ViciDial doesn't work that way, you have to use the agent web interface or
the API to disposition a call.
MATT---
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:04 AM, mahesh katta wrote:
> Hi ,
> In vicidial dialer
> I need small Dialplan require. when i call from hardphone , in that has
> 1to9 no.s i want define
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Jose P. Espinal wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> A few days ago I installed ViciDial on a server, and while looking to
> the default 'extensions.conf' file, I saw this line:
>
>
> exten => _010*010*010*015*.,1,Dial(${TRUNKTESTast}/${EXTEN:16},55,oT)
>
>
> Can someone point
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 2:56 PM, bilal ghayyad wrote:
> Hi All;
>
> I would like to use Asterisk for a call center, but really does not know if
> Asterisk support the following in a good way:
>
> 1) Ability to do an inteligent routing, so to route the call to the proper
> skill group based on the
ViciBox actually gives you the option of using the 2.2.1 release or
SVN/trunk versions ViciDial
Also, ViciBox is the officially supported ISO installer of the ViciDial
project.
But, both ViciBox and ViciDialNow are Linux ISO installers that will give
you a functional ViciDial system.
Thanks,
M
Hello,
STDERR goes to the original Asterisk process only, not any "asterisk -r"
connections that you may use. If you launch Asterisk in a "screen" like we
do, then you can see it and log it in context with when the output is
happening. We find it very useful to do it this way.
MATT---
On 1/7/10
DNS doesn't seem to resolve, looks like one of those unfortunate Domain name
registration decisions where the DNS servers and all contact email addresses
for the domain are from the domain itself:
NETXUSA.COM
Administrative Contact:
x...@netxusa.com
Technical Contact:
x...@netxusa.com
Domain se
On 10/21/09, David Backeberg wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:36 AM, Robin wrote:
> > Thanks for your response.
> > The hardware I have now is not sufficient to set up a ramdisk (just 4
> gb)...
> > But memory is rather cheap nowadays. If i'd buf up the server with 8 extra
> > gigs for use
hope to give loads of (usefull) code to
> the vicidial project by the end of the year. Looking forward to it!
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 17:11, Matt Florell wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > We use RAM to record to on almost all systems we set up, although we
> > usual
Hello,
We use RAM to record to on almost all systems we set up, although we
usually use tmpfs, instead of a fixed RAM drive, because it is more
flexible.
The number of recordings you can handle is dependant on how long the
calls are. What would your average, minimum, maximum recording lengths
be?
Hello,
ViciDial has IVR logging(pre-Queue) of IVRs set up through our web
interface(we call them Call Menus), but ViciDial does not use Asterisk
queues at all and it's logging is done entirely in a MySQL database. As a
side note, the logging done by ViciDial (non-IVR of course) is also fully
compa
Hello,
This changed years ago, and originally it was the 'p' dial option(for
"preserve" CallerID). The reason we are told for the change was for
calls being transferred within a company that originated on outside
lines, so that you would know who the transfer was coming from. I
didn't understand
Hello,
You know we do have a very active ViciDial forum:
http://www.vicidial.org/VICIDIALforum/index.php
MATT---
On 8/15/09, Tareq Kibria wrote:
>
>
> Plz mention what type of information do u need.
>
> So that i can collect ..
>
> ---tareq
>
> --- On Sat, 8/15/09, Alex Balashov wrote:
>
>
> F
On 8/4/09, Brian Thompson wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> We currently have a scenario where a large percentage of inbound
> calls on a telco PRI are intended for professors who aren't currently
> in their offices/at their desks.
>
> My question is, is anyone actively using the Asterisk "RLT" (Release
> 2009/7/21 Matt Florell
> > On 7/21/09, Jose Arias wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I'm planning to develop a custom autodialer application which will be
> > > dealing with its own model for agents and queues, therefore it won't use
On 7/21/09, Jose Arias wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm planning to develop a custom autodialer application which will be
> dealing with its own model for agents and queues, therefore it won't use
> neither asterisk agents nor asterisk queues, nor asterisk cdr. The
> application will supply the whole repo
On 7/17/09, Alex Balashov wrote:
> Rupert Utteridge - Digital Techniques (Austalia) Limited wrote:
>
> > We are trying to implement skill based routing for agents in a support
> > centre based on the agent login. Has anyone had any experience with this
> > and what was the outcome?
