On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 10:03:56AM -0500, Leif Madsen wrote:
> Absolutely! You would do that with an ENV (environment variable) setting in
> the Dockerfile. Once that was setup, you can override that at build time
> (basically you set a "default" value, and then you can override it from the
>
Absolutely! You would do that with an ENV (environment variable) setting in
the Dockerfile. Once that was setup, you can override that at build time
(basically you set a "default" value, and then you can override it from the
docker build command when you're building the container image).
So phase
I make use of a couple patches so the latest Fedora spec is a good enough
base for me. If other people want to see current binaries for EPEL
hopefully they'll speak up. I had a chance to look over the asterisk.spec
from Fedora master, I have a couple comments.
* res_ari_mailboxes.so should be
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Leif Madsen wrote:
> The way it works is that major versions of Asterisk (and same with other
> packages) are associated with specific releases of Fedora and RHEL, which
> means the major versions are "stuck" to those releases.
If it's
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Matthew Jordan wrote:
> Would it be appropriate to summarize the current state of things as "we
> need a spec file for Asterisk"?
At one point, there was an awful .spec file in the Asterisk sources...
hopefully it's not around any more.
Jared,
I just looked through the EPEL website at EPEL6 and EPEL7, only found
Asterisk 1.8. Can you point me to the spec file you are using or an
SRPM?
Thanks,
Corey
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Jared Smith wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Matthew
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Matthew Jordan wrote:
>
>
>
>
>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Steve Edwards > > wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Steve Edwards <
asterisk@sedwards.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 16
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Steve Edwards
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Steve Edwards
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, 16 Nov 2015, Leif Madsen wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> I wrote up a lengthy blog post that likely borders on
Hey Corey!
The way it works is that major versions of Asterisk (and same with other
packages) are associated with specific releases of Fedora and RHEL, which
means the major versions are "stuck" to those releases.
However, you can still build the newer version of Asterisk by pulling the
spec
Hey Leif,
The Respoke team here at Digium has been doing quite a bit of work with
Docker lately, and we have shared a few Dockerfiles up on Docker Hub[1] as
well.
The goal for our work seems to have a different target than yours, though.
While you are working to make building packages suitable
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Steve Edwards
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 16 Nov 2015, Leif Madsen wrote:
>
>> I wrote up a lengthy blog post that likely borders on ranting:
>>
>>
http://blog.leifmadsen.com/blog/2015/11/10/asterisk-docker-container-phase-1/
>
>
> I've only read
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015, Leif Madsen wrote:
I wrote up a lengthy blog post that likely borders on ranting:
http://blog.leifmadsen.com/blog/2015/11/10/asterisk-docker-container-phase-1/
I've only read the first x paragraphs (I'll read more later), and I hope
I'm not flying off the handle.
I
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Steve Edwards
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 16 Nov 2015, Leif Madsen wrote:
>
>> I wrote up a lengthy blog post that likely borders on ranting:
>>
>> http://blog.leifmadsen.com/blog/2015/11/10/asterisk-docker-container-phase-1/
>
>
> I've only
13 matches
Mail list logo