Re: [Assam] assam@assamnet.org moderators ..pls read

2008-03-04 Thread uttam borthakur
Sikkim vanished as an independent state and became a part of Indian boundary proper. That's what. Just an euphemism for annexation:-) umesh sharma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: could you pl explain: *** then vanishing trick done by Sikkim uttam borthakur wrote: If I may, I think that one has the

Re: [Assam] assam@assamnet.org moderators ..pls read

2008-03-04 Thread Ram Dhar
Mar 2008 15:00:25 -0600 To: assam@assamnet.org From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Assam] assam@assamnet.org moderators ..pls read assam@assamnet.org my be held accountable for facilitating it as well *** Yeah? Why? *** Any number of Assam newspapers publish those and 'facilitate

[Assam] assam@assamnet.org moderators ..pls read

2008-03-03 Thread Ram Dhar
pls read http://www.telegraphindia.com/1080303/jsp/northeast/story_8972344.jsp forum moderators may read this , 100s of us receive the same e-mail content coz we are subscribed to this forum [EMAIL PROTECTED] my be held accountable for facilitating it as well ... ..I

Re: [Assam] assam@assamnet.org moderators ..pls read

2008-03-03 Thread ad admn
i agree with u mr. dhar. this should be given a serious thought by everybody. On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 8:29 PM, Ram Dhar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: pls read http://www.telegraphindia.com/1080303/jsp/northeast/story_8972344.jsp forum moderators may read this , 100s of us receive the same

Re: [Assam] assam@assamnet.org moderators ..pls read

2008-03-03 Thread Chan Mahanta
assam@assamnet.org my be held accountable for facilitating it as well *** Yeah? Why? *** Any number of Assam newspapers publish those and 'facilitate' their dissemination among the public as well, don't they? How is it then assamnet should be held responsible and for WHAT? Because a

Re: [Assam] assam@assamnet.org moderators ..pls read

2008-03-03 Thread Chan Mahanta
At 10:21 PM +0530 3/3/08, ad admn wrote: i agree with u mr. dhar. this should be given a serious thought by everybody. *** Really? I will certainly consider it when I know WHO makes the recommendation. On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 8:29 PM, Ram Dhar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: pls read

Re: [Assam] assam@assamnet.org moderators ..pls read

2008-03-03 Thread Chan Mahanta
I read and I was quite amused by desi-justice represented by whoever made the following statements: Investigators claimed to have detected documents in the sent folder - *** That must therefore be unimpeachable proof , right? Question is of WHAT? Does it prove that Lachit Bordoloi

Re: [Assam] assam@assamnet.org moderators ..pls read

2008-03-03 Thread umesh sharma
C-da, I may not be sure of the crime but it does appear that the ULFA newsletter is written and published by Mr Bordoloi - who perhaps is the Ruby Bhuyan who is supposed to send it to AssamNet etc. Umesh Chan Mahanta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I read and I was quite amused by desi-justice

Re: [Assam] assam@assamnet.org moderators ..pls read

2008-03-03 Thread Chan Mahanta
I am re-sending the following without the March 02 issue of the Swdhinota attachment, since it might have gotten trapped in assam.org's junk folder for carrying too large an attachment. cm I may not be sure of the crime but it does appear that the ULFA newsletter is written and

Re: [Assam] assam@assamnet.org moderators ..pls read

2008-03-03 Thread uttam borthakur
If I may, I think that one has the right to discuss about his ideas concerning freedom, liberty etc. . An individual has the right to his own opinion. Only thing is he does not have the right to snatch other's life and property or freedom. Having said that, if someone has snatched his life or

Re: [Assam] assam@assamnet.org moderators ..pls read

2008-03-03 Thread umesh sharma
could you pl explain: *** then vanishing trick done by Sikkim uttam borthakur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If I may, I think that one has the right to discuss about his ideas concerning freedom, liberty etc. . An individual has the right to his own opinion. Only thing is he does not have the