it is NOT required that reverse DNS is setup. get your facts straight.
On 6/10/05, Neal Walton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday, June 10, 2005 3:16 AM, Andrew Kohlsmith
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 10 June 2005 04:08, Terry H. Gilsenan wrote:
Received: from source
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mark Musone
Sent: Monday, 13 June 2005 5:40 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ATTN: Keith - Seriously OT
it is NOT required
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Dave Cotton
Sent: Friday, 10 June 2005 5:29 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ATTN: Keith
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 16:00 -0400, list
On Friday 10 June 2005 04:08, Terry H. Gilsenan wrote:
Received: from source ([81.56.129.44]) by exprod5mx8.postini.com
([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 00:29:16 PDT
Your MTA claimed it was called SOURCE but rDNS tells the recipient MX
that it is called: mail.linuxautrement.com
I
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Andrew Kohlsmith
Sent: Friday, 10 June 2005 8:16 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] ATTN: Keith - Seriously OT
On Friday 10 June 2005 04:08, Terry H. Gilsenan
On Friday 10 June 2005 07:34, Terry H. Gilsenan wrote:
Your server your rules, however in this day of increasing trojan SMTP
engined boxes, you should expect to get les and less deliverability.
I fail to see how a reverse pointer that == forward record means a more
reliable message. How many
On Friday, June 10, 2005 3:16 AM, Andrew Kohlsmith
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 10 June 2005 04:08, Terry H. Gilsenan wrote:
Received: from source ([81.56.129.44]) by exprod5mx8.postini.com
([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 00:29:16 PDT
Your MTA claimed it was
