RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk on MS Virtual Server

2005-03-11 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Turgut Abacioglu wrote: Hello I downloaded Astwind and get working the network (means can access to Internet through MS Windows). DEbian and Asterisk files are updated from Internet. But When I make install in Zaptel (it was my first make) I got many errors. Acoording

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Dual Asterisk Servers

2005-03-11 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Nik Martin wrote: Due to the unfortunate nature of Wikis, the section on voip-info.org that deals with dual asterisk servers is full of pretty bad and outdataed examples. What I'm trying to do is distribute small asterisk boxes to remote offices that have SIP clients

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Why echo occurs

2005-03-01 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005, Steve Underwood wrote: [ DELETED ] How do you control acoustic spill within a phone through the use of directional microphones? Adjusting gains mitigates the issue a bit, but is hardly a solution. These are just bodges, not solutions. And just to add my two cents to the

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Why echo occurs

2005-03-01 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005, Robert Hajime Lanning wrote: [ DELETED ] ok, I did miss that. Then again, the grandstream does have a speaker phone. I guess the problem is that I don't know of a SIP hardphone that doesn't have a speaker phone. Polycom IP300 has a Listen Only speakerphone. No

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: No ringback over IAX - LiveVoip

2005-02-05 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005, Brian Dingman wrote: I took them up on their offer for a refund. IMHO they shouldn't offer * service at all. Even outgoing calls aren't handled properly. Lots of making progress - no answer results. Others have suggested iax.cc. However, they haven't repsonded to my

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: No ringback over IAX - LiveVoip

2005-01-30 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: On January 29, 2005 11:29 pm, Brian Dingman wrote: This is driving me crazy. I have resorted to using the m option in the Dial command just so folks don't hang up. I can't believe nobody else is having this issue. Simple test: try it with

Re: [Asterisk-Users] where to buy x100p

2005-01-30 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, Remco Barende wrote: You'll be better off buying the TDM400 from Digium. I just ditched all my X100P clones because of huge problems with echoes. Even worse, the interrupt problems with the clone cards caused my box to crash under heavy I/O. Want to buy the X100P

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk on MS Virtual Server

2005-01-30 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, Paul Tyreman wrote: Hi, This might not be a very popular question, but I was just wondering if anyone have ever tried to run Asterisk on a Windows computer using Microsoft Virtual Server (http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserversystem/virtualserver/default.mspx).

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk on MS Virtual Server

2005-01-30 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, Paul Tyreman wrote: http://www.digium.com/index.php?menu=astwind I think this may be worth a look, I'm downloading it as I type this e-mail... I didn't know Asterisk had the possibility of being run on a windows machine and while it's not as stable as a Linux

[Asterisk-Users] TE405P w/ Intel SE7210TP1_E Motherboard

2005-01-29 Thread Greg Boehnlein
Hello, I'm looking at building a couple new PRI Gateway boxes using TE405P cards, and was wondering if anyone has had any experiences (good or bad) with the Intel SE7210TP1_E motherboards from Intel. General Technics builds some really nice (and cost effective) 1U servers based on the

[Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP 300/500 Conferencing Behavior

2005-01-20 Thread Greg Boehnlein
Hello, I've got a mixture of SPIP 300 and 500 phones in production for various clients. I've got the XML settings configured for local conferencing, but I'm not seeing the expected behavior from the phone when I attempt to conference two calls together. According to the manual, while

[Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP 500 Dial Issues

2005-01-12 Thread Greg Boehnlein
Hello, I have a mixture of Polycom SP IP 500 and 300 phones. I have been reading through the administration manual to try and solve this problem, but I do not seem to be able to find the answers to my question. I figured I would ask here and see if anyone has some suggestions. The

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP 500 Dial Issues

2005-01-12 Thread Greg Boehnlein
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Boehnlein Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 12:54 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP 500 Dial Issues Hello, I have a mixture of Polycom SP IP 500 and 300 phones. I have been reading