>
>
> It can
On 7/8/09, Steve Totaro wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 2:14 AM, Olivier wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Reading this thread, is this correct to say CallerName is widely used in
> the
> > US ?
> >
> > Here in France, this service is optional but I don't think many companies
> > are subscribing to i
On 6/17/09, Gordon Henderson wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, Steve Totaro wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Quick question to the real world.
> >
> > Approx what specs would I need on server to handle 95 ZAP or Dahdi -> SIP
> > gateway using G729 on the SIP to carrier side (nothing else, just media
>
ial related to http://www.contacttel.com/ ?
>
> http://www.contacttel.com/
> http://www.vicidial.com/
>
> the same female face is looking from these websites :)
>
>
> Martin
>
>
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Matt Florell wrote:
>
> > OK, enough
nd is open source?
MATT---
On 5/18/09, Alex Balashov wrote:
> Nah, the real problem with this post is that Vicidial is just so *bad*.
> No offense to Matt Florell and all; it just is.
>
>
> Martin wrote:
>
> > On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
Hello,
I would suggest that you first methodically try every possible
combination of zaptel.conf timing settings(each change follwed by a
hard reboot of the Asterisk server) to see if there is a magic
combination of settings that will work. I don't know if you have the
time for that, or if it take
s,10,Goto(s|12)
> exten => s,11,Playback(${ARG1})
>
> please suggest our what might be the problem.
>
> Any help is highly appreciated.
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Matt Florell wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> &g
On 4/23/09, Sam Hawkin wrote:
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I am trying to use the AMD (Answering Machine Detect).
> But it is not sending the AMD_Status as either
> the Human or Machine, it hangs up in middle.
>
> can any one suggest us, what might be the problem
> and possible solution to it.
>
> below is t
On 4/14/09, Max Metral wrote:
>
> I’m trying to get “blind transfer” from an incoming DAHDI line to an
> external number to work on an * 1.6 install using a T1 from XO. The
> documentation is very “distributed” and incomplete, so while it’s not
> working, it’s definitely more likely my error some
Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] New ViciDial Call Center Suite Release: 2.0.5
>
> Great !
> thank you very much for your job!
> BR,
>
> Matt Florell a écrit :
> > Hello,
> >
> > We've released another update to our V
4 a software-only upgrade would only get
you part of the way.
Thanks for the catch on the date, it has been fixed now.
MATT---
> Am Freitag, den 03.04.2009, 10:30 -0400 schrieb Matt Florell:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > We've released another update to o
Hello,
We've released another update to our VICIDIAL/astGUIclient call center
suite: 2.0.5
http://astguiclient.sf.net/
The call center suite client applications run on most modern web
browsers on almost any GUI-capable operating system, and it includes
the VICIDIAL call center suite.
This packag
On 3/20/09, Cary Fitch wrote:
> I am trying to get a queue to do more than just play music and hold calls.
> Specifically, making some "comforting" voice announcements would be nice.
>
> Below is the queues.conf file relevant portions.
>
> Member phone number is munged to protect the guilty.
>
On 2/20/09, John Todd wrote:
>
> Mark and Ed received word today that the long-awaited RFC for IAX2 has
> been approved by the IETF, and is now published:
>
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc5456.txt
>
> Thanks to Ed Guy, Mark Spencer, Brian Capouch, Frank Miller, and Kenny
> Shumard! L
On 2/13/09, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> Matt Florell wrote:
>
> > My understanding is that this setting lets you ignore the timing
> > signal coming from the other end of one of the ports, and the card
> > will take another timing source from a port that you specify a
On 2/13/09, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> Matt Florell wrote:
>
> > Can you tell me where the setting is to force Master timing on Digium
> > cards per port? I really didn't think Digium cards had the ability to
> > force Master in this way. I've tried to do it
On 2/13/09, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> Matt Florell wrote:
>
> > If you want to be able to set Master timing you will have to use
> > Sangoma cards, they allow you force the timing in the wanrouter
> > configuration. I have done extensive testing with crossover T1/E1/PR
On 2/13/09, Tom Moore wrote:
> The cable needed for this is a different cable than an ethernet cross over.
