If Okmail stays in OK mail for X time with out being submitted to
³assp-spam², then it will be whitelisted.
Paul K. Dickson
Systems Administrator
Interagency Information Technologies
Frederick County Government
Frederick, MD 21701
pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov
301-600-2399/x12399
I like the new(at least to me), suspiciousVirus regex option to allow some
leniency for those third-party databases which may not always be accurate.
However I think it could be expanded to utilize the whitelist. A checkbox
that made anything matching that regex, that was also from someone on the
For Users of ASSP assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
I like the new(at least to me), suspiciousVirus regex option to allow
some
leniency for those third-party databases which may not always be
accurate.
However I think it could be expanded to utilize the whitelist. A
checkbox
that made
of ASSP assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:55:10 +0100
To: For Users of ASSP assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Feature suggestion.
For Users of ASSP assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
I like the new(at least to me), suspiciousVirus regex
A threshold of X number of messages passed from a sender in test mode
that would send a configurable message to the sender saying you sent us
X number of messages thought to be spam. You may want to see if you
have a virus that is sending these.
Maybe an option to then remove that
Maybe an option to then remove that person from the whitelist. Also,
an option to attach the messages in question to the mail so they can be
reviewed as needed. That would be helpful for them, so when they see
they sent a message Enlarge your member!, they know there is something
wrong on
Just a thought.
Bad one.
-
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
Because it is not always possible to whitelist everything. We have new
customers every day; we don't know in advance their email addresses
until they purchase from website. Same with PR - they don't know who
will contact them tomorrow. I made them spamlovers so they don't
miss
opportunities.
Why wouldn't users just whitelist the addresses in question?
Vadim Shalenkov wrote:
Feature suggestion
It is related to WhiteRe and to be placed into Whitelisting section of
GUI.
Depends on their work function recipients may receive emails with
different content.
To help reduce false
Feature suggestion
It is related to WhiteRe and to be placed into Whitelisting section of
GUI.
Depends on their work function recipients may receive emails with
different content.
To help reduce false positives I would create a list of recipients with
matching list of Ham keywords. For example:
David Norelid wrote:
Why wouldn't users just whitelist the addresses in question?
Because it is not always possible to whitelist everything. We have new
customers every day; we don't know in advance their email addresses
until they purchase from website. Same with PR - they don't know who
will
Vadim Shalenkov wrote:
David Norelid wrote:
Why wouldn't users just whitelist the addresses in question?
Because it is not always possible to whitelist everything. We have new
customers every day; we don't know in advance their email addresses
until they purchase from website. Same
/spam/dnsbl (for RBL-Failed Messages)
/spam/Collect (for Trapped Messages)
/spam/Bomb (for RegEx-ed Messages)
/spam/helo (for HeloBL and Invalid Helo)
Etc.
why should we do that?
report trapped (collected) Spam wich is not DNSBL-failed, but
blocked/stored by other reasons.
???
So I
Amazing argument..,
:-))
whatever put the spamcop address into the ccspam address and
select via collection mode what type of spam should be send
to spamcop, you can even use your spamcollection addresses as
a filter for ccspam.
So I did ... and failed
So i went into the SC-newsgroup
Have the SMTP limits obey the whitelist.
Why:
Well, we have a large organization we exchange large amounts of mail
with. For whatever reason, their Symantec Mail Security Gateway POS
trips the max errors and ends up blocking their mail for the expiration
period. This ended up in an endless loop
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
Have the SMTP limits obey the whitelist.
what smtp limits do you mean?
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Having it obey the ipwl is obviously strait forward. I was thinking
to
make things even better, it could check to see if the ip matches the
domain name listed in the whitedomains file, and if so, add that IP to
the list of a smtpwhiteip's file.
This is already done, whitedomains will put IPs
A better definition of what is stored in /spam or different folders
based on the reason would be nice.
I report my trapped Spam to SpamCop.net, and it is a bit boring to
report known Ips (and a lot of senseless work too).
I would like to report trapped (collected) Spam wich is not
DNSBL-failed,
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
A better definition of what is stored in /spam or different folders
based on the reason would be nice.
???
I report my trapped Spam to SpamCop.net, and it is a bit boring to
report known Ips
An: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Betreff: Re: [Assp-user] Feature suggestion
Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
A better definition of what is stored in /spam or different folders
based
went ahead and set the prior to 0 for the time being.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fritz
Borgstedt
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 11:21 AM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Feature
for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy'
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Feature suggestion
A better definition of what is stored in /spam or different folders
based on the reason would be nice.
???
In example:
/spam/dnsbl (for RBL-Failed Messages)
/spam/Collect (for Trapped Messages)
/spam/Bomb
In example:
/spam/dnsbl (for RBL-Failed Messages)
/spam/Collect (for Trapped Messages)
/spam/Bomb (for RegEx-ed Messages)
/spam/helo (for HeloBL and Invalid Helo)
Etc.