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP 500 Dial Issues

2005-01-12 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, Paul Rodan wrote: Yeah, it's a way for numbers to get sent faster, so you don't have to wait for the 3 second timeout before it gets transmitted to Asterisk. It's similar to the dial-plan in the Sipura devices. I don't know where it's mentioned in their documentation,

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP 500 Dial Issues

2005-01-12 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, Andrei (MPI) wrote: Greg Boehnlein wrote: Hello, I have a mixture of Polycom SP IP 500 and 300 phones. I have been reading through the administration manual to try and solve this problem, but I do not seem to be able to find the answers to my question. I figured

Re: [Asterisk-Users] RE: Polycom IP 500 Dial Issues

2005-01-12 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, Kai-Uwe Jensen wrote: On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, Paul Rodan wrote: Yeah, it's a way for numbers to get sent faster, so you don't have to wait for the 3 second timeout before it gets transmitted to Asterisk. It's similar to the dial-plan in the Sipura devices. I

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Ethernet Channel Bank idea

2004-12-15 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004, Matt Klein wrote: 3) good luck getting the firmware source is the firmware source freely available, -- I've been asked by others. All the other (excellent, thought provoking) conversation aside, Jake Messenger from Portmasters.com has been granted a license by Lucent

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Ethernet Channel Bank idea

2004-12-15 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004, Matt Klein wrote: W/ Portmaster to Ether Portmaster Qty 2 T1 $400 Portmaster Qty 2 T1 $400 Carrier Access Qty 4

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Ethernet Channel Bank idea

2004-12-15 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004, Matt Klein wrote: who said anything about a computer? :) computer, $$extra on both. may be less on the pm3 side due to resource needs. In the scenario I envision this being used in, there is no computer. The PM3 runs (On it's x86 w/ 4 or 16 megs of ram) a stripped

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Pitching Asterisk

2004-12-13 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Damon Estep wrote: http://www.millenigence.com/articles/asterisk-non-technical-review.pdf A word of warning.. That document is a good start, but you best not put it in front of a decision maker. There are a bunch of grammatical and typographical errors that need to be

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Ethernet Channel Bank (Comming Soon to a NOC Near You!)

2004-12-13 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Christopher Dobbs wrote: Had not thought of that. We are mostly interested in providing POTS lines inside of a company. Think of it as a a massive CPE device running on the VPN of a corporation with offices in many towns. who knows? We saw all of the traffic

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Very Cool.........Asterisk Made Wired Magazine

2004-12-12 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004, JR Richardson wrote: Hi Guys, The article They've Got Your number in the Dec 2004 issue of WIRED magazine mentions Asterisk PBX (on p.100). The article is about phone phreaks hijacking cell phones with Bluetooth technology along with spoofing CID to pull some

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Ethernet Channel Bank idea

2004-12-12 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004, nik martin wrote: news.gmane.org wrote: Allied Telesyn VoIP Access Device http://www.alliedtelesyn.co.uk/site/files/documents/datasheet/VP624FXS_euro.pdf This is a 24-port FXS 1u device, conveniently presented as a single RJ-21 TELCO connector. yeah,

Re: [Asterisk-Users] RE: Polycom 500 - Dialtone while connected

2004-12-12 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Thu, 9 Dec 2004, Jorge Mendoza wrote: Andrei, I'm interested too. Any chance to put the archive in a ftp site?. Jorge Mendoza I am also interested in getting the 1.3.4 firmware. It annoys me that I can't just get it from Polycom's website, and forces me to rethink deploying their

RE: [Asterisk-Users] :: Migrating to 1.0.3 = Attention. ::

2004-12-07 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Tue, 7 Dec 2004, Brian West wrote: If u used allow=G723.1 , now u have to use : allow=g723 * ( NO CAPS ) !!! allow=G729 , now u have to use : allow=g729 * ( NO CAPS ) !!! allow=iLBC , now u have to use : allow=ilbc * ( NO CAPS ) !!! Please , verify all configurations files (

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Sveasoft Alchemy QOS

2004-12-06 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, Kanuri, Seshu (Company IT) wrote: Tell me which one can get me access to the LinkSys Linux using SSH? Does Satori has this feature? I am not so concerned with Voice Shaping and QOS at this time, but more interested in converting this into a Linux box that is