> I have actually done this same thing today with a Samsung 100 system and
> Asterisk 1.4.20.1 and Zaptel 1.4.11 and things work great.
I would again just recommend getting one of these, t
On 2/13/09, Alex Balashov wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:48:11 + (GMT), Lee Wilson
> wrote:
>
>
> > Alex, thanks for the quick response.
> >
> > So I can assume from your response this should work. That was easy :-)
> >
> > I just want to clarify before I got and buy anything the
On 1/30/09, Mark Michelson wrote:
> Matt Florell wrote:
> > Yep, my bad I found them once I searched with the dash '-' after the
> > 1.4.23. They were lost in the flood of users list mail in my inbox.
> >
> > I wonder if these could also be posted on
, Tilghman Lesher wrote:
> On Thursday 29 January 2009 16:00:14 Matt Florell wrote:
> > For a while we were seeing RC(release cantidates) release
> > announcements and I can see that there were RC release for this 1.4.23
> > release. Any reason they aren't being publiciz
For a while we were seeing RC(release cantidates) release
announcements and I can see that there were RC release for this 1.4.23
release. Any reason they aren't being publicized, or am I just looking
in the wrong place?
We always do compatibility testing before putting a new release in
production
You can download the free manuals and buy the full paid-for manuals at:
http://www.eflo.net
MATT---
On 1/26/09, David fire wrote:
> where i can buy the vicidial manual?
> thanks
> David
>
> 2009/1/26 ram
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 1/23/09, David @ULC wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > But after
The astguiclient/VICIDIAL project is very much alive. There were
several updates to the 2.0.4 release put out over the last year and we
have actually been so busy and so much has changed in the development
trunk that we have not had time to put out a full proper release. The
latest stable code is o
On 12/28/08, jonathan augenstine wrote:
> Matt,
>
> Asterisk version == 1.4.22
> dtmfmode == info
> calls are bridged through Asterisk (canreinvite=no)
>
> Jonathan
Have you tried setting dtmfmode to 'inband' for both SIP endpoints?
MATT---
> On Sun, Dec
On 12/28/08, jonathan augenstine wrote:
> I am trying to resolve an issue and I believe it is my configuration. The
> scenario is that I have a SIP detected on the server. The dial plan then
> makes a local connection to another part of the dial plan. The new dial
> plan extension then places a
On 11/21/08, Alex Balashov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Matt Florell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> >> just keep in mind that in
> >> my opinion the 1.4 tree did not become usable until 1.4.18 when most
> >&
On 11/21/08, Tilghman Lesher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 21 November 2008 09:42:12 Matt Florell wrote:
> > On 11/20/08, Steve Totaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > You also have
> > > people like Matt Florell who have continued to
ECTED]/tzafrir
> >
>
>
> I still compile and install 1.2 for the most part, for call centers
> and large systems.
>
> The few 1.4 installs that I have done have been for "medium" sized
> PBXs, say 50-70 phones/users and they have been trouble free for the
> mo
Hello,
The paid VICIDIAL user manuals do not cover installing on Trixbox.
Mostly because it can be very difficult to install VICIDIAL on Trixbox
due to the many different versions of Trixbox and the dialplan
complexity of Trixbox.(also I want to mention that there are FREE
versions of the VICIDIAL
Hello,
If you are looking for a list of Call Center software packages that
work with Asterisk then take a look here:
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Predictive+dialer
There are over 20 now I believe.
MATT---
On 10/1/08, broadband Voice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I stumbled upon this call
g Aastra phones or Linksys ATA.
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 3, 2007 at 3:03 AM, Matt Florell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > We've released another update to our astGUIclient-VICIDIAL suite: 2.0.4
> >
> > http://astguiclient.sf.ne
On 9/16/08, Tony Mountifield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>
> Alex Balashov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Al Baker wrote:
> > > Steve Totaro wrote:
>
> > >> Although it is commercial, Queuemetrics is a good place to look if you
> > >> want to pay for a feature ri
I just wanted to note that we do have a very active community forum
for VICIDIAL available at:
http://www.eflo.net/VICIDIALforum/index.php
MATT---
On 8/20/08, Alex Balashov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You need to install the MySQL client libraries and MySQL driver for
> Perl-DBI.
