Hello asterisk-users,
Sean
--
+---+
|VOIP= FreeWorldDial: 689482 VOIPBUSTER: thecivvie |
|GPG Key http://thecivvie.fastmail.fm/thecivvie.asc |
+---+
Strange things happen under the midnight sun
Hello Ronan,
Thursday, September 15, 2005, 10:13:13 AM, you wrote:
Hi Sean,
This is what I've got in my zaptel zonedata.c file for a small * box in
Dublin:
{ 18, ie, Ireland, { 400, 200, 400, 2000 },
{
/* Dialtone = 400//425//450 */
{ ZT_TONE_DIALTONE, 425 },
Hello asterisk-users,
Just curious if anyone has the indications for Ireland, tried
googling for it to no avail.
Sean
--
+---+
|VOIP= FreeWorldDial: 689482 VOIPBUSTER: thecivvie |
|GPG Key http://thecivvie.fastmail.fm/thecivvie.asc |
Hello Asterisk-Users,
I copied the speed-dial set at the wiki to my extensions_custom and
included it, the code is:
; Speed dial application. This will store 99 speed dials in the bins 01 - 99
; The database family is called speed and the varible is called spnum
;Storing 11 digit numbers
Hello Sean,
Sunday, August 28, 2005, 11:53:28 AM, you wrote:
Hello Asterisk-Users,
I copied the speed-dial set at the wiki to my extensions_custom and
included it, the code is:
; Speed dial application. This will store 99 speed dials in the bins 01 - 99
; The database family is called
Hello Sean,
Sunday, August 28, 2005, 1:38:42 PM, you wrote:
Hello Sean,
Sunday, August 28, 2005, 11:53:28 AM, you wrote:
Hello Asterisk-Users,
I copied the speed-dial set at the wiki to my extensions_custom and
included it, the code is:
; Speed dial application. This will store 99
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 04:38:59 -0800
cxpcman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You must have future vision :)
ok then go ahead and try. but don't expect too much .the voices will be
out of time .
Sadly I am aware of this now but ISDN is slow slow :)
Sean
--
Sean Rima
Gossamer Spider Web of Trust
On Sat, 27 Aug 2005 09:43:33 +0100
Sean Rima [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 04:38:59 -0800
cxpcman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You must have future vision :)
ok then go ahead and try. but don't expect too much .the voices will be
out of time .
Sadly I am aware
of sat modem do
you use etc (maybe we shoud take this offlist)
Sean
--
Sean Rima
Gossamer Spider Web of Trust http://www.gswot.org
Jabber/PSI [EMAIL PROTECTED]
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored
Hello Julius,
Saturday, August 27, 2005, 10:38:18 PM, you wrote:
RG384 - Gilat!
That is the one I was thinking of going for :)
Sean
--
+---+
|VOIP= FreeWorldDial: 689482 VOIPBUSTER: thecivvie |
|GPG Key
I live in a very rural area, BB access will never happen and the only
choice I have it Satellite. I seen from a post to this list that Gilat
sat modems are not recommended. Is this still the case or is there
another alternative?
Sean
--
Sean Rima
Gossamer Spider Web of Trust http://www.gswot.org
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 01:43:21 -0800
cxpcman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sean Rima wrote:
I live in a very rural area, BB access will never happen and the only
choice I have it Satellite. I seen from a post to this list that Gilat
sat modems are not recommended. Is this still the case
Eric Wieling aka ManxPower wrote:
Sean Rima wrote:
Eric Wieling aka ManxPower wrote:
Sean Rima wrote:
Does anyone have any experience of these, I have been offered one
and am
thinking of adding sticking it onto the back of my Asterisk box and
just
ignore the WAN port if possible, It would
Eric Wieling aka ManxPower wrote:
Sean Rima wrote:
Does anyone have any experience of these, I have been offered one and am
thinking of adding sticking it onto the back of my Asterisk box and just
ignore the WAN port if possible, It would be to stick my exisiting
phones onto the asterisk box
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
Sean Rima wrote:
Does anyone have any experience of these, I have been offered one and am
thinking of adding sticking it onto the back of my Asterisk box and just
ignore the WAN port if possible, It would be to stick my exisiting
phones onto the asterisk box
Sean
I
Does anyone have any experience of these, I have been offered one and am
thinking of adding sticking it onto the back of my Asterisk box and just
ignore the WAN port if possible, It would be to stick my exisiting
phones onto the asterisk box
Sean
--
Eric Wieling aka ManxPower wrote:
Sean Rima wrote:
Does anyone have any experience of these, I have been offered one and am
thinking of adding sticking it onto the back of my Asterisk box and just
ignore the WAN port if possible, It would be to stick my exisiting
phones onto the asterisk box
Is there anyway to prevent an extension from dialing certain codes. ie I
want to prevent extension 203 from dialing number which start with 00
087 086 etc
Sean
--
++
|VOIP: FreeWorldDial 689482 VOIPBuster thecivvie |
|GPG Key:
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On Thursday 18 August 2005 15:35, Sean Rima wrote:
Is there anyway to prevent an extension from dialing certain codes. ie I
want to prevent extension 203 from dialing number which start with 00
087 086 etc
You're thinking about it wrong.
