RE: [Asterisk-Users] Pricing for DS3000P

2005-06-04 Thread Matt Klein
Keep in mind that softswitch hardware + licensing costs ~$25k-35k/DS3, at least on a decent platform. Yearly support is on average, $10k/year. Meta has good rates. $4k is cheap, especially for this market. Now will they ever bother to produce compactpci boards? Probably not any time soon.

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Pricing for DS3000P

2005-06-04 Thread Matt Klein
FYI: TNTs are $6-7k, fully loaded DS-3s including all DSP's on ebay. On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, izo wrote: On 6/2/05, Andrew Latham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't know, but pricing it per line whould be safe. Say $100 per line that would be $67,200.00. So anything less than that would be

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Pricing for DS3000P

2005-06-04 Thread Matt Klein
Cisco's somewhat reliable firmware, of course. ;) On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Pavel Jezek wrote: what's so special about eg. ci$co cards... WS-X6608-E1= Catalyst 6000 8 port Voice E1 and Services Module USD 19,995.00 ;-) PJ Tom Fanning wrote: What's so special about Digium cards that makes them

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Pricing for DS3000P

2005-06-04 Thread Matt Klein
4 to 1 ratio... is the industry standard for voice. 10 to 1 is dialup. Some raise it. I'm, personally, waiting a year or so to hear about the complaints from the lists before I bother. -m On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com wrote: On Sat, 2005-06-04 at 09:50 +0100, Tom

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Pricing for DS3000P

2005-06-04 Thread Matt Klein
On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com wrote: On Sat, 2005-06-04 at 05:48 -0700, Matt Klein wrote: 4 to 1 ratio... is the industry standard for voice. 10 to 1 is dialup. Some raise it. As I said my numbers were dated, and I didnt know what they were now. 10:1 is horrible

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Pricing for DS3000P

2005-06-04 Thread Matt Klein
Mike, ebay for Carrier Access, CAC, Widebank -- this turn DS-3s into T-1s. $500-$600 -- current market rate. -m On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Michael D Schelin wrote: Are you kidding! $4000.00 is cheap for a ds3 board! Even if you don't use all of the 28 t1's it's better because you will now be able

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Pricing for DS3000P

2005-06-04 Thread Matt Klein
OK, at first, I thought you were kidding me. Now I know, you are kidding me. PC hardware, at $12k? Give me a break. Besides, I already have estimated cost quotes from digium. Joker. -m On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Andrew Latham wrote: Thanks Mike. existing DS3 card -

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Pricing for DS3000P

2005-06-04 Thread Matt Klein
my phone, this time. Otherwise, leave a message. -m On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: On Saturday 04 June 2005 17:31, Matt Klein wrote: Mike, ebay for Carrier Access, CAC, Widebank -- this turn DS-3s into T-1s. $500-$600 -- current market rate. Ok smartass now what do you use

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Pricing for DS3000P

2005-06-04 Thread Matt Klein
kk ;) On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: On Saturday 04 June 2005 18:15, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: Ok smartass now what do you use to terminate those 28 T1s? Let's see... $1500 per quad T1 card, 7 cards required... 4 systems required (2 cards per system)... oh HELL YEAH, you just

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Pricing for DS3000P

2005-06-04 Thread Matt Klein
$4k is beautiful get them to cpci it, though, and you're looking at double. -m On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Forrest W. Christian wrote: On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Tom Fanning wrote: What's so special about Digium cards that makes them this expensive? $4000 for a PCB is extortion IMO! $4K for a

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Pricing for DS3000P

2005-06-03 Thread Matt Klein
Unofficial: Digium guesses that their DS3 card will be $3k - $4k. -- tack on a k or two to be safe. Later this year is my guess... from what I heard. -m On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Nathan wrote: Does anyone have an estimate for the pricing on the DS3000P DS3 PCI card by Digium? How about a

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Pricing for DS3000P

2005-06-03 Thread Matt Klein
Agreed, those are the figures we were able to get from Digium... I'm still waiting for a confirmation, but I'm being safe with a $4k estimate.. timeframe wasn't given to me, but I was told this year (later this year). All of it, of course, unofficial. Hardware specs have already been