>
>
> mahboob
On 8/15/08, Don Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. The carrier you are connected to must be licensed for it and have the
> necessary software, if the carrier requires, your circuit(s) must be
> provisioned for it. The originating/destination carriers shouldn't matter.
Most carrier sales peopl
On 8/11/08, aymen warfalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I got one HP ProLiant DL380 G5 - Quad-Core Xeon E5440 2.83 with 4 gig RAM
> I install Centos 5.2 64 bit and it is rumming pretty well and I need to
> use it as voice
> conferencing application (Meetme) server for high number of users fit
On 8/11/08, aymen warfalli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I got one HP ProLiant DL380 G5 - Quad-Core Xeon E5440 2.83 with 4 gig RAM
> I install Centos 5.2 64 bit and it is rumming pretty well and I need to
> use it as voice
> conferencing application (Meetme) server for high number of users fit
If that's the only set of errors it might be a PHP/Apache error.
I would recommend posting on the VICIDIAL Forums if you can't get it to work:
http://www.eflo.net/VICIDIALforum
MATT---
On 8/8/08, Brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent
We have done this several times for customers with VICIDIAL. I have
also seen companies use AGI scripts to enable this kind of application
as well. So, yes it is possible.
MATT---
On 8/7/08, bilal ghayyad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> CRM: Customer Record Module which is any kind of application.
>
On 7/17/08, Alex Balashov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Florell wrote:
>
> > But seriously, Asterisk is a better example of doing things right more
> > recently, a couple of years ago all sorts of stuff went into the
> > "stable" releases of Aster
On 7/17/08, Alex Balashov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Florell wrote:
>
> > No apologies necessary, I think a lot of what you said is mostly true.
>
>
> Well, thank you. I really appreciate that you're willing to entertain
> what I am saying without c
dering it, or at least earning the ire and distaste
> of many other list members, most certainly including the authors.
>
> But, that's no reason for self-censorship. So, with apologies to Matt
> Florell and others:
>
> Personally, I've found that ViciDIAL general
Hello,
You can try posting on the VICIDIAL forums asking for feedback from
average users:
http://www.eflo.net/VICIDIALforum/index.php
MATT---
On 7/16/08, Ein Bielaczyc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 1:35 AM, Matt Florell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> &g
Hello,
I am the creator of VICIDIAL(which makes me a bit biased) and there
are over 700 installations that we know of in use in over 70 countries
around the world right now. It is stable and has a very high uptime
percentage in properly installed and scaled systems, and we have done
installations
Is there any way you could get a cut-sheet from Verizon. I know they
are difficult to work with, but it would help to see for sure if your
circuit is indeed Loop-start. You could always try E&M_wink or E&M
immediate and see if there is any change.
MATT---
On 7/8/08, Daniel Hazelbaker <[EMAIL PROT
Hello,
We have done all sorts of customized recording archiving solutions
like this with both Asterisk and VICIDIAL. Some of them housing
millions of recordings that are stored on archive servers and are
available through web-form for download instantly.
We have also worked with programs like Ore
a lot on the callerIDs.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Florell
> Sent: June 13, 2008 8:20 AM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] World
Hello,
I guess I am one of the lucky few to have one of these handy
screwdrivers and it saved me when my son(aged 2) somehow locked
himself in a bedroom and couldn't unlock the door. The door knob
needed a very small slotted screwdriver to twist-unlock the door and
the Digium tweeker(which was als
Hello,
We have set up dozens of call centers, some using Asterisk Queues and
the rest using VICIDIAL Call Center Suite. What you want can easily be
accomplished with an average server and Asterisk Queues with not too
much effort using standard Asterisk configuration features. we have
set up a smal
You are correct, a company that is outside of the USA does not fall
under the laws of the USA. I said that myself.
I also said that a company that is INSIDE of the USA or has operations
INSIDE of the USA is subject to the laws of the USA.
This includes companies that are based in the USA that use
scrubbing (not the legal definition,
> but the practical definition of removing people that are on the DNC
> lists), then who is going to complain?
>
> Thanks,
> Steve T
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 8:19 AM, Matt Florell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
pest Predictive Dialer!
