@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: Subject: RSECT vs CSECT
> Is there any advantage to using RSECT over CSECT with PARM=RENT?
One might say that there is advantage in having the definition within the
source rather than relying on a build parameter to ask for the sort of checking
you'd get.
And, of cou
> Is there any advantage to using RSECT over CSECT with PARM=RENT?
One might say that there is advantage in having the definition within the
source rather than relying on a build parameter to ask for the sort of checking
you'd get.
And, of course, RSECT vs CSECT is passed as information to the
mbler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU]
On Behalf Of Peter Relson
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2022 4:51 AM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: Subject: ASMA500 message question
You ignore the message at your own risk.
Unless your module is page-aligned and this is a page-aligned CS
Nucleus.
Keith
Sent from an iPhone
> On Nov 18, 2022, at 09:50, Peter Relson wrote:
>
> You ignore the message at your own risk.
>
> Unless your module is page-aligned and this is a page-aligned CSECT within
> that module, you have no idea if the CSECT will land on a quadword (or
>
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 7:50 AM Peter Relson wrote:
>
> Why would you not want to use GOFF? I can think of only one module in all
> of z/OS that cannot use GOFF. I'll let guesses occur before providing the
> answer in a day or two.
>
> Fear of the unknown!
I will try it.
Mike S.
You ignore the message at your own risk.
Unless your module is page-aligned and this is a page-aligned CSECT within that
module, you have no idea if the CSECT will land on a quadword (or stronger)
boundary.
And if you truly need quadword boundary and don't have it, things won't end
well.
of Peter Relson [rel...@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2022 8:47 AM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: Subject: MVCRL
Why isn't there a Move Relative Long instruction
The answer is likely because there is insufficient reason to have one, to
justify the cost.
Instructions
Why isn't there a Move Relative Long instruction
The answer is likely because there is insufficient reason to have one, to
justify the cost.
Instructions are typically created when they solve a problem and, often, when
they can be done faster if implemented in the machine than if done piece
I was not sure what you were asking about since you did not include a snippet
of the discussion from the Digest. It helps if you could put a better subject
on the thread and include some of the details from the Digest you are asking
about.
COD (Capacity on Demand) offers solutions
Peter Hunkeler writes:
I'd appreciate people responding to digest message would take a little care
> of adding a meaningful subject. And include some snippets of the text
> you're referring to.
Indeed! It's a peeve of mine as well. I also appreciate people stripping
irrelevant content
pond to the individual post,
> instead of
> > trying to reply to the digest mail. Even when you modify the subject,
> your
> > response would not thread into the discussion for next day's digest, nor
> >
> Are messages are threaded by Subject or by In-Reply-to? I thi
On 2016-06-22, at 00:50, Rob van der Heij wrote:
>
> An interesting idea might be to sign up for the web interface at
> listserv.uga.edu and use that to respond to the individual post, instead of
> trying to reply to the digest mail. Even when you modify the subject, your
>
On 22 June 2016 at 08:07, Peter Hunkeler <p...@gmx.ch> wrote:
> I'd appreciate people responding to digest message would take a little
> care of adding a meaningful subject. And include some snippets of the text
> you're referring to.
>
> --
> Peter Hunkeler
>
I'd appreciate people responding to digest message would take a little care of
adding a meaningful subject. And include some snippets of the text you're
referring to.
--
Peter Hunkeler
Von: John Walker <00c645a0d640-dmarc-requ...@listserv.uga.edu> An:
ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.U
A bunch of adminstrivia:
- the very interesting discussion about dump reading/learning dump
reading/etc today would be a lot more accessible in the archives if the
subject included something about 'dumps' rather than '3 job openings for
mainframe Assembler/C programmers'. You can change
System will always be able to answer a request for 64 bit - If you make
it
conditional it will tell you that it resolved from below the bar (if
the area above the bar is exhausted). Scott, what would stop you
using z-arch-instructions to handle it?
That is not the way 64-bit storage works in
What's the new Instruction that replaces the old BAL R14,s ?
By new do you mean 30 years old? If so, the BAS answer seems correct.
If you mean only 15 or so years old, perhaps BRAS is the answer you seek
(I did not look up just when the relative-immediate facility was
introduced).
Peter
IIRC, some models of the S/360 had a BAS instruction. But I don't have
an old S/360 POPS to make sure exactly what it did.
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 6:52 AM, Peter Relson rel...@us.ibm.com wrote:
What's the new Instruction that replaces the old BAL R14,s ?
