[Assp-test] DelayHC (1.7.1.0 RC)

2010-02-25 Thread Jens-Martin Groenne
How does the DelayHC setting work, I think it is a bit unclear in the interface: The heading says: HomeCountry Pass Greylisting The description says: Enable Greylisting for HomeCountry based IPs. So does that mean that when this is enabled it will delay IPs from HomeCountry? I have tried

Re: [Assp-test] Traps don't work anymore in 1.7.1.0

2010-02-25 Thread Thilo.Klein
Thank you for changing your mind, but there was a small error introduced after changing back. In the two code lines } elsif (!$this-{relayok} ( ($spamaddresses !$this-{nocollect} matchSL( $u$h,

Re: [Assp-test] Traps don't work anymore in 1.7.1.0

2010-02-25 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt: but there was a small error introduced after changing back. already changed, sorry -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software

[Assp-test] Feature suggestion. Message scoring warning range Re.

2010-02-25 Thread Paul K. Dickson
I¹d like to see a regex option for key words that perhaps you always want to fall in the warning range and not be scored otherwise(for those of us with a primarily scoring setup). Obviously only if they are not whitelisted. There are select words that I know always have a decent (50/50)~ (60/40)

Re: [Assp-test] [SPAM][!] Re: [SPAM][!] Feature suggestion. Message scoring warni

2010-02-25 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt: Fritz: That only works if the recipient is in the associated, or all spamlovers category. I'd like it to work for everyone in my domain for certain words, but certainly not everyone in the domain for all words(aka, I don't

Re: [Assp-test] [SPAM][!] Feature suggestion. Message scoring warning range Re.

2010-02-25 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt: Id rather they automatically be tagged and passed. Regular Expression to Identify SpamLover* (SpamLoversRe) If a message matches this regular expression it will be considered a SpamLover message.

Re: [Assp-test] [SPAM][!] Feature suggestion. Message scoring warning range Re.

2010-02-25 Thread Hill, Brett
Paul K. Dickson wrote: Fritz: That only works if the recipient is in the associated, or all spamlovers category. I'd like it to work for everyone in my domain for certain words, but certainly not everyone in the domain for all words(aka, I don't want to add everyone to spamlovers).

Re: [Assp-test] [SPAM][!] Feature suggestion. Message scoring warning range Re.

2010-02-25 Thread Paul K. Dickson
Oh. :-/ Paul == red in the face :D. Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick County Government, IIT pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399 From: Fritz Borgstedt f...@iworld.de Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Thu, 25 Feb

Re: [Assp-test] [SPAM][!] Feature suggestion. Message scoring warning range Re.

2010-02-25 Thread Paul K. Dickson
All correct except I didn't request if it were to a spam lover. I want it passed if it is spam, and it matches that phrase.. Regardless if they are in spamlovers or not. I don't want all spam to go to everyone.. Aka I don't want everyone to be spamlovers of all mail.. Only mail with the keywords

Re: [Assp-test] Feature suggestion. Message scoring warning range Re

2010-02-25 Thread Fritz Borgstedt
ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt: All correct except I didn't request if it were to a spam lover. I want it passed if it is spam, and it matches that phrase.. Regardless if they are in spamlovers or not. I don't want all spam to go to everyone.. Aka I don't

Re: [Assp-test] Feature suggestion. Message scoring warning range Re

2010-02-25 Thread Paul K. Dickson
It doesn't seem to be checking the spamloverre then. I've tested several different times and can't get it to recognize the keywords. Not in a real email test or the analyzer web interface. Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick County Government, IIT pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov

Re: [Assp-test] [SPAM][!] Re: [SPAM][!] Feature suggestion. Message scoring warni

2010-02-25 Thread Paul K. Dickson
I put a few phrases in SpamLoversRe(both plain words and plain words surrounded by '\b'). I then sent an email from a non-whitelisted account with those phrases as well as several I have in blackre and bombre, to a non-spamlover account. The mail was not recognized as a spam-lover email even

[Assp-test] DNSBL - cache edits and noRBL

2010-02-25 Thread K Post
I've got a problem where notifications from facebook are being rejected due to being on a couple DNSBL services. I've got validateRBL set to block. The behavior is normal. I tried to make an exception for the ranges 69.63.178.0-69.63.178.255 and 69.63.184.0-69.63.184.255 by putting these in the

Re: [Assp-test] Feature suggestion. Message scoring warning range Re

2010-02-25 Thread Paul K. Dickson
Moved to rc2 w/ out any changes to my config and it¹s working now in the web interface. I assume it is elsewhere. Thanks Fritz! Paul K. Dickson Systems Administrator Frederick County Government, IIT pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov 301-600-2399/x12399 From: Paul K. Dickson

[Assp-test] 1.7.1 rc 0.01.005 rc0.02.00, bad attachment, message OK.

2010-02-25 Thread Paul K. Dickson
This should be placed in the appropriate collecting location, should it not? Certainly shouldn¹t be ³Message OK² w/ a bad attachment. Feb-24-10 22:24:22 -- Message OK -- [NISH Academy Online eLearning Courses What s In It]; Feb-24-10 23:41:55 72910-00680 [BombSubject] 64.18.3.32