>
> My guess is that they are outside of the FTC's jurisdiction.
>
> Thanks,
> Steve T
>
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 6:15 AM, Matt Florell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> _
Hello,
This looks an awful lot like an advertisement for a commercial
product, which is only allowed on the biz list. Which you already
posted this message to this week.
I'm kind of confused. How do you get cheaper than free? Are you paying
people to use your dialer?
One other thing, it is illeg
Hello,
I would recommend that if you do add another tech track that you spend
a great deal of effort trying to make sure that sessions that would
appeal to similar audiances are not done at the same time. This has
happened a few times in past Astricons and it's always a tough choice
for attendees
SIP trunks, and another has SIP agents with calls
coming in over Zap T1 channels.
MATT---
On 6/8/08, Matt Florell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The load is usually quite high because this is VICIDIAL inbound call
> center traffic with full Asterisk-based recording. On a
, Steve Totaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt,
>
> Could you share the CPU usage, memory, and load average in the
> scenario you describe? What type of ULAW channels
> (SIP,DAHDI,IAX), or does it not matter?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve Totaro
>
>
> On
Hello,
We routinely run meetme with over 140 ULAW channels connected to 70
meetme rooms with no issues on an Intel Core 2 Quad core CPU.
The major factor in capacity would be your CPU and RAM capacity. If
you have at least a base-level P4 you don't need to worry about 12
participants.
MATT---
O
I think this is a bit beyond the average users-list question. There
are very few people who do 2BCT and it was quite difficult to get
anyone to help last year when I was trying to get it working on NI2 in
libpri. I'm not really sure how to go about what you are asking, but I
would suggest getting o
Hello,
In Asterisk you can type "zap show status" to at least show you some
basic error information:
CLI> zap show status
Description Alarms IRQbpviol CRC4
wanpipe1 card 0 OK 0 0 0
wanpipe2 card 1
Apple Quicktime or WavePad on Windows and Mac.
As for Linux, your options are zgsmplay or SoX unless you can get
Quicktime to work.
MATT---
On 5/15/08, Julian Lyndon-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a lot of recordings from asterisk in a .gsm format. I would like
> to play these files
Hello,
The capacity greatly depends on the rate of calls entering and leaving
those conferences.
I see that you do call center systems so I would guess that the rate
would be fairly rapid.
It is really something you have to test and see. Using VICIDIAL in
performance testing mode I have gotten t
Hello,
I have quite a bit of experience with E&M Wink T1s, and I have seen
the problem you describe twice. In both cases it was either the
carrier's equipment or the wiring somewhere between the carrier shelf
and your equipment.
In one case it was water in the line that would seem to cause the
pr
On 5/9/08, Steve Totaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Matt Florell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 5/9/08, Philipp Kempgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Matt Florell schrieb:
> >>
> >> > I
On 5/9/08, Philipp Kempgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Florell schrieb:
>
> > I built VICIDIAL around AGIs, manager interface daemons and
> > agents in meetme rooms.
>
>
> Sounds a bit scary. Doing everything in MeetMe rooms just doesn't
> "fe
reshold. In addition, I use a database to keep track of the
> queues to load balance.
>
> Can you elaborate more on what VICIDIAL does that my method does not.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve Totaro
>
>
> On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 8:38 AM, Matt Florell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
Hello,
You can cluster "queues" across several servers with VICIDIAL. We have
clients with hundreds of seats taking in hundreds of lines across
multiple Asterisk servers, and the calls are distributed to agents on
all systems.
MATT---
On 5/9/08, Vieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- Vieri
On 5/6/08, Asterisk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I would like to ask you, if any of you has any experiences with the
> predictive dialers available for Asterisk? Are open source predictive dialers
> such as VICIDIAL Dialer any good?
>
> Which one would you recommend for a ca. 45 se
On 4/28/08, Jay R. Ashworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:15:42AM +1000, Rob Hillis wrote:
> >Two dual core processors would should four processors - each processor
> has
> >two virtual processors for a total of four.
>
> I *think* Rob wrote that; *please*, peo
to dialing are
primarily to prevent fishing for numbers with no intention of
contacting people that first time you are calling them.
It sounds like you are doing service level verification calling, which
is very different from war dialing. Especially since you control the
numbers you are calling.
