
>
> https://gitlab.common-lisp.net/asdf/asdf/merge_requests/11
>
I'll have to look
Hey,
now all MKCL tests pass as expected. I've also disabled load-bundle-op
as a default option (seems like a MKCL bug):
https://gitlab.common-lisp.net/asdf/asdf/merge_requests/11
The issue with the system modules is caused by a muss in the systems
definitions of MKCL. Namely asd files are
Hello ASDF devs,
I noticed recently that asdf/bundle:bundle-system has disappeared from ASDF.
MKCL is/was a user of that function as a convenient entry point to the ASDF
bundle facility.
My impression was that, along the lines of asdf:load-system and
asdf:compile-system,
asdf:bundle-system was
> On Sep 11, 2016, at 08:31, Jean-Claude Beaudoin
> wrote:
>
> Hello ASDF devs,
>
> I noticed recently that asdf/bundle:bundle-system has disappeared from ASDF.
> MKCL is/was a user of that function as a convenient entry point to the ASDF
> bundle facility.
Jean-Claude Beaudoin writes:
> Hello ASDF devs,
>
> I noticed recently that asdf/bundle:bundle-system has disappeared from ASDF.
> MKCL is/was a user of that function as a convenient entry point to the ASDF
> bundle facility.
>
> My impression was that, along the lines of asdf:load-system and
>