Devices can only dial #s
Benjamin Lawetz wrote:
Just put 203 in his own context which reacts to those numbers, and then
include your normal context
[restrict]
Exten = _00.,1,goto(unauthorised,1)
Exten = _087.,1,goto(unauthorised,1)
Exten = _086.,1,goto(unauthorised,1)
Exten = unauthorised,1,Playback(invalid)
I was playing with using VOIPBUSTER and was testing their client, which
I think is SIP. So I added the only setup I could find for asterisk
which is iax2 but I found that the speech quality is poor compared to
the client and there is a delay of almost 1 second whereas their client
there is not a
Sean Rima wrote:
I was playing with using VOIPBUSTER and was testing their client, which
I think is SIP. So I added the only setup I could find for asterisk
which is iax2 but I found that the speech quality is poor compared to
the client and there is a delay of almost 1 second whereas
Sean Rima wrote:
Sean Rima wrote:
I was playing with using VOIPBUSTER and was testing their client, which
I think is SIP. So I added the only setup I could find for asterisk
which is iax2 but I found that the speech quality is poor compared to
the client and there is a delay of almost 1
John Fawcett wrote:
Sean Rima wrote:
Using the install instructions for [EMAIL PROTECTED], I setup a FWD account,
this I
tested using X-Lite and it works okay,
Nowever I cannot make calls to fwd using Asterisk, my log showes:
Aug 14 21:06:09 NOTICE[1324]: Registration of '689482
Sean Rima wrote:
Using the install instructions for [EMAIL PROTECTED], I setup a FWD account,
this I
tested using X-Lite and it works okay,
Nowever I cannot make calls to fwd using Asterisk, my log showes:
Aug 14 21:06:09 NOTICE[1324]: Registration of '689482' rejected:
Registration
Joseph wrote:
Easy and cheap.
Get two gateways AG-468 (each have 4 FXS ports) made by Atcom
http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Atcom
one is about 88/ea
I have two on the way and will let you know how it works.
I would be interested in knowing how these work as well
Sean
--
Using the install instructions for [EMAIL PROTECTED], I setup a FWD account,
this I
tested using X-Lite and it works okay,
Nowever I cannot make calls to fwd using Asterisk, my log showes:
Aug 14 21:06:09 NOTICE[1324]: Registration of '689482' rejected:
Registration Refused
Aug 14 21:06:59
Ok, I am going for [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the CentOS iso disk. Installed and
just
checking a few things out.
My other question is this, which I forgot to ask before. We have no
Broadband here and more than likely will never have, so I am just
looking at building Asterisk to handle inbound and
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
[ Subject changed so people looking at the list index will actually have
the minimal clue as to what this post is about ].
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 01:50:16PM +0100, Sean Rima wrote:
Ok, I am going for [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the CentOS iso disk. Installed and
just
Tom Rymes wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Sean Rima
Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2005 8:50 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] One more newbie question
Ok, I am going for [EMAIL PROTECTED
Michael Boger Jr wrote:
Sean,
What kind of hotel do you have? Some PMS vendors require the call accounting
and check-in interfaces to their system. I am not aware that asterisk
supports these serial interfaces.
No they have no call accounting etc as such everything is done manually.
I
I have a brief from a local hotel to build a PBX using Asterisk but they
want to use their exisiting telephones and wiring from an old PBX that
no longer works.
Basically, I can build the system but an looking for a card that will
allow for upto 20 extensions to be wired into the back of the PC.
Chad Osmond wrote:
To use the old phones and existing wiring you'll need some E1/T1 FXS
Channel banks and a T1/E1 Card. Each bank will handle 30/24 phones and
pipe them into a single E1/T1 connection.
You can connect up to 4 (or 8 soon from Sangoma) T1's per card. I really
like the Sangoma
Tom Hayden wrote:
Well, it's unlikely you're going to find a PCI card that can handle
twenty analog lines, however I suggest you look at purchasing a call
bank such as the adit 600. You then can link up your * server with
the call bank using a T1 card and control and route calls using that
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On Thursday 11 August 2005 08:34, Sean Rima wrote:
I have a brief from a local hotel to build a PBX using Asterisk but they
want to use their exisiting telephones and wiring from an old PBX that
no longer works.
Can you plug one of the phones into a REGULAR telephone
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On Thursday 11 August 2005 09:31, Sean Rima wrote:
They are standard phones but I also want them to have all the features
that Asterisk does provide, so I may build a bos for my house and show
them that as well
Standard phones can still do MWI (if they have a light
Tom Rymes wrote:
On Aug 11, 2005, at 10:35 AM, Sean Rima wrote:
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On Thursday 11 August 2005 09:31, Sean Rima wrote:
They are standard phones but I also want them to have all the features
that Asterisk does provide, so I may build a bos for my house and show
them
Tom Rymes wrote:
On Aug 11, 2005, at 11:49 AM, Sean Rima wrote:
Tom Rymes wrote:
On Aug 11, 2005, at 10:35 AM, Sean Rima wrote:
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
On Thursday 11 August 2005 09:31, Sean Rima wrote:
They are standard phones but I also want them to have all the
features
38 matches
Mail list logo
