On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, Tobias Jönsson wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Peter Svensson wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Tobias Jönsson wrote:
No, PRI_CAUSE works great at least in 1.0.2, probably in the earlier
1.0 releases too. Busy() may play a busy tone to the caller instead of
signalling busy
Is it possible to make the telco send an busy signal when an incoming call are
supposed to dial a group which has all lines busy?
Since I will get many public phonenumbers into my E1 (from telco), it will be
sliced up into a few groups. There might be channels availible in the E1, but
not on
Hi,
-Original Message-
Is it possible to make the telco send an busy signal when an
incoming call are supposed to dial a group which has all lines busy?
Since I will get many public phonenumbers into my E1 (from
telco), it will be sliced up into a few groups. There might
be
Hi,
-Original Message-
You can set a PRI_CAUSE variable. See
http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk%20variab
le%20PRI_CAUSE
This only works in CVS-HEAD. For production use just run Busy() in
the dialplan.
Actually, we use this on 1.0.3 with BRI-STUFF.
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Eric Wieling wrote:
Florian Overkamp wrote:
You can set a PRI_CAUSE variable. See
http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk%20variable%20PRI_CAUSE
This only works in CVS-HEAD. For production use just run Busy() in
the dialplan.
It was added to Asterisk
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Eric Wieling wrote:
You can set a PRI_CAUSE variable. See
http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk%20variable%20PRI_CAUSE
This only works in CVS-HEAD. For production use just run Busy() in the
dialplan.
No, PRI_CAUSE works great at least in 1.0.2, probably in
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Tobias Jönsson wrote:
No, PRI_CAUSE works great at least in 1.0.2, probably in the earlier 1.0
releases too. Busy() may play a busy tone to the caller instead of
signalling busy so using PRI_CAUSE is much better in PRI or BRI
environment.
The behaviour of Busy() and
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Peter Svensson wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Tobias Jönsson wrote:
No, PRI_CAUSE works great at least in 1.0.2, probably in the earlier
1.0 releases too. Busy() may play a busy tone to the caller instead of
signalling busy so using PRI_CAUSE is much better in PRI or BRI