RE: [Asterisk-Users] What do you name yours

2005-05-11 Thread Matt Klein
Mine is named spike... On Thu, 12 May 2005, Paul Hales wrote: We bought one of those books on the worst cars ever made...every page has great names... PaulH -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Cotton Sent: Thursday, 12 May 2005 1:41 AM

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE410P does not fit in motherboard

2005-05-04 Thread Matt Klein
It's you. Get a 3.3v supported Motherboard. -or- Grab a Hacksaw. Others will post instructions. ;) On Wed, 4 May 2005, Daniel Salama wrote: I'm trying to install a TE410P on a Gigabyte motherboard (8S661FX) and I'm just noticing that the TE410P does not fit in the PCI slot. It seems as if the

RE: [Asterisk-Users] TE410P does not fit in motherboard

2005-05-04 Thread Matt Klein
Vice Versa. http://www.digium.com/index.php?menu=wildcard_te410p The TE405P is for 5v slots. To counter, there are, and I won't suggest them, ways to make the TE410P work in a 3.3v slot. This would basically entail cutting it to fit.. and has been proven to work, but it is not recommended by

RE: [Asterisk-Users] TE410P does not fit in motherboard

2005-05-04 Thread Matt Klein
Hey, I remember those commercials, too! On Thu, 5 May 2005, David Phelan wrote: [Oooops] Corect me if I am wrong, but the TE410P is for 5v PCI Slots.. I think you need to be using the TE405P (3.3V PCI) [/ooops] Got that back-to-front Maybe I should Have had the Scrambled Eggs instead of my

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Freak incidents, who's to blame?

2005-05-03 Thread Matt Klein
If you're going through a CLEC for your lines, they can probably set the Glare Preference to be You or the Telco. I'm not sure if the Baby Bells would add that preference option for you. -m On Tue, 3 May 2005, Eric Wieling aka ManxPower wrote: Ryan Courtnage wrote: Hello all, Everyone has

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Re: T1/DS1/ISDN PRI

2005-04-28 Thread Matt Klein
Max TNT's are pretty cheap they'll need to price it accordingly. On Thu, 28 Apr 2005, David Josephson wrote: Your reference picture is fine ... but note that Asterisk can be the TDM/VoIP gateway, particularly when Digium releases their DS3 card (644 voice channels!) working, a lot more

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Static and echo on PRI

2005-04-26 Thread Matt Klein
Mark, Call your upstream and ask for good echo can, to start, issue a trouble ticket regarding static and echo on your T1. -m On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Mark Johnson wrote: Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: On April 26, 2005 06:19 pm, Mark Johnson wrote: Does anyone have some suggestions on how to get rid

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Static and echo on PRI

2005-04-26 Thread Matt Klein
ask your upstream. On Wed, 27 Apr 2005, Mark Johnson wrote: Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: Try these things: Software: - don't play with gains on PRI or T1 unless you have echo or too loud/quiet. Static isn't caused by screwy gains and on digital circuits it technically shouldn't ever need to be

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Static and echo on PRI

2005-04-26 Thread Matt Klein
: Matt Klein wrote: ask your upstream. Not sure what you mean. This T1 is in good working order with a different system. Do you mean call the telco or Digium? Mark ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com

Re: [Asterisk-Users] ASTERISK PROGRAMER

2005-04-23 Thread Matt Klein
$4,172.38 USD and I'll programin anything you want for asterisk server. On Sat, 23 Apr 2005, Franz wrote: PLEASE CAN SOMBODY HELP ME PROGRAMIN AN VoIP ASTERISK SERVER Atentamente, Franz Schuverer Arrue GLOBAL GROUP, INC. www.telefoniaglobal.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel. (504) 221-4062 (Honduras Tel.