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Ring all Configured Extension

2004-12-06 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, Eric Rees wrote: Where only talking about 100 extensions. That is a lot to hard code by hand. Just use app_queue and define a list of members as the SIP extensions. It is a lot easier to maintain the queues.conf file than to worry about adding 100 extensions into your

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sveasoft Alchemy QOS

2004-12-06 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004, Steve Kennedy wrote: Well, then roll your own and stop whining about it. Quite frankly calling it hackware shows that you have no concept of how much work has gone into the Sveasoft firmware, nor do you grasp the concept that Linksys is incorporating many of the

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Sveasoft Alchemy QOS

2004-12-06 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004, Kanuri, Seshu (Company IT) wrote: Greg Wrote /SNIP/ Everyone wins from this, and Sveasoft has a revenue stream that allows them to keep focused development on improving the firmware. I have over 60 of the WRT54GS units in production and I run Sveasoft firmware on every

Re: [Asterisk-Users] pre-installation jitters

2004-12-02 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, Samudra E. Haque wrote: I would like to build my newest server based upon Fedora Core 3, and load up asterisk. I was all set to do so.. but then I read in Asterisk Users Digest, Vol 4, Issue 404: I think you would be insane to run your production servers on Fedora Core

[Asterisk-Users] VoIP Business Weekly Article

2004-11-30 Thread Greg Boehnlein
My copy of VoIP Business Weekly came today and the main article on the front page is titled: Penguin to Assault PBX Market. Their premise is that Linux is driving the adoptation of Open voice standards in the market, and as such is poised to disrupt the dominance of market leaders. Third

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Cannot get two TE410Ps to operate correctly in the same machine

2004-11-26 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004, Rich Adamson wrote: [SNIP] What if you have a single port T1/E1 card from digium? No decision to be made really; you're going to sync from the other end if it goes higher in the hierarchical chain. If the port goes to a box consider lower in the chain, then the distant

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Just getting started...

2004-11-24 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004, Wilson Pickett wrote: Here's my current plan: snip Sounds like a plan? You asked for advice, here comes some that few will approve of :) FWIW I tried to get gnophone running and got no further than you did. What struck me though was that I have a very linux wise

Re: [Asterisk-Users] [OT] PoE switch question (Netgear FSM7326P works with Cisco)

2004-11-23 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: So, I ask again: given the choice between a sub-$100 16-port full-duplex 100Mb switch and external power supplies, and an over-$1000 12-port switch with internal power supply, which do you think is a better value for a small LAN? I can buy $20

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP 300 PoE?

2004-11-17 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Noah Miller wrote: I'm ordering some more phones - I have the Polycom IP 500's now and I like them. I need some less expensive phones, and I'd like to stay with all Polycoms for ease of administration. I've heard, though, that the IP 300's don't support PoE even

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom 500 software?

2004-11-14 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Rich Adamson wrote: That's not right. New phones come loaded with the current relevant firmware. Upgraded f/w is only available to/from certified resellers. Or look on the wiki for where it is freely available. The two new 500's that were purchased from a Polycom

Re: [Asterisk-Users] SysMaster and GPL Violation

2004-11-12 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Jeremy McNamara wrote: Here is a selected portion of the strings output: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# strings voipgw | grep Mark Written by Mark Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#strings voipgw | grep CVS Asterisk CVS-05/30/03-20:39:27 built by [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Linux and Windows

2004-11-05 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, Michael Giagnocavo wrote: Yes, there is network support. I tried it out, but the voice quality seemed quite choppy (local machine, P4 3GHz). Not sure if it'd actually work for any near-production scenarios. -Michael Being partly responsible for AstWind, the

Re: [Asterisk-Users] An anniversary and a lament for FXOs

2004-11-05 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Wed, 3 Nov 2004, Rich Adamson wrote: So, while I've posted with respect to FXOs previously, I must ask againwhat FXO interface device can anyone recommend from real experience? I'd have to agree with you 110%; exactly the same issues here over the past year. I've spent more money

[Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP 300 VoiceMail Retrieval

2004-11-05 Thread Greg Boehnlein
Hello, I have just picked up a pair of SoundPoint IP 300 phones for testing purposes, and they work great. Really good quality units for the price. I only have two complaints/issues with them; 1. The $40 additional cable for POE to work. That sucks. 2. I can't for the life of me figure

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Linux and Windows

2004-11-05 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Fri, 5 Nov 2004, Michael Giagnocavo wrote: CoLinux works great for IAX to IAX or SIP to IAX where no Disk Access is taking place. Thanks for clearing that up. I had been using it for IVRs. So if I created a RAM disk for CoLinux and booted it from there... that might work? You

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom IP 300 VoiceMail Retrieval

2004-11-05 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Fri, 5 Nov 2004, Greg Boehnlein wrote: Hello, I have just picked up a pair of SoundPoint IP 300 phones for testing purposes, and they work great. Really good quality units for the price. I only have two complaints/issues with them; 1. The $40 additional cable for POE to work

RE: [Asterisk-Users] high-capacity systems / trouble with Tyan

2004-10-30 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004, Michael Giagnocavo wrote: The only thing wrong with RedHat as far as asterisk is concerned is that they do something goofy with their kernels and all you need do is recompile a kernel from source. IMHO, you should always compile a kernel for your specific hardware.

[Asterisk-Users] Call Waiting Via Sipura to X100P

2004-10-27 Thread Greg Boehnlein
Hello, I am having a hard time sending a Flash Hook via my Analog - SPA-2000 - X100P - POTS connection. Anyone have any suggestions? When I hit flash-hook on the Analog phone the Sipura intercepts it and puts the caller on hold. I have no way of sending a flash-hook out the X100P to

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Digium TheVoice recordings' sound terrible

2004-10-27 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004, Joe Greco wrote: I know she works at Digium but they probably go down the street to a real sound stage to do the recordings via 3rd party. A sound stage is a facility used to create and process professional recordings. They can be used by anyone employed by an

Re: Svar: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Where to post SuSE 9.x startup script?

2004-10-21 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004, Claus Lavdal wrote: I would be very interested in the script that allow me to use saft_asterisk and non-root user on suse 9.1. Regards Claus Claus, Sorry it took a couple of days to get this information back to you, but I wanted to let you know that you can

Re: [Asterisk-Users] DUNDi in stable? (New subject)

2004-10-21 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Olle E. Johansson wrote: I wish it were in v1.0 as well. Would creating a patch for 1.0 be pretty simple, or do the code changes run deep? It will eventuall get into a release. But please, as a community, we have to refrain from temptation of adding new functions to

RE: [Asterisk-Users] QoS Router/Software Suggestions

2004-10-13 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Geoff Nordli wrote: Is this where we get to vote for our favorite router software? I choose Bering-uClibc (http://leaf.sourceforge.net/mod.php?mod=userpagemenu=910page_id=36). It comes with a ton of packages, and you can easily configure it to boot from HDD, or Compact

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.0 RPMS RH73 and RH9

2004-10-12 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, Pete Brown wrote: Greg, Which kernel are you using? I have two machines at home and the zaptel kernel module only runs properly on one of them... The P-3 box worked... kernel-2.4.20-30.9.i686.rpm RH73 Zaptel Modules are built against: 2.4.20_28.7.i386 RH9 Zaptel

Re: [Asterisk-Users] SNOM 200 availability

2004-10-12 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, Mark Phillips wrote: I had a rather unpleasant bait and switch episode with Atacomm today. They advertise on their website (and indeed quoted me for) the Snom 200 for $269 which, when I came to place an order for 15 of them, they didn't have but would like to replace with

RE: [Asterisk-Users] SNOM 200 availability

2004-10-12 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Everyone: We are a Snom authorized reseller and the problem with the Snom 200 is the fact that Snom has EOL that model. It is being replaced with the Snom 190. The reason there are no Snom 200's is these unit were taken out of production

