My 16036 installation, windows, all modules up to date is throwing this
warning over and over:
Warning: got unexpected signal SEGV in Worker_2: package - main, file -
c:\ASSP\assp.pl, line - 38599!
(many of them)
followed by a
Warning: try to terminate inactive/stucking Worker_2
[ fyi,
The reason I want it is the bonehead users who complain about spam but
won't report - you know, the ones who can fire you...This way, I can get a
list of subjects that they got and then report on their behalf.
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Robert K Coffman Jr. -Info From Data Corp.
Thank you both for adding your thoughts and really starting this discussion.
I know how to do what you're both suggesting (though in our case, mail goes
to several different end servers so parsing them would be a pain). The
simple grep of the maillog is what I've been doing, and that's fine, but
I'm getting some verbal reports of people getting spam, from some of my
more difficult users (despite clear instructions on how to report them).
Question:
How difficult would it be to have either a daily or on demand report that's
essentially the opposite of the block report? Show me everything
I added a bit. Confirm that this is correct? (see bold)
This feature replaces the above level definitions. If at least one valid
regular (not zip:...) attachment blocking rule is defined here, all level
definitions are ignored for all emails, *regardless of direction! This
means that if, for
t, but it exactly points out all required facts.
>
> If anybody is not able to understand
>
> "If the user name matches for a sender or recipient and a (in/out) regex
> definition is found in this file"
> and
> "all level definition are overwritten for this mai
ule - no check.
>
>
> If I define a zip: line for a specific user but not a non-zip: line, will
> the level 1,2,3,4 blocks still be effective?
>
> yes - zip: (as written in the doc) is an extension provided by AFC.
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
> Von:K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.c
s have to be made explicite.
> If you want to act AFC the same way for regular attachments and zip file
> content, you'll need two identical definitions - one without and one with
> the leading zip:
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
>
>
> Von:K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com>
> A
is inside a zip? I'm not
talking encrypted, just a regular zip.
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 9:55 AM, K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
> sorry, hit send by mistake
>
> If I put a line like
>
> zip: theuser@ourdomain => => good-out => crypt\-zip
>
> 1) that
ttachment handling for a person and different zip
handling for that same person, am I correct in saying that I'd use 2 lines
in userattach, one normal, and one prefixed with zip?
THANK YOU
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 9:49 AM, K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I've read and reread
I've read and reread the gui, but still am not completely clear.
Attachment blocking works well. We don't allow, in or out, the standard
stuff: exe, etc.
I've got ASSP_AFCblockEncryptedZIP checked, and that works well too.
My problem is that I've got 2 users who need to be able to send
Everything looks fine, but I got this warning seconds after doing a resend
mail from the admin UI. Alert came via email (log alert)
BerkeleyDB-ERROR: in building BerkeleyDB ENV - can't create BDB-ENV for
rebuild - see c:/assp/tmpDB/rebuildDB/BDB-error.txt
- BDB:BDB0087 DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal
ize 3700 bytes (size)!
>
> full line in log is:
>
> Feb-02-16 14:44:45 msg42285-06711 [[ip] <sen...@domain.coml> error:
> message exceeds maxSize 3700 bytes (size)!
> ------
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
> Von:K Post <nn
r a temp error the server may try again.
> So there are three possible reasons.
>
> 1. the sending server works bad and sends again after a 5xx reply
> 2. you've set maxSizeError to 4xx
> 3. the origin sender sends the mail again and again and
>
> Thomas
>
>
Is there a way of including the FULL line when a notifyRE matches.
For example, instead of the body of the notification email being something
like:
log event on host assp.domain.org:
error: message exceeds maxSize 3700 bytes (size)!
Have it be something like
log event on host
I just got
Warning: Main_Thread found socket without SocketCalls - please report!
This was right after getting a notice that a sender's trying to send a
message that exceeds max size.
It said to report, so I am.
ASSP version 2.4.8(16013)
Windows
message exceeds maxSize 3700 bytes (size)!
I've seen it several times know where maxsize is exceeded but the sender
keeps sending and sending and sending. ASSP is sending a NDR right and not
a retry later code to the sending server right?
It's definitely possible that the person sending
.
