Thanks! I was using (and should have mentioned) the 2.1 version. Not that
I see any change bars, but that version has "0-1 Used as work registers by
the system".
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 11:34:10 -0400 Steve
Steve,
Also very the called Assembler subroutine isn't doing I/O below the line and
verify your LE parms are ALL31(ON) , which is one of many to be careful of
with LE.
Scott
On Monday, July 11, 2016, John McKown wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Steve
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Steve Thompson wrote:
> I am trying to determine how I am supposed to know if a COBOL program is
> AMODE=31/ANY when they call an ALC subroutine.
>
> The routine getting control has just been through an upgrade from 1979
> style of NOREUS and
Look at the Test Addressing Mode (TAM) instruction,
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Steve Thompson wrote:
> I am trying to determine how I am supposed to know if a COBOL program is
> AMODE=31/ANY when they call an ALC subroutine.
>
> The routine getting control has just
I am trying to determine how I am supposed to know if a COBOL
program is AMODE=31/ANY when they call an ALC subroutine.
The routine getting control has just been through an upgrade from
1979 style of NOREUS and data mixed in with instructions.
Also, this routine is not LE conforming. It has
On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 11:34:10 -0400 Steve Smith wrote:
:>Can anyone tell me how CSRC4RGT/CSRC4RG1 works? I've read and re-read, but
:>as best as I can tell, there's no information on how the caller actually
:>obtains the cell address.
:>If not, I'll have to start
It appears it is returned in R1.
Gary Weinhold
Senior Application Architect
DATAKINETICS | Data Performance & Optimization
Phone +1.613.523.5500 x216
Email: weinh...@dkl.com
Visit us online at www.DKL.com
E-mail Notification: The information contained in this email and any
Can anyone tell me how CSRC4RGT/CSRC4RG1 works? I've read and re-read, but
as best as I can tell, there's no information on how the caller actually
obtains the cell address.
If not, I'll have to start experimenting.
--
sas