DLLs on z/OS can be stored in PDSEs as well. But that does not help you for
z/VSE...
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List On Behalf
Of Dave Clark
Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2023 1:05 PM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Calling C functions from
I don't believe VSE supports DLLs, so this may be all for naught. Unless VSE
has a non-DLL LDAP library.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List On Behalf
Of Dave Clark
Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2023 12:43 PM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re:
I got it working. Didn't properly allocate automatic (stack) storage for the
parameters in the earlier example.
prntit2 ceeentry main=YES,auto=AUTOSZ
ceepcall printf,(fmtstr,3,str),,mf=(E,PARMS3)
ceeterm
ppa ceeppa ,
fmtstr dcc'Test %d: %s.',x'0'
str dc
It looks like CEEPCALL is used to call DLL functions.
However I've not gotten it to work yet. This is what I've tried for printf():
prntit2 ceeentry main=YES
ceepcall printf,(fmtstr,3,str),,mf=(E,PARMS3)
ceeterm
ppa ceeppa ,
fmtstr dcc'Test %d: %s.',x'0'
str dc
Here's a simple call to printf from LE-enabled assembler.
ceedsa ,
ceecaa ,
prntit ceeentry main=YES
call PRINTF,(fmtstr,3)
ceeterm
ppa ceeppa ,
fmtstr dcc'Test %d!',x'0'
end prntit
Output is:
Test 3!
-Original Message-
From:
I'm actually working with LE messages right now. Not CEEMSG specifically, but
a combination of:
1) Custom LE conditions and messages
2) CEECMI to add an "insert" to a message represented by a condition token
3) CEEMGET to retrieve the formatted message from a condition token
Best place to start
at pitfall.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU]
On Behalf Of Swarbrick, Frank
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2023 12:37 AM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: alternative to USAGE statement?
Well, t
vary.
The latter I would call USING/DROP; I don't have a name for the former.
Perhaps "computed offset"?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU]
On Behalf Of Swarbrick, Frank
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 20
20 year amateur assembler programmer here.
Sometimes I see macro expansions (and just open code) with code like the
following.
L 12,X'14'(,12)
AH12,AFLENG-DFHAFCB(,12)
L 12,AFPFXLEN+AFTKTCB-AFTSTART(,12)
LLGT 12,UKTCB_ACTIVE_TASK-DFHUKTCB(,12)
I also have some questions.
1) What host components are required for Zowe. It it just configuring z/OSMF
as described here:
https://docs.zowe.org/stable/user-guide/systemrequirements-zosmf.html? Is
there additional z/OS software that needs to be installed, or is it "simply" a
matter of
=jK1beERCkCvANh8cumSQsPDIpEWjtP0Fb8UADR6ko-E=
From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] on behalf
of Swarbrick, Frank [frank.swarbr...@efirstbank.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2020 4:36 PM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re
What Rexx implementations support the latter syntax?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List On Behalf
Of Seymour J Metz
Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2020 1:54 PM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: The Condition Code as a return value from a called
"Why isn't the length attribute of a DSECT its actual length?"
I don't have a good answer, but I do have a related RFE you can vote for. For
all the good it will do, as it's never received a response from IBM as far as I
can tell...
Doesn't RACF or other access control protect this data equally?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Jon Perryman
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2017 11:40 AM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re:
I think someone else said it was choosing EBCDIC over ASCII. Personally I think
that one's worth, because apparently it will never be "fixed".
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Charles Mills
Sent: Monday, December
Until it runs out of ink.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On
Behalf Of John McKown
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2017 2:57 PM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: interesting, to me, new z14 instruction: BIC
On
You say "COBOL, and other LE languages, use only standard linkage". Is this
true for 64-bit C/C++ and PL/I? Isn't the pragma linkage in C and the extern
"linkage specifier" used to specify alternative linkages? The 2002 and 2014
COBOL standards support an "ENTRY-CONVENTION" clause in the
Oh I know. We've already stated the direction to not use this method going
forward. But with 30+ years of legacy code in place that uses it...
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Peter Hunkeler
Sent: Thursday, May
We have this "technique" as well. Interestingly, at least the last time I
checked, it still works (causes the S0C7) if the packed decimal field is signed
(PIC S9), but not if its unsigned (PIC 9).
What is the fix? When was it released?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Assembler
Correction to my "simple" code:
TM0(R6),UEPPSB1
JOPSBFUNC
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Swarbrick, Frank
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 11:44 AM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSE
The LOAD ON CONDITION instruction is quite interesting, and the 'obvious'
answer in this case. Thanks for pointing it out!
Funny thing is, with the use of this instruction almost all cases where an SP
macro would be used in the code I am working with has almost entirely
disappeared. :-)
I am
This is exactly true. That being said, I don't know how structured programming
macros can be used for 100% of your code if you want to also use the minimum
number of instructions possible. These two things appear to be in conflict.
For example, I did this simple code:
IF
er you can sense that RENT was specified for the
assembly. _RENT is the boolean system set symbol that indicates this.
Perhaps you can turn the problem on its head? After all, your macro must be
issued before the first section is started to get ahead of the ESDs, right?
On 02/15/2016 06:16 PM, S
I don't see how this might be possible, but no harm in asking. I am writing a
simple macro which can be used to insert an appropriate SETOPT line to set the
link/bind REUS attribute:
MACRO ,
REUS
AIF ('' EQ 'RENT').OPTRENT
AIF ('' EQ 'NONE').SETREUS
] On
Behalf Of Tony Harminc
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 11:57 AM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: load logical halfword immediate
On 20 January 2016 at 14:21, Swarbrick, Frank <frank.swarbr...@efirstbank.com>
wrote:
> I don't want IILF because it uses a ful
Is there any such instruction? This would be an instruction that would:
- Be a register-and-immediate instruction, with a halfword immediate
value as the source.
- Load the halfword in bytes 48-63.
- Load zeroes in bytes 32-47.
- Leave bytes 1-31
of LQ results in ASMA080E?!)
WAVV disbanded almost two years ago due to declining attendance.
VSE presentation content is now available via the VM Workshop. The next
workshop will be at the end of June at Rutgers University.
See http://vmworkshop.org.
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 9:03 PM, Swarbrick
What happened to WAVV?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Rich Smrcina
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2016 12:59 PM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: Use of LQ results in ASMA080E?!
Such a requirement
Hi David,
I used LE for a couple of reasons:
- I like the use of AUTO/STACK storage, as it is automatically
allocated, is reentrant, and works both in batch and under CICS.
- I’m now “used” to it.
How much overhead is it really? Since I’m calling it from COBOL then the LE
Hi Steve,
Not sure how I managed to use DS 0C there.
The thought to my indexing was to have code that would essentially say:
- Point argument 1 to MODNAME
- Point argument 2 to MODSIZE
- Point R5 to argument 3
So in "pseudo-assembler", where [n] represents a subscript I might have
something
30 matches
Mail list logo