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
>
>
> Von:K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com>
> An: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Datum: 02.02.2016 17:57
> Betreff:[Assp-test] Warning: Main_Thread found socket without
> SocketCalls
<ji...@sohnen-moe.com> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 01/29/2016 11:10 AM, K Post wrote:
> > I see this on occasion:
> >
> ASSP version 2.4.5(15334)
> I have the same problem.
>
>
> 2016-02-01 08:32:24 Warning:
l plugins to there defaults.
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
>
>
> Von:K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com>
> An: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Datum: 01.02.2016 03:51
> Betreff:[Assp-test] Error runlevel errors
>
>
I periodically see errors like this:
ERROR: runlevel 'complete mail' - priority 34, requested by Plugin
'ASSP_AFC' (located at c:/ASSP/Plugins/ASSP_AFC.pm), is already occupied by
Plugin 'ASSP_AFC' (located at c:/ASSP/Plugins/ASSP_AFC.pm)
Not always with this plugin, just complaining about
I see this on occasion:
warning: can't find a name server registration for the sender domain '
ci.wilsonville.or.us' - all DNS queries will be skipped!
And it's not just a single host, I see this about once a week with various
domain names often cities co.geauga.oh.us and co.delaware.pa.us.
included in the
> Perl distro available at
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/assp/files/ASSP%20V2%20multithreading/ASSP%20V2%20module%20installation/
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
>
>
> Von:K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com>
> An: ASSP development mailing list <assp-
on
> 1.72 uses OpenSSL 1.0.2c 12 Jun 2015
>
> >I have NOT installed OpenSSL exe's.
>
> This is a fault.
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
> Von:K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com>
> An: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Dat
UPDATE
I removed Net:SSLeay and reinstalled.
I now see OpenSSL-lib 1.0.2c 12 Jun 2015 1.0.2c / 1.0.1h in the info.
GREAT.
I did NOT install OpenSSL exe's though. I guess that's my last question
for now, are you saying I need to?
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:16 AM, K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.
Just upgraded to 16013 on WINDOWS. Thanks for the continuous updates and
fixes.
I updated all perl modules that I could through PPM and the rest from CPAN
(buy unzipping) All seems well, however the info screen shows:
OpenSSL-lib 1.0.1l 15 Jan 2015 1.0.1l / 1.0.1h
I had asked about
rly the same like \p{Hebrew}+
>
> [אבגדהוזחטיכךלמםנןסעפףצץקרשת]+
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
> Von:K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com>
> An: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Datum: 11.01.2016 02:24
> Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] Multiple languages / charac
that's needed?
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Thomas Eckardt <thomas.ecka...@thockar.com>
wrote:
> Unicode will help
>
> the regular expression:
>
> \p{Hebrew}
>
> for example, will detect a singe hebrew character
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
> Von:
One of our users is bilingual and apparently switches between English and
Hebrew character set frequently This is the only user like this that I
know of.
I worry about not having enough HM / Bayes statistics on hebrew and I'd
hate to reduce the amount of English data if we were to start
Thank you Thomas for this and a 2015 filled with less spam for all of us
and our users. Here's to a healthy and happy new year, and maybe one with
even less spam!
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 7:22 AM, Thomas Eckardt
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> fixed in assp 2.4.6 build 15365:
>
anyone have any thoughts on this?
thanks
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 9:04 AM, K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On a windows box. I see the error "An existing connection was forcibly
> closed by the remote host" on occasion in the log, seemingly with spam
> a
On a windows box. I see the error "An existing connection was forcibly
closed by the remote host" on occasion in the log, seemingly with spam
addresses. Now I'm seeing it with some email from Capital One (a US
bank). See below
Dec-04-15 08:52:28 msg17822-13065 216.33.63.62 <
ecks!
> These options can be used to prevent system overloads in case of a
> spam-attack over a short time. They should be disabled as soon as
> possible, followed by a cache cleaning for this option.
>
>
>
> Von:K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com>
> An: ASSP developme
I feel like this has to have been discussed before, but I can't find any
reference to it.
Is there a way to skip DNSBL checking based on the envelope from / from
line? I want the message to contribute to the corpus, just not be scored
based on DNSBL.
To close this thread and for the sake of those who might see it later.