Re: [Asterisk-Users] QoS Router/Software Suggestions

2004-10-12 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Matthew Boehm wrote: Switching to DSL would require me to get a phone line, which kinda defeats the purpose of doing VoIP. =) Matthew Matthew, for unparalelled hackability try the Linksys WRT54GS. It runs Linux, and supports QOS if you use the Sveasoft

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.0 RPMS RH73 and RH9

2004-09-26 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, Florin Andrei wrote: On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 05:47, Greg Boehnlein wrote: Anyone else having the problems that Gary is reporting? Um, well, not really. I'm rebuilding your package on Fedora 2 (kernel 2.6) and i had to add a linux 26 at the end of the make line

[Asterisk-Users] Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Simple Manager Proxy

2004-09-26 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, David Troy wrote: [deleted[ I had a need for a much simpler proxy than his op_server.pl; to meet my need I re-worked and simplified his code. See below for this simplified proxy: http://www.popvox.com/simpleproxy.pl Hehehehe.. I mentioned this in the Developer's

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.0 RPMS RH73 and RH9

2004-09-24 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Greg Boehnlein wrote: On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Gary Carr wrote: The RPMs had errors for me After installing RPMS and running modprobe zaptel I get /lib/modules/2.4.20-31.9/misc/zaptel.o: unresolved symbol register_chrdev_R07a6f6f0 /lib/modules/2.4.20-31.9

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.0 RPMS RH73 and RH9

2004-09-24 Thread Greg Boehnlein
Boehnlein Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 8:47 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.0 RPMS RH73 and RH9 On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Greg Boehnlein wrote: On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Gary Carr wrote: The RPMs had errors for me

[Asterisk-Users] 1.0 Mirrors

2004-09-23 Thread Greg Boehnlein
Hello, Please be conscious of Digium's bandwidth and use a Mirror when downloading 1.0. I have mirrored the tarballs at: ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/ Direct links: ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/asterisk-1.0.0.tar.gz ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/asterisk-sounds-1.0.0.tar.gz

[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.0 RPMS RH73 and RH9

2004-09-23 Thread Greg Boehnlein
Hello, Straight from the floor of Astricon 2004, I am happy to release my updated Asterisk 1.0 RPMS for RedHat 7.3 and RedHat 9.0 platform. Current Release --- asterisk-1.0-0 libpri-1.0-0 zaptel-1.0-0 kernel-module-zaptel-1.0-0 RedHat 7.3 --

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 1.0 RPMS RH73 and RH9

2004-09-23 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Gary Carr wrote: The RPMs had errors for me After installing RPMS and running modprobe zaptel I get /lib/modules/2.4.20-31.9/misc/zaptel.o: unresolved symbol register_chrdev_R07a6f6f0 /lib/modules/2.4.20-31.9/misc/zaptel.o: unresolved symbol

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk presence utility

2004-09-18 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Sat, 18 Sep 2004, Bill Seddon wrote: I've spent a couple of evenings writing a presence utility in C# so that a window, listing the currently registered SIP phones, can be displayed and a user can see who is on the phone and who is not. It uses the Manager API and works well, updating the

Re: [Asterisk-Users] astwind has any one got this thing to work?

2004-09-10 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004, hank smith wrote: I have a SiS 900 PCI Fast Ethernet Adapter what do I put in there or is that what I put in the xml file? Go read: http://www.colinux.org/wiki/index.php/coLinuxNetworking Specifically: If in doubt, the name of the card can be found in colinux-daemon

Re: [Asterisk-Users] astwind has any one got this thing to work?

2004-09-10 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004, hank smith wrote: is there going to be a gui for co linux and astwind? No. AstWind is just a Debian GNU Linux distribution with a precompiled Asterisk installation running under a CoLinux kernel. I will have to see if either there is going to be a gui or if yasr a screen

Re: [Asterisk-Users] iaxy vs sipura

2004-09-10 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004, Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists wrote: However, you could use VMware on an Intel notebook to run both Windoze and Linux concurrently. This wouldn't be ideal for a real PBX for performance reasons, but since all you are going to use Asterisk for is to be a gateway for

Re: [Asterisk-Users] astwind has any one got this thing to work?

