Re: Did IBM replace all format RXE with RXY ?

2017-01-19 Thread somitcw
Thank you. Finally something that makes the author's intentions clear. (rant) But, an unqualified "All previously existing format-RSE and format-RXE instructions are changed - - - " should be read as written. The reader should not need to read into the paragraph what is not there. The words

Re: Did IBM replace all format RXE with RXY ?

2017-01-18 Thread Ed Jaffe
On 1/17/2017 7:38 AM, somitcw wrote: Does IBM plan to back-off the change from RXE to RXY and go in a different direction or are they just sloppy about keeping the first part of the manual insync with the rest? According to Dan Greiner, the Principles of Operation is accurate and IBM is

Re: Did IBM replace all format RXE with RXY ?

2017-01-17 Thread Steve Smith
How bizarre. I assumed that the RXE->RXY transition was fundamental, and RXE-format was completely superseded. The -10 version of PoOp still shows RXE format for BFP instructions. There are a couple of odd DFP instructions that are documented as RXE, but DFP is mostly register-only. HFP of

Re: Did IBM replace all format RXE with RXY ?

2017-01-17 Thread Jonathan Scott
Ref: Your note of Tue, 17 Jan 2017 10:38:47 -0500 It appears that the Summary of Changes is incorrect. The floating point RXE instructions did not change to RXY format. Jonathan Scott IBM Hursley, UK

Did IBM replace all format RXE with RXY ?

2017-01-17 Thread somitcw
SA22-7832-02.zArch.Principles.of.Operations.Jun.2003.pdf claims: Page xxii to xxiii "All previously existing format-RSE and format-RXE instructions are changed to be of formats RSY and RXY, respectively, by use of a previously unused byte in the instructions. These changes are not marked by a bar