15261 was released which addresses a bug that incorrectly set dns server
values if NONE responded. (this points to a problem with my dns servers
which have yet to be determined)
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 9:59 AM, K Post
"0" instead of the 2
> servers that are being used.
>
> If this is the case - assp has not got any answer from any DNS-server.
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
>
>
> Von:K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com>
> An: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@lists.sour
Thanks Greyhat. They're windows DNS servers (I know, I know. No choice).
This is getting outside of the scope of ASSP now for SURE. I think I have
narrowed down the problem, and it IS something with our DNS resolution.
DNS seems really fast except when doing a PTR lookup for an IP that has
Following up / correcting my RWL check failed thread from earlier in the
week. Here's what I'm seeing:
With version 15255 if I have 3 dns servers entered into DNSServers (all
local servers without forwarders) but have 2 for DNSServerLimit after
several hours, the server starts having DNS issues
DNSReuseSocket being unticked didn't help. Another 4 hours after
restarting and the RWL/RBL errors are back.
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 5:18 PM, K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Seems like if I let ASSP 15255 run long enough, the RWL/RBL errors also
> come back. This was nev
Also in the logs:
can't get DNS-server answer for MX - (NO_NAME_SERVER_GIVEN)
But I see no messages about unresponsive DNS servers, the periodic tests of
the 3 show 0-3ms responses for sourceforge.net
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 9:04 AM, K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
> DNSReuseSoc
Thanks Greyhat for chiming in and sorry for so many emails all!
I'm using our 3 internal DNS servers. The ports are wide open between the
servers. There isn't a firewall issue. Nothing's changed on the DNS
servers or the firewall (I run them too).
Notes (to summarize my many posts - sorry
More information:
In the gui, under infostats, I see
used DNS Servers: 0 *<--- ZERO!?! *
defined DNS Servers: x.x.x.51 x.x.x.52 x.x.x.53 (there's my 3)
DNS Servers query time: min: 0.000 , avg: 0.062 , max: 3.014 (good response
times)
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 9:22 AM, K Post <nntp.p...@gma
ble conditions
>
> >How would ASSP know how to decrypt an included file?
>
> simple answer: because assp has encypted the file - it knows how to
> decrypt the file.
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
> Von:K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com>
> An: ASSP development mailing
servers have always been operating the
same but now ASSP is more picky? Or could something have changed where DNS
is queried differently? I've got DNStimeout set to 3 seconds. I've never
seen my dns servers take that long! I also have DNSReuseSocket checked.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 5:52 PM, K Post
Got this error again when opening the web interface but closing it
immediately (I went to the wrong site by mistake)
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 10:36 AM, K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I was searching my logs using the GUI, and mistakenly put the last 100
> files instead of
, Sep 15, 2015 at 1:47 PM, K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Got this error again when opening the web interface but closing it
> immediately (I went to the wrong site by mistake)
>
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 10:36 AM, K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I wa
a
problem with previous versions.
Any other ideas?
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 1:01 PM, K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've restarted several more times. I haven't changed any settings, but
> the RWL/RBL errors seem to have gone away. Bad cache or something? I am
> getting occa
Curious about this one. .35 is our SMTP server. If unkn...@ourcharity.org
isn't in LocalAddresses_Flat (which is what we use), shoudln't it be ASSP
that's rejecting the user, not the real SMTP server? (have I lost my mind?)
Sep-15-15 17:15:58 msg52358-04911 61.xx.xx.xx
updates. If the cron job changes the include file, assp will reload all
> groups.
>
> I found an issue for encrypted include-files. With the current release,
> one restart after making this changes may be required. An updated dev
> version will be released today.
>
>
gt; In any case - assp has absolutely no control to an externaly started
> program.
> See it the same way like clamd and freshclam are working together.
> freshclam is running totaly independend, it only tells the clamd that it
> has done something. clamd than reloads the pattern database
le one - nice, you'll get one report line with the count of all
> honeypot attempts
> do not log the final log line, which has [spam found] and the honeypot
> domain in it
> use 'BlockReport/modify.pm' to remove unwanted content fron the report
> (could be very complex)
>
or no DNS-server is
> available.
