On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 2:19 AM Dennis Buteyn
wrote:
> On 4/4/23 21:53, George Joseph wrote:
>
> Every open source project, CI/CD system and SCM system has its own
> quirks. Asterisk and GitHub are no exception. :)Here's some
> background, most of which is just informational for you but
On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 3:03 PM Joshua C. Colp wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 5:27 PM George Joseph wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 1:16 PM wrote:
>>
>>> On 4/4/2023 2:53 PM, George Joseph wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Speaking of workflows... If you want to see the workflows and
>>> >
On 4/4/23 21:53, George Joseph wrote:
Every open source project, CI/CD system and SCM system has its own
quirks. Asterisk and GitHub are no exception. :) Here's some
background, most of which is just informational for you but caused us
some head scratching and will probably continue to do so.
On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 5:27 PM George Joseph wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 1:16 PM wrote:
>
>> On 4/4/2023 2:53 PM, George Joseph wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > Speaking of workflows... If you want to see the workflows and
>> > actions we've written so far, check out the
On 4/4/2023 4:26 PM, George Joseph wrote:
On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 1:16 PM wrote:
On 4/4/2023 2:53 PM, George Joseph wrote:
* Is there any connection with reviews/PRs in progress? Suppose an
issue is open and maybe on the verge of being stale, but someone has
submitted a PR
On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 1:16 PM wrote:
> On 4/4/2023 2:53 PM, George Joseph wrote:
> >
> >
> > Speaking of workflows... If you want to see the workflows and
> > actions we've written so far, check out the asterisk/asterisk-gh-test
> (the
> > .github/workflows directory) and
On 4/4/2023 2:53 PM, George Joseph wrote:
Speaking of workflows... If you want to see the workflows and
actions we've written so far, check out the asterisk/asterisk-gh-test (the
.github/workflows directory) and asterisk/asterisk-ci-actions repos. If
you're experienced with GitHub
