to
President Clinton. So the present President George Bush will attack Iraq
just before the elctions.
From: Saurav Pathak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Alpana Sarangapani [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: ASSAMNETCOLORADO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Assam] Bush- a gambler?
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 02:06:21 -0500
to
President Clinton. So the present President George Bush will attack Iraq
just before the elctions.
Roshmi
From: Saurav Pathak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Alpana Sarangapani [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: ASSAMNETCOLORADO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Assam] Bush- a gambler?
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 02:06
ED]>Subject: Re: [Assam] Bush- a gambler?Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 02:06:21 -0500Alpana Sarangapani said on AssamNet:+ How do you ask? If you could ask (and they could reply - with a free mind),+ there won't be a dictator!
. The guy even had his sons-in-law killed, had he+ not?alpana-baideu,at the crux o
D Deka said on AssamNet:
+ Saurav,
+ Obviously you have collected a lot of information and have not
+ digested it yet.
otoh, dilip-da, you seem to have not only digested what i have said
but also extracted calories, vitamins and minerals that were originally
not there. :)
my request:
+ If he goes into exile and Iraq has democracy, it will be welcome
+ by all like me.
what exactly do you mean by democracy? would you agree to give the
iraqis a voice of their own? would you agree to a kurdistan? would
you agree to the shias in the south joining iran?
*** Excellent point.
at the crux of this dilemma lie the issue of sovereignity. the u.n imposed international order maintains that the protection of the sovereignity of a country is the foremost task. according to this "doctrine", this is the only way wars and human tragedies can be avoided.
so, even if a dictator
Alpana B. Sarangapani said on AssamNet:
+ + been having this 'collateral damage' for a while?
+ yes, i do.
+ Do you think this damage in the shape of acute human tragedy
+ (leave alone the fact that the state has gone economically 100 years
+ back and also the havoc that was
: Saurav Pathak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Alpana B. Sarangapani [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 3:53 PM
Subject: Re: [Assam] Bush- a gambler?
Alpana B. Sarangapani said on AssamNet:
+ + been having this 'collateral damage' for a while?
+ yes, i do.
+ Do
, March 05, 2003 9:24 AM
Subject: Re: [Assam] Bush- a gambler?
Alpana Sarangapani said on AssamNet:
+ Saurav: Lets hear your position now.
i oppose this war.
i wont even make a pacifist case. suffice it to say it is not in the
interest of common americans to go into this war. without
Alpana Sarangapani said on AssamNet:
+ the people in Iraq need to be 'saved', the dictator has been exploiting them
+ for decades.
before giving the iraqis help, ask them whether they want it. and
in what form.
+ don't you think they have had enough? what about collateral
+ damage?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: ASSAMNETCOLORADO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Assam] Bush- a gambler?
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 00:09:48 -0500
Alpana Sarangapani said on AssamNet:
+ the people in Iraq need to be 'saved', the dictator has been exploiting
them
+ for decades.
before giving the iraqis help
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Assam] Bush- a gambler?
Alpana Sarangapani said on AssamNet:
+ the people in Iraq need to be 'saved', the dictator has been exploiting
them
+ for decades.
before giving the iraqis help, ask them whether they want
Alpana Sarangapani said on AssamNet:
+ How do you ask? If you could ask (and they could reply - with a free mind),
+ there won't be a dictator. The guy even had his sons-in-law killed, had he
+ not?
alpana-baideu,
at the crux of this dilemma lie the issue of sovereignity. the
u.n imposed
Alpana Sarangapani said on AssamNet:
+ Saurav: Lets hear your position now.
i oppose this war.
i wont even make a pacifist case. suffice it to say it is not in the
interest of common americans to go into this war. without endorsement
from the u.n, americans will be seen as arrogant and
D Deka wrote:
5. Last but not the least, do I support this war or not?
Regarding 5, I do not support violence and war. But I do want to see a
change in the middle east, the hot bed of terrorism. That includes Saudi
Arabia, Iraq and Iran. Do you agree that a change is needed? Is Iraq the
right
It is not the mere presence of Americans in these countries that is causing the friction. Really it is the inevitable globalization, industrialization, assimilation, and spread of western thoughts and democratic ideas, that hard core islamic leaders cannot stand and are in Jihad for. Global
D Deka said on AssamNet:
+
+ It is not the mere presence of Americans in these countries that is causing the
friction. Really it is the inevitable globalization, industrialization, assimilation,
and spread of western thoughts and democratic ideas, that hard core islamic leaders
cannot
Saurav,
Obviously you have collected a lot of information and have not digested it yet. It is also obvious that you find fault with everything US government does. But face it, US government has collected more intelligence than you have, and Saddam Hussein is no saint. Without the US army at its
D Deka said on AssamNet:
+
+ Friedman thinks Bush is a man with a mission. Bush knows his future as a president
is at stake for this issue called Iraq. It may cost him dearly in the 2004 election or
even before. So why is he vocal and adamant about the war in Iraq? Friedman has his
Saurav, you asked about my position in this war. In what way? I am giving you a list. Take your pick.
1. Should the war start from the north or the south?
2. Should the war start next week or the following week?
3. Should it be an air war only or should it include ground troops?
4. Should the
D Deka said on AssamNet:
+
+ Saurav, you asked about my position in this war. In what way? I am giving you a
list. Take your pick.
+ 1. Should the war start from the north or the south?
+ 2. Should the war start next week or the following week?
+ 3. Should it be an air war only or
21 matches
Mail list logo