2004-09-09 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, hank smith wrote: hello I am fitteling with the astwind-installer-0.1.1.exe asterisk for windows and am having trouble getting the thing to connect to the meers to download the updates and stuff. I looked at the wiki and set up networking and stuff with no success, has

Re: [Asterisk-Users] astwind has any one got this thing to work?

2004-09-09 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On 9 Sep 2004, khurram bhatti wrote: Well I wanted to test astwind and consulted * person he gave me this comment lord help us all ... why would you want to simulate a linux system on top of a windows system in the first place? It's not a simulated linux system. CoLinux is a kernel that

RE: [Asterisk-Users] astwind has any one got this thing to work?

2004-09-09 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, Chris HARIGA wrote: I make it work!! My Astwind is up and running! Now is 11:53 PM and I'm going to bed. Tomorrow morning I will post how I fix the Ethernet connection. I bet you followed the following directions! ;) From:

RE: [Asterisk-Users] astwind has any one got this thing to work?

2004-09-09 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004, Chris HARIGA wrote: [SNIP] !-- This allows you to modify networking parameters, see the README or website for more information -- network index=0 name=Intel(R) PRO/100+ Alert on LAN* Management Adapter type=bridged / /colinux Yep.. Don't you hate the

Re: [Asterisk-Users] astwind has any one got this thing to work?

2004-09-09 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004, arsal siddiqui wrote: dear khurram, i need to know the price for x100p. i've emailed convergence.com.pk and never get a reply. If you could help me in this regards, i'll be greatful. I need to know the price. send me an email off the list. if you can help me in

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Where to post SuSE 9.x startup script?

2004-09-09 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004, Martin Mielke wrote: Hi all, due to the rather big email traffic regarding this issue, I decided to publish the script so people can download it at their own risk... :-) Please, visit: http://www.leals.com/~mm/asterisk for further information. Regards,

Re: [Asterisk-Users] SNOM 200 can't conference.

2004-09-09 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004, Matt - Telcom Products wrote: Hello, Does anyone know how to conference a call on the SNOM 200 phone? Whenever I push the cnf/tran button it just hangs up on the active call. The manual says you have to push the cnf function key but it doesn't appear in the lcd on my

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Migrating Asterisk

2004-09-01 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, Jay Milk wrote: Hello All, My asterisk installation has now been running for over two months without a hitch, and I've decided it's time to move things around a bit. It's currently installed on a 2.7GHz Celeron under RH9 installed on a 10GB leftover drive. Thanks to

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Queue Announcement not until after # accept call pressed

2004-08-28 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Andrew Brown wrote: When using the callback feature on agents I notice that when the queue calls one of the agents and the agent picks up the call they hear nothing until pressing the # to accept the call. Only then does my announcement play back to the agent after

Re: [Asterisk-Users] POE

2004-08-28 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Sat, 28 Aug 2004, Michael Welter wrote: Since the Cisco 79XX phones preceded the PoE standard, they are different--polarity is reversed. IANAE, but as I understand the PoE devices, there are two types--one always applies -48VDC to the brown pair while the other senses (as per the PoE

Re: [Asterisk-Users] POE

2004-08-28 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Sat, 28 Aug 2004, Michael Welter wrote: Greg Boehnlein wrote: On Sat, 28 Aug 2004, Michael Welter wrote: Since the Cisco 79XX phones preceded the PoE standard, they are different--polarity is reversed. IANAE, but as I understand the PoE devices, there are two types--one always

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk and software Raid

2004-08-24 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004, William Boehlke wrote: Consider hot swappable SCSI RAID 1 instead of IDE. You'll appreciate it every couple of years when you lose a disk but the PBX stays up. I hot swap on my 3Ware IDE RAID card all the time. -- Vice President of N2Net, a New Age Consulting

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk and software Raid

2004-08-21 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Sat, 21 Aug 2004, Ed Devine wrote: I've got a Dual Xeon system Digium Quad T1 and an Idle T1 circuit that I can experiment with. I've been wanting to use Redhat with software Raid 1 on an Asterisk server. Has anyone had any experience with software raid and Asterisk? Also, if the

