Re: SPM bugs

2010-12-06 Thread Andreas F. Geissbuehler
john gilmore wrote, elaborating on syntax and expressions: Authoritarian schemes--Programming languages constructed as dialects of Newspeak, Was its nicht erlaubt ist verboten, and the like--are always misconceived. Agree. ;-)) and its has no validity in this syntax and should have been

Re: SPM bugs

2010-12-06 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Dec 6, 2010, at 03:48, D E Engelbrecht wrote: Authoritarian schemes--Programming languages constructed as dialects of Newspeak, Was its nicht erlaubt ist verboten, and the like--are always misconceived. 'misconceived' - Agreed. For the purists: Was ist nicht erlaubt is verboten (What

Re: SPM bugs

2010-12-06 Thread Sam Siegel
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote: On Dec 6, 2010, at 03:48, D E Engelbrecht wrote: Authoritarian schemes--Programming languages constructed as dialects of Newspeak, Was its nicht erlaubt ist verboten, and the like--are always misconceived.

Re: SPM bugs

2010-12-06 Thread Bill Fairchild
For a fuller exposition of verboten und/oder erlaubt, a recent Russian textbook of mine had this Soviet-era joke (with my translation): In England, what is allowed is allowed, but what is forbidden is forbidden. In Germany, everything is forbidden except that which is allowed. In America,

Re: SPM bugs

2010-12-06 Thread Martin Trübner
Bill, that makes sense From a German

Re: SPM bugs

2010-12-06 Thread Bill Fairchild
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU Subject: Re: SPM bugs Bill, that makes sense From a German

Re: SPM bugs

2010-12-04 Thread john gilmore
Fred van der Windt wrote: begin snippet Ah. So if I code a macro invocation with parameters that do not meet the documented specification of that macro, but the macro ignores the incorrect parameters and uses the remaining parameters to generate some code anyway without any mention of