On 1 March 2014 00:12, Robert A. Rosenberg a...@rarpsl.com wrote:
Making STUFF stuff Stuff sTuff ... have different meanings is not as
fault-tolerant as it could be.
OTOH: Polish and polish ARE not the same. Telling someone in the army
to You should Polish your shoes so you will pass
On 2014-02-25, at 10:00, John Walker wrote:
So, to respond to the one comment, it was ok for the Science guys to want
mixed case things because that was what they were used to. Ok, I can buy
that. Same rationale can be applied to the C programmers. Now, let's be
fair, using the very
I think this discussion needs to distinguish clearly between case-sensitive
(treating caps and lower case the same) and case-insensitive (treating the
upper and lower case of the same character as different). Mixed-case
could mean either, and is therefore unclear.
IMHO, case-insensitivity is not
IBM Mainframe Assembler List ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU wrote on
02/28/2014 11:18:33 AM:
From: Hobart Spitz orexx...@gmail.com
I think this discussion needs to distinguish clearly between
case-sensitive
(treating caps and lower case the same) and case-insensitive (treating
the
upper and
I should be be on John Walker's side if 'z/OS' were telling him that
he may no longer write his routines in headlines. As it is, what he
appears to be saying is that I must write mine in headlines too; and I
am unsympathetic, even hostile to that notion.
He is and should be free to continue what
At 11:18 -0500 on 02/28/2014, Hobart Spitz wrote about Re: CamelCase
(was: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest ...):
I think this discussion needs to distinguish clearly between case-sensitive
(treating caps and lower case the same) and case-insensitive (treating the
upper and lower case of the same
At 11:28 -0500 on 02/28/2014, Kirk Talman wrote about Re: CamelCase
(was: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest ...):
Making STUFF stuff Stuff sTuff ... have different meanings is not as
fault-tolerant as it could be.
OTOH: Polish and polish ARE not the same. Telling someone in the army
to You should Polish