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk and software Raid

2004-08-21 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Sat, 21 Aug 2004, Lyle Giese wrote: I used software raids and want to get away from them. I really really like Microlite's BackupEdge tape backup software. BackupEdge does not work with a software raid, only a hardware raid. The second kicker was that the Promise (or any other)

Re: [Asterisk-Users] ::::: Pssst. Rc2! :::::::

2004-08-12 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Olle E. Johansson wrote: If you look into the download areas, you'll find Asterisk 1.0 release candidate two... Find the mirrors on the link below, they'll update during the day if they don't already have RC2. Please don't hit the Digium FTP-server, since development

Re: [Asterisk-Users] tdm400p lockups

2004-08-06 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Fri, 6 Aug 2004, Joshua M. Thompson wrote: On Fri, 2004-08-06 at 10:16 +, Ryan Courtnage wrote: Are you using a newer zaptel build? If so, make sure you didn't get caught by bug #2218. wcfxs had an error introduced this week, which is now resolved in HEAD. It's possible,

Re: [Asterisk-Users] ASTERISK AND 120 CONCURRENT CALLS

2004-08-06 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Fri, 6 Aug 2004, Robert Hajime Lanning wrote: Well, the G729 codec would need to be recompiled to take advantage of the 64bit arch. I've got a Dual Opteron box running Gento x86_64. If someone could point me in the right direction and provide some training on how to test this, I'd be

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Rodopi Billing

2004-08-04 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Tue, 3 Aug 2004, Tom wrote: At 07:08 PM 8/3/2004, you wrote: That sigh will turn to cursing after a couple of months. We currently use Rodopi, have for 10 years but the inflexability is too much to deal with anymore so we are moving away from it. To what? I am also a cursed Rodopi

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Rodopi Billing

2004-08-04 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, Jeremy McNamara wrote: Greg Boehnlein wrote: We use Platypus from Boardtown, which was just acquired by Tucows. Although it has it's quirks, having seen Rodopi, Emerald, Prism and ISPEasy in action, I'll take Platypus ANY day! I have a method for hacking VoIP

[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Tapi Driver for Windows

2004-08-03 Thread Greg Boehnlein
Hello, I am attempting to get the asttapi driver working on Windows XP Professional, and am running into some strange problems. I've combed the Web and the Wiki for information on debugging the application to see if I can solve my issue, but nothing is helping me. I have tried the

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Collect recording before sending to extension or queue

2004-08-01 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, James H. Cloos Jr. wrote: Has anyone does this with *? Ie, ask for the caller's name and provide that to the callee before bridging? For calls to an extension, it should be doable via the dialplan. For calls to queues, some changes would be required to app_queue.c

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Astricon Conference Call?

2004-07-30 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, Mike Machado wrote: Another thing you could do is use a regular phone to call into a DID and enter the conference, then everybody can join that conference and listen. No bandwidth required, just a phone call to the distributor's Asterisk server. Then just keep that

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Astricon Conference Call?

2004-07-30 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, Steve Woolley wrote: I thought the interesting exercise would be to use asterisk for the task. Couldn't we use a kind of distributed conference call where a few key select/high bandwidth asterisk servers form the main conference and then have multiple layers of

Re: [Asterisk-Users] BugetTone Bug Showstopper,

2004-07-28 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, Philipp von Klitzing wrote: Hi! When TRANSFERING a call to another extension, if you enter an invalid extension, (I.e. Hit TRANSFER, then dial erroneous number.. SEND, Congestion tone, Hang-up, go off-hook.. Try different solutions to try to get call back But

Re: [Asterisk-Users] drivers, kernel 2.6 and distribution

2004-07-26 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Wed, 26 May 2004, Steve Totaro wrote: Fedora 2 core put up a little fight but not much. I installed Gentoo on my Dual Opteron box w/ a completely native x86_64 2.6.7 kernel, and was able to get my X101P working w/ Zaptel by simply doing make linux26. Works great in 64 bit mode. -

RE: [Asterisk-Users] 'Asterisk for Small Office Setup'

2004-07-25 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Sun, 25 Jul 2004, Jay Milk wrote: Surely you mean grammar? Sorry, I just had to point that out :) Personally, I'd take issue with the title -- if you need to do a small-office setup by-the-book, then chances are you're not resourceful enough to find the required information online --

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Astricon costs...