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
>
>
> Von:K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com>
> An: ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Datum: 14.09.2015 17:12
> Betreff:[Assp-test] error: RWL check failed :
I'm suddenly getting a lot of these lines:
error: RWL check failed : send: Bad file descriptor
Tried restarting ASSP, also tried restarting the machine.
Goes away for a bit, but comes back after a short while.
--
nevermind, figured it out. The group wants *@ourcharity.org I was missing
the asterisk.
Works well.
Thanks
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:21 PM, K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks. I think I'll go the way of a group.
>
> The gui says:
>
> It is possible to de
fine for a
while, and then start throwing these errors? Is there some kind of cache
that could be getting full or corrupted?
thanks
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:23 AM, K Post <nntp.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I need to dig deeper. There are 3 fast local dns servers that seem to be
>
What do you mean by "encrypted?" How would ASSP know how to decrypt an
included file?
I did notice an oddity when I changed my group definition file from
executing a perl script to having that perl script run externally and then
using an include instead. If those include files were in the cfg
One of the unfortunate parts of my job is analyzing the block report on a
nightly basis. Yes, you should feel sorry for me.
I recently implemented some honeypots, which are working great along with
your new method of having the database rebuild immediately with them.
GREAT STUFF.
I've got a
I wrote a scrpt to populate ASSP config files with IP address ranges based
on SPF values. For example, I call my GetDomainIPSfromSPF.pl script to get
all of the IP's that ConstantContact.com says they can send from. It works
well.
HOWEVER, on rare occasion, maybe once every 2-3 weeks,
I was searching my logs using the GUI, and mistakenly put the last 100
files instead of the last 10 and had 1000 matches lists. The search went
on and on, until I realized my mistake. I closed Chrome and reopened since
there doesn't seem to be a way to cancel the search.
I got a notification in
Can't wait to carve out some time to play with $reportBadDetectedSpam.
THANKS!!
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Thomas Eckardt thomas.ecka...@thockar.com
wrote:
Hi all,
fixed in assp 2.4.6 build 15232:
- IP addresses from 'Received:' headerlines were not detected, if the
connecting port
users)
The problem is that the volume of spam is causing the sender Ip to goto
the
extremePB.
you should disable this - it is in montor mode (early is disabled) on my
prod system
Thomas
Von:K Post nntp.p...@gmail.com
An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test
I sent this in early June to the user list, but it got no play, so I
figured that I'd give here a go.
Thanks
-- Forwarded message --
From: K Post nntp.p...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 9:34 AM
Subject: Honeypot addresses, any way to bypass extremepb?
To: For Users of ASSP
Outstanding. thanks Doug.
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Doug Lytle supp...@drdos.info wrote:
On Jul 22, 2015, at 1:00 PM, K Post nntp.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Would it be possible to have Log RE email the full line in the log
which
I just turned this on the other day. Edit the /assp/lib
I've got a LogRE set for
warning: SMTP authentication failed
That way I get an email when SMTP auth fails. The Log itself shows the
offender's IP address, but not the attempted username.
The email notification shows neither the IP address or the username.
Would it be possible to have Log RE
I've seen this a couple of times. Any reason for concern?
WARNING: runlevel 'complete mail' - priority 6 is already occupied by
plugin ASSP_AFC
--
Don't Limit Your Business. Reach for the Cloud.
GigeNET's Cloud
.
Reset the priority values of all used runlevel 2 Plugins to there default.
Thomas
Von:K Post nntp.p...@gmail.com
An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: 04.06.2015 19:42
Betreff:[Assp-test] Priority 1 already occupied by plugin ASSP_AFC
at 2:12 AM, Thomas Eckardt thomas.ecka...@thockar.com
wrote:
I'm testing DNSServerLimit is set to ONE.
Set this value at least to TWO.
Thomas
Von:K Post nntp.p...@gmail.com
An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: 14.06.2015 16:11
Betreff
/linked 'static' against the openssl version 1.0.2a
and does not require an openssl installation.
Thomas
Von:K Post nntp.p...@gmail.com
An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: 14.06.2015 15:57
Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] OpenSSL update
is already occupied by
plugin ASSP_AFC
at least two plugins must be registered to assp!