By new do you mean 30 years old? If
The 360/67 had a Branch and Store (BAS, BASR) to deal with 32-bit virtual
addresses.
Mike
At 07:25 AM 4/10/2013 -0500, you wrote:
IIRC, some models of the S/360 had a BAS instruction. But I don't have
an old S/360 POPS to make sure exactly what it did.
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 6:52 AM, Peter
John McKown noted...
IIRC, some models of the S/360 had a BAS instruction. But I don't have
an old S/360 POPS to make sure exactly what it did.
My old System/360 Green Card has no BAS, but I believe it was available on
Models 20 and 67. I don't think it would have been in the 360 PoP.
John
, 2013 12:53 PM
Subject: Re: Subject: New BAL
John McKown noted...
IIRC, some models of the S/360 had a BAS instruction. But I don't have
an old S/360 POPS to make sure exactly what it did.
My old System/360 Green Card has no BAS, but I believe it was available on
Models 20 and 67. I don't think
scott_j_f...@yahoo.com
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Date: 04/10/2013 12:14 PM
Subject: Re: Subject: New BAL
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Assembler List ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
John,
Now you say it seem to remember it on a 360/20 . I learned BAL at
that time on a 360/20
Scott J
/access/text/2010/05/102678081-05-01-acc.pdf
Regards,
John K
IBM Mainframe Assembler List ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU wrote on
04/10/2013 12:01:44 PM:
From: Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Date: 04/10/2013 12:14 PM
Subject: Re: Subject: New BAL
Sent
This green card documents BAS as Branch and Store with footnote (e)
Model 67.
http://archive.computerhistory.org/resources/access/text/2010/05/102678081-05-01-acc.pdf
Must be newer (and therefore less green) than mine (X20-1703-3).
://www.identityforge.com/
From: John Ehrman ehr...@us.ibm.com
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 12:53 PM
Subject: Re: Subject: New BAL
John McKown noted...
IIRC, some models of the S/360 had a BAS instruction. But I don't
John Ehrman wrote:
This green card documents BAS as Branch and Store with footnote (e)
Model 67.
http://archive.computerhistory.org/resources/access/text/2010/05/102678081-05-01-acc.pdf
Must be newer (and therefore less green) than mine (X20-1703-3).
BAS/BASR first appeared in GX20-1703-9,
Subject: Re: Subject: New BAL
John Ehrman wrote:
This green card documents BAS as Branch and Store with footnote (e)
Model 67.
http://archive.computerhistory.org/resources/access/text/2010/05/102678081-05-01-acc.pdf
Must be newer (and therefore less green) than mine (X20-1703-3
: Bob Rutledge deerh...@ix.netcom.com
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 2:56:10 PM
Subject: Re: Subject: New BAL
John Ehrman wrote:
This green card documents BAS as Branch and Store with footnote (e)
Model 67.
http://archive.computerhistory.org/resources/access
@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU]
On Behalf Of Michael Stack
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 11:30 AM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: Subject: New BAL
The blue card itself can be seen at
http://archive.michigan-terminal-system.org/documentation/documents/IBM360-6
7RefCard.pdf
Mike
At 01:15 PM 4/10/2013 -0500
Sorry to here it...and wish your family well.
Will be missed...
From: Chris Mason chrisma...@belgacom.net
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Date: 01/10/2013 06:17 PM
Subject:Re:
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Assembler List
ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Hello to you
Hello to you all,
I'm Milena, Chris Mason's daughter.
I'm writing to you, to inform you that, unfortunately, dad passed away on
Sunday January 6th.
The funeral service will be held next Thursday January 17th in
Court-Saint-Etienne, Belgium.
If you wish to attend, please send me an e-mail to
I am shocked and saddened. My thoughts and prayers are with you.
On Jan 10, 2013 6:14 PM, Chris Mason chrisma...@belgacom.net wrote:
Hello to you all,
I'm Milena, Chris Mason's daughter.
I'm writing to you, to inform you that, unfortunately, dad passed away on
Sunday January 6th.
The
Hi
Very very said .
Just yesterday noticed his comments on the TCP/IP newsgroup, kindly
joking about my bad English.
You have my sympathy.
On 11.01.2013 01:09, Chris Mason wrote:
Hello to you all,
I'm Milena, Chris Mason's daughter.
