Re: Bogus ASMA307E?

2016-12-20 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On 2016-12-20, at 17:19, Webster, Chris wrote: > What is your initial using for r13? Is DLTABLE part of that dsect? > That shouldn't matter for a dependent USING which is supposed to map one DSECT over part of another DSECT. There's some Bad History here. Warnings for overlapping USINGs and

Re: Bogus ASMA307E?

2016-12-20 Thread Webster, Chris
is: USING DBST,DBSTm ...chris. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf Of Steve Smith Sent: December-20-16 10:15 AM To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU Subject: Re: Bogus ASMA307E? Well, I found a work-around: *USING

Re: Bogus ASMA307E?

2016-12-20 Thread Steve Smith
Well, I found a work-around: *USING DLTABD,DLTABLE This fails w/ASMA307E USING DLTABD-4000,DLTABLE-4000 Trick to fool HLASM My brain exploded trying to figure out the workarounds in the old postings. On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Steve Smith

Re: Bogus ASMA307E?

2016-12-20 Thread Steve Smith
Well if that's the design, then the design is an ass. But I don't see how that's the case, as the manual says otherwise. I finally found Robert Ngan's nearly identical post from 2 years ago, and several older ones, too. There was one reference that implied IBM won't fix it because of

Re: Bogus ASMA307E?

2016-12-20 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On 2016-12-20, at 09:13, Steve Smith wrote: > I'm getting an error on a dependent USING apparently just because it's out > of the normal 12-bit offset range... > > This seems to be a HLASM bug to me. > No. WAD. This has been discussed here before. (No, I don't like it.) -- gil

Bogus ASMA307E?

2016-12-20 Thread Steve Smith
I'm getting an error on a dependent USING apparently just because it's out of the normal 12-bit offset range... 04D0 E310 DCE0 0171 1CE0 1760 LAY R1,DLTABLE 1761 USING DLTABD,DLTABLE ** ASMA307E No active USING for