Notice: assp will try load any file in the 'assp/Plugins' folder, that
name starts with 'ASSP_' and has the extension .pm, as a Plugin.
Thomas
Von:K Post nntp.p...@gmail.com
An: ASSP development
I also see ssleay32.dll with a April 2015 date in your assp.mod disty.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 10:14 AM, K Post nntp.p...@gmail.com wrote:
ssleay32.dll (note the 32) is generally included with windows OpenSSL
distros.
I misunderstood what you were saying about the .dll in the distro
We've got 3 local (relatively fast, very stable) windows dns servers.
In an effort to reduce network traffic internally and externally by
limiting DNS queries where reasonable, I'm testing DNSServerLimit is set to
ONE. I feel like this will generally be sufficient, if for some reason a
DNS
with your (for example) OpenSSL source
and header files,
Thomas
Von:K Post nntp.p...@gmail.com
An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: 12.06.2015 22:48
Betreff:[Assp-test] OpenSSL update?
Thomas-
Back at the end of February you
Thomas-
Back at the end of February you published a complete X86 Perl 5.20
installation. It's working wonderfully, but since then there's been a
bunch of OpenSSL updates, the most recent being published yesterday to
1.0.2b.
PPM shows that I have version 1.68 of Net-SSLeay installed in SITE (for
I'm seeing this every once in a while. Any reason for concern?
WARNING: runlevel 'complete mail' - priority 1 is already occupied by
plugin ASSP_AFC
--
___
Assp-test mailing
Things seem to be are working fine, but I started to wonder if there's any
logic in having mail that is sent to no processing local addresses by
whitelisted senders ever add to the whitelist.
For example, I came across a scenario where a local no process address (one
that external volunteers use
is.
Could it be my version of the Outlook perl module?
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Thomas Eckardt thomas.ecka...@thockar.com
wrote:
I can't reproduce this.
Thomas
Von:K Post nntp.p...@gmail.com
An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: 29.05.2015
query will NOT return comments - so a script should also not
return such garbage.
Following the description, a comment can never be a part of a group!
Thomas
Von:K Post nntp.p...@gmail.com
An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: 29.05.2015 16:54
report' :
'NOT-SPAM report';
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 1:41 AM, Thomas Eckardt thomas.ecka...@thockar.com
wrote:
Is that addressed at all in this new version?
Yes.
Thomas
Von:K Post nntp.p...@gmail.com
An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum
The group definition gui says:
Lines starting with a # OR ; are consider a comment. Empty lines will be
ignored. A group definition stops, if a new group definition starts or at
the end of the file. Comments are not allowed inside a definition line.
I've got a little script (posted here) that
Tried 15148.
Changed UseLocalDNS to unchecked.
Entered 3 my local DNS servers separated by |
upon applying, I see in green that my 3 dns servers are used. Looks fine.
However, when I change DNSServerLimit to 1 I get a javascript possibly
invalid popup and this under DNSServerLimit
***
Also, in the log, I get:
error: there is NO DNS-server specified - at least TWO DNS-servers are
required!
ERROR: no answering DNS-SERVER found
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:27 AM, K Post nntp.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Tried 15148.
Changed UseLocalDNS to unchecked.
Entered 3 my local
fixed in assp 2.4.6 build 15148:
- analyzing outlook *.msg attached mails faíled
I do now see the name of the reporter, but missing is:
1) whether it is a spam or not-spam report
2) The subject
3) The ip information
4) any useful bayesian info
It's as if the bayesian and hmm analysis part is
Terrific! Thanks again for listening!! Love how responsive you are
I assume you saw my message about the DoSPF errors I was seeing when
implementing the new feature that limits the number of DNS servers in use?
Is that addressed at all in this new version?
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 4:29 PM,
After installing 15147 yesterday, everything seemed fine.
I unchecked UseLocalDNS
I put in our 3 local dns servers separated by | into DNSServers
DNSReuseSocket is checked
DNSServerLimit was first set to 2, then down to just 1
All seemed fine. Then I went to bed - after around 6 hours of
at 5:52 AM, Thomas Eckardt thomas.ecka...@thockar.com
wrote:
Ken, have you installed the Perl module 'Email::Outlook::Message' ?
