Re: [ASN.1] xml

2002-01-02 Thread salai sivamal.G
try www.cryptix.org if donot get let me know. -Salai www.icope.com Bangalore. India. - Original Message - From: Salim Mounir AlAoui [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 10:43 PM Subject: [ASN.1] xml hello, does anyone have some pointers for me,

Re: SV: [ASN.1] Reverse Engineering

2002-01-02 Thread DUBUISSON Olivier
John Larmouth wrote: This looks rather like ASN.1 value notation, for an information object set specification. I suggest you feed it into an ASN.1 pretty printer, when it should become more readable. A pretty-printer is freely available from France Telecom's ASN.1 website at

SV: [ASN.1] xml

2002-01-02 Thread Steen Oluf Karlsen
Hello Salim Just a quick remark on your question - going from XML to ASN.1 and vice versa After studying the effects of going from a message set specified in the header file format of ANSI C to an ASN.1 specified set versus one specified in XML I made the personal conclusion that ASN.1 is a

Re: SV: [ASN.1] xml

2002-01-02 Thread Phil Griffin
Hi Steen, Much truth in what you say below. And for me, the best of all worlds is to use ASN.1 definitions for the schema underlying the encodings required for specifications. As you note, ASN.1 is a mature, reliable schema and unlike TRex, RELAX, XSD, etc. does not restrict me to a single

[ASN.1] Where can I get ITU-T X.680 (ASN.1 BER) (94) specification?

2002-01-02 Thread Konduru, Chandra
Hi, Can some one tell me where can I get X.680 (94) ASN.1 BER recommendations. Thank you, Chandra

[ASN.1] Question on TAGS

2002-01-02 Thread Bujji krishna R B
Hello, I would like to know ,how the tags for the following are enoded in BER. X ::= [0] EXPLICIT [1] IMPLICIT INTEGER Y ::= [0] IMPLICIT [1] EXPLICIT BOOLEAN Am I correct , if the tag for X is encoded as [0] [1] and the universal tag of INTEGER is not