Re: [Asterisk-Users] ASTERISK PROGRAMER

2005-04-23 Thread Matt Klein
The funniest part is, he thought I was serious. I'd be dumb if I didn't at least charge $4,172.39 USD for the job. On Sat, 23 Apr 2005, Gary Stimson wrote: On Saturday 23 April 2005 19:23, Bob Goddard wrote: On Saturday 23 April 2005 19:13, Matt Klein wrote: $4,172.38 USD and I'll programin

RE: [Asterisk-Users] US$200 bounty for * paging feature

2005-04-21 Thread Matt Klein
cool. see, no need to fight anyone. you people are crazy. luf... On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com wrote: you did a great parody of him completly ignoring what I was saying and going off on something unrelated to what I say just to get MS bashing in. Gotta love people who

Re: [Asterisk-Users] US$200 bounty for * paging feature

2005-04-21 Thread Matt Klein
stop wasting my bandwidth plz On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com wrote: On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 22:14 -0500, Dan Perik wrote: Michael D Schelin wrote: Ok you guys enough. The debate will go on forever. Agreed! At the risk of wasting bandwidth myself Please, guys stop

RE: [Asterisk-Users] US$200 bounty for * paging feature

2005-04-20 Thread Matt Klein
fight fight fight fight! On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Race Vanderdecken wrote: Wow! What a great fight! Let me egg you guys on. Furthermore, (if you knew your history) MS had been doing funny things with DOS / and windows to make it difficult for other windowing systems and DOS clones to work with MS-DOS

Re: [Asterisk-Users] DS3000P - 20 E1 capacity on single card

2005-04-12 Thread Matt Klein
Kevin, Keep in mind that according to Wiki there are no DSP's on the board. -m On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In other words, a PCI-based co-processor would double the PCI bus bandwidth necessary. And with a latency-sensitive product like voice,

Re: [Asterisk-Users] DS3000P - 20 E1 capacity on single card

2005-04-12 Thread Matt Klein
Kevin, Mmm. Yep. -m On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: Matthew Boehm wrote: So, no hardware encoding on this beast? The announcement on the website makes no mention of transcoding, echo cancellation or toast-and-jam making, so at this time, no, there is no hardware transcoding

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Local Number Ports

2005-04-07 Thread Matt Klein
One of our local carriers charges 17 cents per ported DID MRC, no port/non recurring charges. I've seen in the neighborhood of $15 per 10 ported numbers as an LSR charge from other carriers NRC.. and as low as 5 cents MRC per Month. I've also seen cases with no MRC per DID per month, but an

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Discussion Forums provided by Digium

2005-04-04 Thread Matt Klein
uNF On Mon, 4 Apr 2005, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: The recent discussions about mailing lists vs. forums have resulted in Digium management deciding to offer a forum site on a provisional basis, to determine if it will benefit the community. You will find a brand-new set of phpBB forums at

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Is there a way to get inserted into an LEC's CLIDB? (fwd)

2005-03-23 Thread Matt Klein
- Yeah, we rocked the vote all right. Those little bastards betrayed us again. - Hunter S. Thompson on the 2004 election. -- Forwarded message -- Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 19:16:09 -0800 (PST) From: Matt Klein [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Is there a way to get inserted into an LEC's CLI DB?

2005-03-22 Thread Matt Klein
Verisign, CNAM http://www.verisign.com/products-services/communications-services/intelligent-database-services/cnam-calling-name-database/page_001662.html Look there. -m - Yeah, we rocked the vote all right. Those little bastards betrayed us

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Is there a way to get inserted into an LEC's CLIDB?

2005-03-22 Thread Matt Klein
NeuStar also offers CNAM db services, but VeriSign pays you for your cnam listings as they receive reciprocal compensation for their databases, probably charging rbocs, clecs etc per query.. I'm not sure about NeuStar or how they handle this, but I'm almost positive that they provide cnam

Re: [Asterisk-Users] STOP NOW not responding

2005-03-08 Thread Matt Klein
Try ps -auxww, find the process and kill it. Or, if you're on a system that supports killall, just killall asterisk. safe_asterisk should restart the * process automatically, or if you're not running safe_asterisk, then just start the process after you've killed it.. I have no idea why STOP

