[Assp-test] ARC (Authenticated Received Chain) & ASSP

Hi Thomas, just wondering if there is anything that ASSP needs to do to support this, or is it just for mailing list software? ARC Specification for Email draft-jones-arc-usage-00 - Recommended Usage of the Authenticated Received Chain (ARC)

Re: [Assp-test] Conditional DNS Forwarders

-bump- On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 10:12 AM, K Post wrote: > Another thought: Would it make any sense for ASSP to have 2 sets of DNS > servers, with the second set (optional) being used for those services that > would not work well with a dns server that forwards? Then we

Re: [Assp-test] Max Number Duplicate File Names

Isn't that exact same logic an argument for having the maximum number of duplicate subjects apply to the HAM / notspam folder too? 5000 or 15000 of the same message sent individually by (untrainable / apathetic) users would fill the notspam folder and mess up HMM / Bayesian right? And for those

Re: [Assp-test] Max Number Duplicate File Names

I have: UseSubjectsAsMaillogNames - ticked MaxAllowedDups - 5 MaintBayesCollection - ticked MaxBayesFileAge - 21 I was actually surprised by this, I could have sworn that in the past ASSP used to check when saving messages. I would see lines in the logs during message receipt saying something

Re: [Assp-test] Max Number Duplicate File Names

MaxAllowedDups - forces spam mails that exceeds this limit to be moved to the discarded folder. What should be done with HAM mails, that have the same subject (like RE: or FW: - without any additionaly text) - but possibly a different content ? >sends out a newsletter monthly ASSP has several

Re: [Assp-test] Max Number Duplicate File Names

I agree with this. I have a user that sends out a newsletter monthly to ~50,000 users, and it completely wipes out my notspam collection every time, with 15,000 almost identical copies of the same email. I wait until the newsletter send has completed, and then I restore the notspam files from a

Re: [Assp-test] mail breakes the DKIM rules defined in the DMARC record for domain

DMARC requires both 'DoDKIM' and 'ValidateSPF' - the resulting action on a failed DMARC check, is the lowest configured action from both. The DMARC check is a header check - so we do not have a 100% valid DKIM result at this state. The DMARC check collects all domains from DKIM signatures and

Re: [Assp-test] Max Number Duplicate File Names

Just think about the logic behind Bayesian and HMM - this will answer your question. Having the same mail in the spam folder multiple times, this will score the content to extreme spam havy, even your users are using the same content - but less often. Thomas Von:K Post

Re: [Assp-test] ASSP_AFC Priority

Thanks The double slash is MY doing fyi. I have assp running in a different folder (d:\assp-antispam) and didn't want to confuse anything in my report. When I edited the warning, I inadvertently added the extra slash. It was fine in the warning itself. On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 4:35 AM, Thomas

Re: [Assp-test] Max Number Duplicate File Names

I know you're all RTFM, but there's plenty of places in the GUI where the description isn't exactly clear or right. For example MaxFiles If you're not using subjects as file names ( UseSubjectsAsMaillogNames ), this is the maximum number of files to keep in each collection (spam & nonspam) It's

[Assp-test] mail breakes the DKIM rules defined in the DMARC record for domain

2016-03-10 16:19:43 23183-510279 [Worker_1] 198.2.183.126

[Assp-test] my mistake - I'm sorry

Hi all, I've made a bad mistake in build 16070, which may cause problems with STARTTLS sessions. If you've downloaded this build before 15:20 GMT - please redownload it! I' sorry. Thomas DISCLAIMER: *** This email and any files

[Assp-test] test

das ist ein test Mit freundlichen Grüßen Thomas Eckardt mob:+49 1742002399 fax:+49 37203 7007 tel:+49 37203 7007 url:http://www.thockar.com org:thockar IT-Consulting adr:Hauptstrasse 278, Gersdorf, 09355, Deutschland/Germany email:thomas.ecka...@thockar.com DISCLAIMER:

[Assp-test] fixes in assp 2.4.8 build 16070

Hi all, fixed in assp 2.4.8 build 16070: - under certain conditions, assp was confused about Plugin-priorities check the priority setting of your installed Plugins and reset the value to the default - noTLSIP was not working for any destination IP address and the relayHost Thomas

Re: [Assp-test] ASSP_AFC Priority

>located at c:/assp/Plugins/ASSP_AFC.pm >located at c:/assp//Plugins/ASSP_AFC.pm This will be fixed in the next release. Thomas Von:K Post An: ASSP development mailing list Datum: 09.03.2016 23:32 Betreff:[Assp-test]

Re: [Assp-test] Max Number Duplicate File Names

>There are about 600 of those files in NotSpam. 'MaxAllowedDups','Max Number of Duplicate File Names' 'The maximum number of logged files with the same filename (subject) that are stored in the spam folder (spamlog), I'll write in Hebrew - possibly the english is better, if you

Re: [Assp-test] [feature suggestion] option to do DoNoSpoofing test only if A record of any MX record of recipient domain is in the list of LocalMXips (is still local domain)

>On larger system On larger systems - admins are professionals - they will know how to maintain 'localDomains' automaticaly. Thomas Von:"krz...@gmail.com " An: ASSP development mailing list Datum: 09.03.2016 23:44 Betreff:

Re: [Assp-test] [feature suggestion] option to do DoNoSpoofing only if sender domain if same as recipient domain

>but you can't be really sure if other domains in localDomain >list are still localDomains Don't use assp, if you are unable to maintain this list (manualy and/or LDAP and/or Groups). Thomas Von:"krz...@gmail.com " An: ASSP development mailing list