e is some priority of that X+1 caller,
> you drop one of the existing channels instead and allow the X+1 caller to
> continue.
>
> My intention of asking this is to learn and evaluate a new technique: not
> to criticize. Thanks in advance!
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 5:17 PM Phil
Jean,
You should know that I wrote something very similar to what you are asking
for. Slightly different reasons and I use ARI which makes it very easy.
However, the result is the same. The inbound call gets terminated.
For those of you who don't know why you'd do this here's the situation:
I think that's a wonderful idea! I use ARI only.
Thanks!
Phil Mickelson
CBA Software, Inc.
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 6:43 PM, Kevin Harwell <kharw...@digium.com> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> (I believe this topic has been brought up before, but I was unable to
> locate the thread)
Re asterisk-ari list. I don't believe there is one but it sure would be
great if there was!
Thanks
Phil Mickelson
CBA Software
On Jan 16, 2017 3:31 PM, "Matt Fredrickson" <cres...@digium.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 8:00 PM, bala murugan <fightwit...@gmail.com&g
leaving
it up to the people you want to give it a try? As we're all aware Asterisk
is a very complex and interwoven system. Make a small change and you can
easily screw up three other things.
Please keep this in mind when you're so flippant about what the effort is
going to be.
Regards,
Phil
Thank you for your response.
Phil Mickelson
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Joshua Colp jc...@digium.com wrote:
Phil Mickelson wrote:
Hello,
I've written a full answering service application with Asterisk at the
center. All of my interaction with Asterisk is through ARI. Thank you
so
if this works.
Thank you again.
Phil Mickelson
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Matthew Jordan mjor...@digium.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Phil Mickelson p...@cbasoftware.com
wrote:
Thank you for your response.
Phil Mickelson
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Joshua Colp jc
know how much it
would cost?
Thank you for your time! And, thank you again for ARI!!!
Regards,
Phil Mickelson
CBA Software, Inc.
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing
for communicating with the
client. Why? Because I had already started down that road and didn't want
to change. I use rooms in socket.io.
Phil Mickelson
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Vipul Rastogi vipul.rast...@temasys.com.sg
wrote:
Anybody tried asterisk connecting to Socket.io server
I agree with Paul 100%. Given my experience with ARI over the last year
and how easy it is to create these apps I would think you could avoid the
dialplan completely and easily create a routine to do exactly what you want.
1. You would know when the call started and was connected.
2. You can
richer in comparison to its
predecessor AMI, which people still have a hard time figuring
out why they should move to ARI.
This kind of feature can be a tipping point.
My 2c on the matter.
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:04 PM, Phil Mickelson p...@cbasoftware.com
wrote:
I agree with Paul 100
don't, we'll become irrelevant.
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Phil Mickelson p...@cbasoftware.com
wrote:
Nir, I agree with you about wondering why does the call go through the
dialplan. Perhaps someone could answer that? Or, perhaps give us some
idea if this will change?
In my case
as quickly as possible.
Phil Mickelson
CBA Software, LLC
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Paul Albrecht palbre...@glccom.com
wrote:
Not asking for unqualified promises about the future of Asterisk. Simply
asking for an acknowledgment of the obvious, that is, Asterisk without the
dial plan wouldn’t
guarantee you that you let a
bunch of programmers loose on this and you'll get a bunch of alternatives.
I believe, this is exactly what the Asterisk developers were hoping for.
At least, I hope it is!
Hope that answers your question.
Phil Mickelson
CBA Software, LLC
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 5:47 PM
Matt,
Thank you very much for taking the time to respond!
Phil Mickelson
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 4:28 AM, Matthew Jordan mjor...@digium.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Phil Mickelson p...@cbasoftware.com
wrote:
Two questions:
1. There is a BridgeDestroy event
is it Newchannel and not ChannelCreate?
Thank you!
Phil Mickelson
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com
ast_channel_exit_bridge?
Phil Mickelson
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Matt Jordan reviewbo...@asterisk.org
wrote:
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3585/
On June 5th, 2014, 12:45 p.m. CDT, *Mark Michelson* wrote
17 matches
Mail list logo