Re: [Asterisk-Users] PRI HDLC Abort (6) Errors

2005-03-05 Thread Matt Klein
ztcfg - works, too.. after a timing source change... power cycle works. - Yeah, we rocked the vote all right. Those little bastards betrayed us again. - Hunter S. Thompson on the 2004 election. On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Steven Critchfield wrote:

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Simulated dialtone like in other PBX

2005-02-20 Thread Matt Klein
from the console, show modules - Yeah, we rocked the vote all right. Those little bastards betrayed us again. - Hunter S. Thompson on the 2004 election. On Sun, 20 Feb 2005, Anton Krall wrote: That app_disa is new to me... Is there a list of

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Simulated dialtone like in other PBX

2005-02-20 Thread Matt Klein
And go here: http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+-+documentation+of+application+commands - Yeah, we rocked the vote all right. Those little bastards betrayed us again. - Hunter S. Thompson on the 2004 election. On Sun, 20 Feb 2005, Anton Krall

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Speech Recognition

2005-02-12 Thread Matt Klein
Agreed, Steve. Iq, Maybe it is for your voice, but speech to text is a long ways away from being as advanced as you think it is. Check out dragon speek, and see what it takes to train a voice... -m On Sun, 13 Feb 2005, Steve Underwood wrote: Iqbal wrote: Hi I dont know jack about speech

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Need help with perl script/agi for ringback

2005-02-06 Thread Matt Klein
kill the line breaks? On Sun, 6 Feb 2005, taf taffey wrote: Hi, I'm trying to write a simple perl script that will run the following: Action: Originate Channel: local/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/r/n Exten: 1234 Context: callback Priority: 1 Extensions.conf exten = 500,1,agi,callback.pl callback perl script:

Re: [Asterisk-Users] 911 and Cops knocking on my door

2005-02-02 Thread Matt Klein
Try dialing 591-2079 and see if you're trying to make a call to 91-2079 instead of 591-2079. -m On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Andrew Niemantsverdriet wrote: Hi, I am quite new to asterisk so I am not sure what is needed to figure out this problem. If more information is needed and not provided I will

Re: [Asterisk-Users] 911 and Cops knocking on my door

2005-02-02 Thread Matt Klein
looks like an ignorepat problem on the first *number* (single) dialed (i.e., trying to ignore the number 9 on an outbound call.) try to make a call to 591-2079. - Yeah, we rocked the vote all right. Those little bastards betrayed us again. -

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Linksys PAP2 / RT31P2 + multiple G.729 calls

2005-02-02 Thread Matt Klein
of course it won't. neither can the ata. they're cheap, it was a licensing decision. i look forward to v2. -m On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Matthew Boehm wrote: Holy Crap I have just verified this! The linksys PAP2-NA will NOT SUPPORT 2 SIMULTANEOUS G729 CALLS! And I just got off the phone with some

Re: [Asterisk-Users] 911 and Cops knocking on my door

2005-02-02 Thread Matt Klein
yep, post your conf. On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, AJ Grinnell wrote: post your dialplan from extensions.conf On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:15:28 -0700, Andrew Niemantsverdriet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am quite new to asterisk so I am not sure what is needed to figure out this problem. If more information is

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Terrible inbound call quality vs. outbound

2005-02-01 Thread Matt Klein
Try voicepulse in a different area w/ 800 service. With 800 you can jump POPs. If you're stuck with local DID service w/ them, I feel sorry for you. I've seen several recent complaints, and have experienced my own problems, with voicepulse inbound service. They need to upgrade the POP

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Realtime Voicemail ...

2005-01-18 Thread Matt Klein
MySQL RealTime: Retrieve SQL: SELECT * FROM voicemail_users WHERE mailbox = '201' AND context = 'default' There is no column 'context'. Add a column 'context' to your voicemail_users table, default value of 'default', make sure the column is filled with 'default' as a value. Or edit the source

Re: Fw: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco 7690 Voicemail Problem

2004-12-30 Thread Matt Klein
it. A longer term solution would be to boost the gain of whatever input you're using so that people don't have their phones turned up so loud. - Original Message - From: Matt Klein [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users

Re: Fw: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco 7690 Voicemail Problem