Thomas
Von:K Post nntp.p...@gmail.com
An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: 27.05.2015 22:44
Betreff:[Assp
In the GUI, under the whiteSenderBase section, there appears to be a button
that says
edit White-Org-List
I'm guessing this was something done during debugging, but was meant to be
removed. It brings up the internal cache, which I wouldn't think most
people want to regularly be editing.
If
The button is there for over 5 years now!?
WOW - I must be getting old. With as much looking as I do at the GUI, I'd
think that I would have seen that button there! I figured that people who
want to edit caches would use the left menu. If it's getting use, leave
it! I guess I just never
I set PTRCacheInterval to 0 a couple weeks back during testing, and never
re-enabled it. I will, but I noticed a minor issue.
When looking at a message with no PTR for the sending IP, the Analyze GUI
seems to show:
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx is in PTRCache: status=
There's nothing after the equal
GREAT STUFF. Can't wait to try it out. And we got a change from 2.4.4 to
2.4.6!! (because of the dns and plotting differences?)
Thank you
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Thomas Eckardt thomas.ecka...@thockar.com
wrote:
Hi all,
fixed in assp 2.4.6 build 15147:
released, changed and
I believe you've misunderstood what I am asking. Surely with the way you
describe it, I've asked a stupid question, but that's not the case. Please
give me a chance to clarify:
Invalid senders, ie: doesnotex...@ourcharity.org will always be blocked,
not scored (to do otherwise is crazy as you
Thanks for fixing the analyze reports being sent to the admin after a user
sends in a spam/not-spam report. They're finally readable which really
helps.
Problem- the analyze reports that are emailed don't seem to to have any
useful info.
I do see who the report is from, but below that it has
interested in feedback. Feel free to use it however
you see fit. Hope this helps someone.
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 11:58 AM, K Post nntp.p...@gmail.com wrote:
So a helo matching say *.aol.com would also also stop a helo from from
getting a bonus because it matches a known good helo? If so, GREAT
)
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Robert K Coffman Jr. -Info From Data Corp.
bcoff...@infofromdata.com wrote:
On 5/26/2015 12:45 PM, K Post wrote:
Thanks Bob. I use a ported grep on Windows. I could also just search
the
Sorry, misunderstood your issue. I thought all your responses from SPAM
to search, I could see reports in real time
and correct if necessary.
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Robert K Coffman Jr. -Info From Data
Corp. bcoff...@infofromdata.com wrote:
On 5/26/2015 11:34 AM, K Post wrote:
For the time
being I need to be able to monitor these as our users learn what
what should and
should not be reported.
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:31 PM, K Post nntp.p...@gmail.com wrote:
When users send in spam or not-spam reports, they get a nicely formatted
thanks for the report email. It has the subject of the reported email in
the subject name. Perfect!
I now have
worker, that detects a DNS problem, will force the
recheck and reordering of the all defined nameserver.
Per default, assp checks all defined nameservers once in a minute.
Thomas
Von:K Post nntp.p...@gmail.com
An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum
' = 'password2',
..,
..
};
the admins will need to write there password anywhere in a BlockReport
request mail at the start of any body line.
Keep the email addresses in lower case ! Passwords are case sensitive and
should not look like emailaddresses..
Thomas
Von:K Post nntp.p
seconds - I
think the numbers are selfexplaining.
Thomas
Von:K Post nntp.p...@gmail.com
An: ASSP development mailing list assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Datum: 21.05.2015 06:05
Betreff:Re: [Assp-test] More MX and A record lookup issues
I ask if it's normal because I
I can read it.
Sorry, I have no idea what you mean.
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 3:51 AM, Thomas Eckardt thomas.ecka...@thockar.com
wrote:
Does BlockReportAdmins honor rules in EmailDomainAdmins? If so, it might
be good to indicate that in the GUI.
I can read it.
Thomas
Von:K Post
I see no point in causing extra traffic if isn't not necessary, but this is
NOT a point that's important enough to argue about. I'm done.
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Robert K Coffman Jr. -Info From Data Corp.
bcoff...@infofromdata.com wrote:
On 5/21/2015 3:27 PM, K Post wrote:
network
601 - 700 of 1446 matches
Mail list logo