Hi List,
I have stupid question but I want to know it. Why we use the PRI insted of
BRI ? Just for the sake of number of lines or any thing else ?
And why SIP is used for making calls rather then IAX? Even we know IAX takes
1 channel for making calls?
-
Thanks and regards
Virendra Bhati
Sunday, May 29, 2011, 10:57:00 AM, virendra wrote:
I have stupid question but I want to know it. Why we use the PRI insted of
BRI ? Just for the sake of number of lines or any thing else ?
Yes, because of much more channels. But if you need only 2 or 4
channels BRI is cheaper. From 10-12
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 02:34:36PM +0300, Ashik Ali wrote:
Hi dears,
I am from saudi arabia and using asterisk 1.6.2.13,Dahdi-2.3.0 and
Digium, Inc. Wildcard AEX800 8-port analog card (PCI-Express) .
I am facing problem with detecting caller id before first ring.I
recorded the dahdi
On Sun, 29 May 2011, virendra bhati wrote:
Hi List,
I have stupid question but I want to know it. Why we use the PRI insted of
BRI ? Just for the sake of number of lines or any thing else ?
It probably depends on your country.
In mainland europe (or maybe just Germany), ISDN2e (BRI) is very
FreeCNAM.org is providing a free CNAM API for Open Source PBX users.
This API queries a private CNAM database, and returns standard
15-Character CNAM results. Any entry not already in the database will
be queued for investigation, and added to the database as soon as
information is located. This
BE WARY OF THIS ONE!
If you click the link it comes up with a simple block Text Message
US GOVERNMENT
I doubt the US Government has any thing to do with it but... something is
fishy here.
Cary
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
You are doing a CNAM lookup on that 202 number. Change the URL to a
number you know, and it will do a CNAM lookup on it. You can take your
tinfoil hat off now.
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of
Excuse me!
Doing that with http://freecnam.org/dip?q=9038874180
Comes up with WAL-MART which is correct, so I guess my mistrust was
paranoid. (But just because you are paranoid doesn't mean that someone
isn't trying to infiltrate your computer or steal your email address or what
ever!)
And
Thanks I had just sent off a mea culpa, and I have a gold plated tin foil
hat that I love and will continue to wear!
:-)
Cary
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Terry Brummell
Sent: Sunday, May
This is the main public Whitehouse switchboard number. I figured I
would use a prominent phone number for my sample dip.
On 05/29/2011 08:05 AM, Cary Fitch wrote:
BE WARY OF THIS ONE!
If you click the link it comes up with a simple block Text Message
US GOVERNMENT
I doubt the US Government
FreeCNAM.org is providing a free CNAM API for Open Source PBX users.
This API queries a private CNAM database, and returns standard
15-Character CNAM results. Any entry not already in the database will
be queued for investigation, and added to the database as soon as
information is located.
Try them all again. Remember that this is a static database that has to
'research' numbers it has not seen before.
By now (a few minutes later), the database should have been updated.
On 05/29/2011 08:56 AM, Richard Kenner wrote:
FreeCNAM.org is providing a free CNAM API for Open Source PBX
Try them all again. Remember that this is a static database that has to
'research' numbers it has not seen before.
Well, that doesn't make it very interesting: most calls I'd expect to
get won't have been seen by it before.
By now (a few minutes later), the database should have been
The system uses real Telco CNAM Dips. Any generic names you get are
from the subscriber's carrier itself. We can only provide what we
ourselves get.
I tried it, but it returns the same kind of junk that some of the databases
do. For example, on a Florida number, it just says FLORIDA instead
Works well - however, I see you included the API access.
Are there more parameters that we can pass to get more information?
Example, when we go to the web site, it gives you the
City/State/Province/Postcode and carrier.
G
On 5/29/2011 07:47, Michael R. Wally wrote:
FreeCNAM.org is
On 05/29/2011 09:37 AM, Michael R. Wally wrote:
So how long till its an adaptive telemarketing blocker based on the
query velocity of the numbers ?
The system uses real Telco CNAM Dips. Any generic names you get are
from the subscriber's carrier itself. We can only provide what we
Try them all again. Remember that this is a static database that has to
'research' numbers it has not seen before.
What happens when the CNAM is changed? How often does it go back and poll
the database?
--
_
-- Bandwidth
The system uses real Telco CNAM Dips. Any generic names you get are
from the subscriber's carrier itself. We can only provide what we
ourselves get.
There's more than one CNAM database (aren't there seven?). I would have
hoped that a service such as this would look at a bunch of them and
GRIN!
C.
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of jon pounder
Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2011 8:48 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Free CNAM
On 05/29/2011 09:37 AM,
The system uses real Telco CNAM Dips. Any generic names you get are
from the subscriber's carrier itself. We can only provide what we
ourselves get.
There's more than one CNAM database (aren't there seven?). I would have
hoped that a service such as this would look at a bunch of
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Cary Fitch ca...@usawide.net wrote:
The system uses real Telco CNAM Dips. Any generic names you get are
from the subscriber's carrier itself. We can only provide what we
ourselves get.
There's more than one CNAM database (aren't there seven?). I would
Ryan --
Appreciate your continuing assistance with this.
(No internet last 24 hours not helping...)
The tcpdump was, iiuc, for all traffic on the interface:
tcpdump -vv -i eth0
.
.
.
23:38:58.135264 IP (tos 0x10, ttl 64, id 1172, offset 0, flags [none], proto:
UDP (17), length: 49)
And f/w POS3-07-4-00
i
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
Hi,
Would just like to inquire why asterisk fails to send calls in / out
when the DNS is failing
or when the server with asterisk has no internet. Ip phones are
connected via IP address and i am using an FXO card, so even if
internet fails i should still be able to make calls thru the fxo. but
On 27/05/11 1:08 PM, Cobra 2 wrote:
I was trying really hard to not say RTFM.
Some people might not be aware that TFM exists :D
--
Cheers,
Matt Riddell
___
http://www.venturevoip.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News)
25 matches
Mail list logo