Use the tool which is already available.
Use ccspam with spamtag and put the mails in folders according to the
spamtag.
Use the tool which is already available.
Use ccspam with spamtag and put the mails in folders
according to the spamtag.
OK - that work for ccspam, but is there a chance to do it File-based in
the ASSP-Folders too.
Like with the Subject in the filenames also (or or) with the spamtag?
I
I forward the Files from the Servers ASSP/spam Folder to Spamcop, not
from my Mailclient.
The change your mode of operation.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find
Christian Rehkopf wrote:
Use the tool which is already available.
Use ccspam with spamtag and put the mails in folders
according to the spamtag.
OK - that work for ccspam, but is there a chance to do it File-based in
the ASSP-Folders too.
Like with the Subject in the filenames also (or
Christian Rehkopf wrote:
Use the tool which is already available.
Use ccspam with spamtag and put the mails in folders
according to the spamtag.
OK - that work for ccspam, but is there a chance to do it File-based in
the ASSP-Folders too.
Like with the Subject in the filenames also
Dickson, Paul, on 8/8/2007 11:34 AM, said the following:
Keep track of all submissions to the email interfaces for falsely
tagged/nottagged mail.. compare that to the total # of messages
processed to get an accuracy percentage.
I did it manually for the last 8 days. 99.95% accuracy! JJ
I
Keep track of all submissions to the email interfaces for falsely
tagged/nottagged mail.. compare that to the total # of messages
processed to get an accuracy percentage.
I did it manually for the last 8 days. 99.95% accuracy! JJ
Obviously the autowhitelisting to recipients is wonderful. What if
there were an option to have any sent mail, with the subject tag that
you use to specify, thought to be spam was added to the notspam corpus?
It might save users the trouble of having to send to whitelist. Might
be overly
SMTP Proxy
Subject: [Assp-user] Feature suggestion.
Obviously the autowhitelisting to recipients is wonderful. What if
there were an option to have any sent mail, with the subject tag that
you use to specify, thought to be spam was added to the notspam corpus?
It might save users the trouble
1) I believe what you're talking about is the WhiteRe, which will cause
ASSP to consider a message whitelisted. It's in the Whitelisting section
of the UI, but it has one caveat: WhiteRe is checked after all sender
related checks, so the message might fail on PTR, RBL, etc before it
gets to
: Friday, June 15, 2007 11:19 AM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] Feature suggestion.
1) I believe what you're talking about is the WhiteRe, which will cause
ASSP to consider a message whitelisted. It's in the Whitelisting section
of the UI
1) I believe what you're talking about is the WhiteRe, which will
cause
ASSP to consider a message whitelisted. It's in the Whitelisting
section
of the UI, but it has one caveat: WhiteRe is checked after all sender
related checks, so the message might fail on PTR, RBL, etc before it
gets to
Then the UI description should be updated to reflect this?
ATTENTION: The body is scanned in a later stage AFTER all sender related
checks are performed. So a white expression here might not prevent the
message to be blocked by eg. invalid PTR. Set the sender related checks
to message-score
Then the UI description should be updated to reflect this?
ATTENTION: The body is scanned in a later stage AFTER all sender
related
checks are performed. So a white expression here might not prevent
the
message to be blocked by eg. invalid PTR. Set the sender related
checks
to message-score
Hello
please may you consider to add the possibility to pipe all ASSP spam to a file ?
something like
sendAllSpamPipe
where I could enter (i.e)
mypersonalspamdb.pl
Thanks
Ethan
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2
Hello
please may you consider
Please do it yourself, if you need it.
fritz
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No
no problem :))) .
ethan
p.s. by the way ..don't you think it could be usueful for assp users
to pipe also to programs not only email ? Why not ?
On 5/11/07, Fritz Borgstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
please may you consider
Please do it yourself, if you need it.
fritz
why not too ?
On 5/11/07, Fritz Borgstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
p.s. by the way ..don't you think it could be usueful for assp users
to pipe also to programs not only email ? Why not ?
There is an other question: if somebody is willing to write the
receiving side of a pipe, why is he not
p.s. by the way ..don't you think it could be usueful for assp users
to pipe also to programs not only email ? Why not ?
There is an other question: if somebody is willing to write the
receiving side of a pipe, why is he not willing to write the sending
one?
Ethan Albone wrote:
no problem :))) .
ethan
p.s. by the way ..don't you think it could be usueful for assp users
to pipe also to programs not only email ? Why not ?
Because it would be duplicating what is already very readily achieved by
using filters/forwards on the MTA side of the
42 matches
Mail list logo
