Wow I get a reply from the author himself I'll try it thanks
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 26, 2014, at 8:16 PM, John Ehrman wrote:
>
> Micheal, Could you write DS 0CL(11*133) ?
>
> Regards... John Ehrman
Micheal, Could you write DS 0CL(11*133) ?
Regards... John Ehrman
The problem is that file manager see 2 separate dsects as as 2 records
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 26, 2014, at 6:10 PM, John Gilmore wrote:
>
> The '0' in
>
> 0CL133
>
> is called a duplication factor. It is not called a replication factor.
>
> Writing
>
> 11CL133
>
> thus specifies 11
The '0' in
0CL133
is called a duplication factor. It is not called a replication factor.
Writing
11CL133
thus specifies 11 instances of 133 characters, and any duplication
factor of 0 specifies no instances, only alignment, so that 0H
specifies halfword alignment, 0F specifies fullword alignm
I guess for lack of a better forum (as this dsect is being parsed by file
manager) it sees 0CL133 as a group item I am trying to create any array
Of items which equal 133
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 26, 2014, at 5:22 PM, retired mainframer
> wrote:
>
> What is the desired difference to eith
What is the desired difference to either the assembler or your object code
between
DS 0CL133
And
DS 11 * 0CL133 if that were allowed?
In what way does 11 instances of nothing differ from 1instance or no
instance?
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:
You are correct however file manager in addition to alignment
Takes 0cl As a group item
Was wondering if there is anyway to code an array of a group item
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 26, 2014, at 4:30 PM, Rob van der Heij wrote:
>
> What is 11 times "no string of 33 characters" ? Are you
What is 11 times "no string of 33 characters" ? Are you sure you need 11
empty strings rather than 10 ?
nnCL33 is "nn" times a field of type C and length 33. When "nn" is 0 you
don't actually allocate but only align. Which is why you see 0F or 0D. But
for type "C" there is no alignment...
On 26
Hi
This is really a follow up to my file manager question I would like to define a
array of a group item
So I coded for example 110cl33
Where I meant 11 x 0cl33
However for the assembler it read it as 110 x 33
Is there a way to code 11 x 0cl33
Thanks
Sent from my iPhone
You would just allocate some memory and then save the pointer to it. The
maximum size of that amount would be the upper limit. You would keep a pointer
to the last known 'end' for the rest of it. Pretty basic.
On Tue, 11/25/14, ASSEMBLER-LIST automa
It's not cobol the copybook/dsect is assembler I am hoping that when I hit the
array section of the record I'm able to pf8/ page forward
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 26, 2014, at 2:12 AM, Dougie Lawson wrote:
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> What does your COBOL copybook look like?
>
> The usual way is
11 matches
Mail list logo