Hello,
Sequential auto-dialing like this is pretty much illegal in the USA.
The FTC has specific regulations against this as well as several
states.
Obligatory Simpsons reference:
http://www.internerd.com/frink.retired/frinkv.3/inventions/at5000-2.gif
http://www.snpp.com/episodes/4F01.html
MAT
On 4/25/08, Jared Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 18:48 +, Arthur wrote:
> > I still hope someone would enlighten us by his experience in doing
> > call recordings without recording to RAM Drive.
>
>
> I can't speak for Steve's solution (as I'm not sure exactly what
On 4/14/08, Jay R. Ashworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 03:24:02PM -0400, Matt Florell wrote:
> > > > As for contributed code, we require a statement of "this is my code
> > > > and the project can use it and redistribute it&qu
On 4/14/08, Jay R. Ashworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 02:47:12PM -0400, Matt Florell wrote:
> > On 4/14/08, Jay R. Ashworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 01:54:22PM -0400, Matt Florell wrote:
> > &
On 4/14/08, Eugen Soare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Matt.
>
> Thanks for the reply and Link. That should get me started looking at
> that. Unfortunately, coming from the Nortel world. It may take some time to
> get up to speed on things. The hardest part (as I see it) is getting
> hardware
On 4/14/08, Jay R. Ashworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 01:54:22PM -0400, Matt Florell wrote:
> > With VICIDIAL you can do inbound/outbound/blended call handling and
> > there are all sorts of features for call handling and agent functions.
>
On 4/14/08, Eugen Soare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm glad so much has been sent about on the thread I create (bloated ego
> head> :) ) It has gotten my curiosity up.
> What is VICIDIAL?
> Is it Public Domain?
> Pay for Software?
> What's it all about? (not looking for all the features,
On 4/14/08, Jay R. Ashworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 04:39:39PM -0700, Steve Edwards wrote:
> > The "shell script" approach has the advantage of "light weight." I do a
> > "minimal" Centos 5 install and wget a single script which does everything
> > -- configures the
On 4/10/08, Jay R. Ashworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 05:49:26PM -0400, Al Baker wrote:
> > Please share more about this.
> >
> > What/How are you "clustering" the boxes ?
> >
> > Is this all VOIP or TDMF front and VOIP for agents in back ?
> >
> > What kind of Bo
Hello,
It might not be Digium's fault, I ran into similar problems with Dell
2950 servers and other PCIexpress cards. I even went so far as to have
several components replaced by Dell on one of the affected servers to
no avail. After many months of banging my head against a wall I
stumbled across
Hello,
We achieve this using an AGI script in the VICIDIAL project for our
version of inbound queues. You start MoH then when you stream a sound
to the channel it will stop MoH then after the sound is done you start
MoH back up again. Probably a bit more involved than what you want,
but it dose wo
Are you using 64bit Linux?
Do you have more than 4GB of RAM?
Have you contacted Sangoma support?
MATT---
On 3/23/08, Alex Balashov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alex Balashov wrote:
>
> > I'm running kernel 2.6.19 (tried 2.6.24.3 but had to downgrade as
> > wanpipe stuff would not compile), za
On 3/19/08, Benny Amorsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Matt Florell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > But seriously, several of my clients use SIP exclusively, passing tens
> > of thousand of calls a day on Asterisk 1.2.X with no issues. I have
> &g
On 3/18/08, Benny Amorsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Steve Totaro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I will probably continue this train of thought (1.2.X is more
> > production ready) until these threads stop popping up on the list.
>
>
> I think you're being too kind to 1.2.x. It has numerou
On 3/18/08, Ben Willcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> A million calls sounds good, but 2 weeks, not so good. It's a bit
> disappointing to me that crashing /ever/ is acceptable, I had always had
> the understanding that asterisk was supposed to be rock-solid. I suppose
> it's some consolation t
I would suggest upgrading to at least 1.4.18. I was able to run it for
about 2 weeks and almost one million calls before I could get it to
crash, and the 1.4.19RC2 seems to fix even more of the locking issues
as well. I know a lot of these problems still existed under 1.4.17.
MATT---
On 3/18/08,
1 - 100 of 342 matches
Mail list logo