2004-07-22 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, Steven Sokol wrote: Has anyone really looked at the costs for Astricon. But the hotel costs. $111.00 USD per night.. come on guys give me a break. I will not be staying at that hotel. I can rent a car and stay near the air port for almost half that. In

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Astricon costs...

2004-07-22 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Thu, 22 Jul 2004, Mike Reed wrote: If you haven't been to Atlanta before, their public transportation is decent, too. Train runs right to the airport, and straight into town. Last few conferences I've had there, the train elt me off within 2 blocks of my hotel. That is what I was hoping

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Anyone heard of BroadVox direct?

2004-07-22 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, Jay Milk wrote: Just received: Cognigen is very proud to announce the official launch of Broadvox Direct, a new VOIP service. Broadvox Direct offers unlimited calling plans to anywhere in the US and Canada for a low monthly payment starting at $29.95 and basic

[Asterisk-Users] Updated RPMS for Asterisk-1.0 RC1

2004-07-17 Thread Greg Boehnlein
Hello all, Hot on the announcement this morning by Mark, I have updated and rebuilt new Asterisk RPMS for RedHat 7.3, 8, 9 and Fedora Core 1. Please feel free to install these and beat them up. The usual disclaimer applies.. These haven't been tested, not reccomended for production use,

RE: [Asterisk-Users] VoIP hackers gut Caller ID

2004-07-09 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, brian wrote: Anyone with a PRI/ISDN line can set callerid to anything... Not just voip, not just asterisk. Come on guys. bkw Yes, but the Telco has the ability to either pass or deny that. In my X/O PRI configuration, I can only set the CallerID to a number within the

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Updated Grandstream configurator

2004-07-09 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Neil Cherry wrote: Stephen R. Besch wrote: The most recent version of GSConfigure is available at www.buffalo.edu/~sbesch Several serious bugs that kept the program from getting started have been ferreted out and corrected with the help of Bruce Komito. The

[Asterisk-Users] Debian Unstable Claims Asterisk 1.0-1

2004-07-09 Thread Greg Boehnlein
Howdy, I just did an apt-get dist-upgrade on my Debian unstable box, and noticed that the Asterisk version appears to be 1.0-1 in the unstable tree. I KNOW that 1.0 hasn't been released yet, so I am wondering who is responsible for the Debian packages? This will be VERY VERY confusing

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Dead Budgetone-101?

2004-06-29 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004, Max Lock wrote: Hi Folks, Since there isn't a grandstream forum AFAIK I guess someone here may be able to shed some light on this. Apologies if this is viewed as offtopic.. I think I may have killed the firmware on my Grandstream Budgetone 101. I found a

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Customized Call Parking

2004-06-29 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On 29 Jun 2004, Adnan Shah wrote: Hi ! I need a solution to park incoming calls to an extension of my choice where a special announcement is played, park subsequent calls to specific pools so that they listen to announcements of my choice. any ideas ? Put up a bounty on it of a

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Linksys

2004-05-31 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Mon, 31 May 2004, Tony Hoyle wrote: Stefan de Konink wrote: Is Asterisk not a *little bit* too much for that processor? SER could be a better choice? The asterisk binary alone is larger than the total flash ram space on the linksys. I really doubt it's going to work That

RE: [Asterisk-Users] * on Opteron

2004-05-31 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Mon, 31 May 2004, usedcanon wrote: I have used with Athlon 64, but noth opteron. Can imagine it being much different though. I'll let you know in a couple of weeks when my Dual Opteron workstation is finished. -- Vice President of N2Net, a New Age Consulting Service, Inc. Company

<    1   2   3   >