Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:05:45 -0500
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] Feature suggestion. Message scoring warning range
Re
It doesn't seem to be checking the spamloverre then. I've tested several
different times and can&#
ountymd.gov
301-600-2399/x12399
> From: Fritz Borgstedt
> Reply-To: ASSP development mailing list
> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 22:50:09 +0100
> To: ASSP development mailing list
> Cc: ASSP development mailing list
> Subject: Re: [Assp-test] Feature suggestion. Message s
ASSP development mailing list
schreibt:
>All correct except I didn't request if it were to a spam lover. I
>want it
>passed if it is spam, and it matches that phrase.. Regardless if they
>are in
>spamlovers or not. I don't want all spam to go to everyone.. Aka I
>don't
>want everyone to be spaml
I¹d like to see a regex option for key words that perhaps you always want to
fall in the warning range and not be scored otherwise(for those of us with a
primarily scoring setup). Obviously only if they are not whitelisted.
There are select words that I know always have a decent (50/50)~ (60/40)
p