I'm writing to you, to inform you that, unfortunately,
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: Subject: AW: ** ASMA030E Invalid literal usage - =CL8'MARTINWH'
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Peter Relson rel...@us.ibm.com wrote:
I hope that any usage of LPP is solely for theoretical /
experimental purposes. It is not intended for use outside
I hope that any usage of LPP is solely for theoretical / experimental
purposes. It is not intended for use outside of the operating system,
which is presumably part of the reason that it is not in the principles of
operation.
Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology Design
I am out of the office until Monday 7/16//2012. I will read your note, as time
permits, when I return to the office. If your e-mail is urgent and concerns a
production issue/problem, please send your note to the 'GLO-RETS zOS Content'
mailbox for attention.
Thanks!
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Peter Relson rel...@us.ibm.com wrote:
I hope that any usage of LPP is solely for theoretical / experimental
purposes. It is not intended for use outside of the operating system,
which is presumably part of the reason that it is not in the principles of
On Jul 12, 2012, at 08:24, Rob van der Heij wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Peter Relson rel...@us.ibm.com wrote:
I hope that any usage of LPP is solely for theoretical / experimental
purposes. It is not intended for use outside of the operating system,
which is presumably part of
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List
[mailto:ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 10:59 AM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Subject: Re: Subject: AW: ** ASMA030E Invalid literal usage -
=CL8'MARTINWH'
snip
On 2012-07-12 16:33, Edward Jaffe wrote:
On 7/12/2012 9:56 AM, McKown, John wrote:
Which is totally simplistic these days. You bought your cell phone, right? Do
you really think that you can do anything to it that you want to? And that it
is totally documented? In today's IP is __mine__ world,
Maybe there's hope:
http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/b2g/
--
Regards, Gord Tomlin
Action Software International
(a division of Mazda Computer Corporation)
Tel: (905) 470-7113, Fax: (905) 470-6507
On 2012-07-12 19:28, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On 2012-07-12 16:33, Edward Jaffe wrote:
On 7/12/2012
delete ASSEMBLER-LIST kmpor...@us.ibm.com
http://mannen-tassen.nl/test.php?html103
On 7/26/2011 5:30 PM, John McKown wrote:
Smarter phising, I'd guess. They now monitor the lists and determine
whose id to spoof. Then post with that id in order to make people think
it is legit.
Keep that in mind the next time you get an email from me saying you can cure
your ED woes. Hey, I
-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Date: 07/26/2011 05:39 PM
Subject: Re:
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Assembler List ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
http://redacted
--
John McKown
Maranatha!
On Wed, Jul 27th, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Jean Snow j...@uga.edu wrote:
You may be right, John. But this did come from hotmail (I checked the
logs) which is msn.com. So it may be John G's account is compromised,
and
I set him to review just in case.
Maybe ...
Every so often I get batches of
Smarter phising, I'd guess. They now monitor the lists and determine whose id
to spoof. Then post with that id in order to make people think it is
legit.
Not that much smarter: the mannen-tassen in the url is Dutch for Man
purses. Would anybody in this group be that interested in man purses?
Im trying to Familiarize my self with the IEAMSCHD macro.
So I put together a program which has the Scheduling Routine,FRR and RMT
routine as individual CSECTS.
Im interested in the interaction, this is not intended for any actual use.
IEAMSCHD EPADDR=SRBRTN@,
John,
here is the full citation:
Macros are only useful as IBM has used them.� Other than that,
macros have no value.�
What you are saying is that only IBM know what to do with macros. Or
maybe IBM knows best what to do with macros and all others should avoid
them.
Here is a sample that
On 9/9/2010 12:14 AM, Fred van der Windt wrote:
Once my erroneous comma is removed, you can walk a lot further.
Read John Ehrman's article, as cited earlier by Michael Stack:
http://www.kcats.org/csci/464/ho/usingtechnique.shtml
Not really. The offset will still and always allow you to
Well
As demonstrated by this very discussion the first form will baffle just about
any programmer. And the 'missing' comma is (at least with us) a bad habit as
well.
LAR3,-4(R2) Set R3 to 4 less than R2
or:
LAR3,4092(R1,R2) Set R3 to 4 less than R2
my email address was change and I'm just making sure I can post to this
forum. Please ignore this message.
Stan Weyman
Senior Software Engineer
stan.wey...@emc.commailto:weyman_s...@emc.com
EMC² *(508)249-3966
where information lives
It is wise to keep in mind that neither
success nor
John Gilmore Ashland, MA 01721-1817 USA
53 matches
Mail list logo