2004-12-30 Thread Matt Klein
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004, Paul A Brown wrote: Anyone? :-) - Original Message - From: Matt Klein [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 7:37 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco 7690 Voicemail Problem

2004-12-29 Thread Matt Klein
a faint scratching sound of your voice coming out of the speaker? or loud and clear? On Wed, 29 Dec 2004, Paul A Brown wrote: Happy New year to you all... I was wondering if anyone can help. I have a couple of 7690's working with the latest SIP image and they call

Re: [Asterisk-Users] OT - Originating Network identity

2004-12-26 Thread Matt Klein
focus on npa-nxx (area code-prefix) if the call is coming from a non-ported number, then http://telcodata.us/docs/queries.html may help you -- see the example files.. there are also a couple other sites out there.. but i've found this one to be my favorite thus far. -m On Sun, 26 Dec 2004, oi

Re: [Asterisk-Users] OT - Originating Network identity

2004-12-26 Thread Matt Klein
On Sun, 26 Dec 2004, Lyle Giese wrote: That's good to get a general idea, but number portability only tells you which carrier has the block. It does not let you know about specific numbers :-{ Lyle - Original Message - From: Matt Klein [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Asterisk Users Mailing

Re: [Asterisk-Users] OT - Originating Network identity

2004-12-26 Thread Matt Klein
: That's good to get a general idea, but number portability only tells you which carrier has the block. It does not let you know about specific numbers :-{ Lyle - Original Message - From: Matt Klein [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Ethernet Channel Bank idea

2004-12-16 Thread Matt Klein
Dec 2004, Greg Boehnlein wrote: On Wed, 15 Dec 2004, Matt Klein wrote: who said anything about a computer? :) computer, $$extra on both. may be less on the pm3 side due to resource needs. In the scenario I envision this being used in, there is no computer. The PM3 runs (On it's

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Ethernet Channel Bank idea

2004-12-16 Thread Matt Klein
instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations. - James Madison On Wed, 15 Dec 2004, Bob Knight wrote: On Wed, 15 Dec 2004, Matt Klein wrote: 3) good luck getting

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Ethernet Channel Bank idea

2004-12-15 Thread Matt Klein
Ethernet Channel Bank Hmm. Caught my attention for more than 34 hours, you win. I'm getting 24 port carrier access channel banks for $100, Digium 4 Port Cards for about $800 (T400P) a card.. Meaning a blended cost of ~$12.50 per channel NRC. I can mux up 96 channels for a cost of $12.50 per

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Ethernet Channel Bank idea

2004-12-15 Thread Matt Klein
by others. - I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations. - James Madison On Wed, 15 Dec 2004, Matt Klein

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Ethernet Channel Bank idea

2004-12-15 Thread Matt Klein
. - James Madison On Wed, 15 Dec 2004, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: On December 15, 2004 05:29 am, Matt Klein wrote: If you mention FXO, I must mention $100 will not buy you what I am talking about. I am talking FXS ONLY. You can't find an FXO channel bank for $100. FXS sure, FXS channel banks

[Asterisk-Users] Re: 12.50$ per port ???

2004-12-15 Thread Matt Klein
- From: Matt Klein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 11:19 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Ethernet Channel Bank idea Ethernet Channel Bank Hmm. Caught my

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Ethernet Channel Bank idea

2004-12-15 Thread Matt Klein
FXS vs FXO, listen. I really didn't mean to present that as a perspective, only a challenge to shoot down an inflated price model for FXS ports. If you mention FXO, I must mention $100 will not buy you what I am talking about. I am talking FXS ONLY. I am too, interested, in an Ethernet

Re: [Asterisk-Users] list broken again?

2004-12-15 Thread Matt Klein
?? list is working. -m - I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations. - James Madison On Wed, 15 Dec

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Ethernet Channel Bank idea

2004-12-15 Thread Matt Klein
of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations. - James Madison On Wed, 15 Dec 2004, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: On December 15, 2004 06:13 am, Matt Klein wrote: W/ T400P to Ether T400P Qty 1 (4 T1) $800 Carrier Access Qty 4 $400 Total $1200 Plus computer