RE: [Asterisk-Users] Has anyone tried using a Sipura-3000 as an FXO device for *?

On Sat, 2004-07-31 at 17:43, Kevin Walsh wrote: > As I said, I don't have one of these yet. Do you happen to know what > the box would do if the dialplan said to route the call to <:@gw0> > and that port was already in use? You'd probably get a Fast Busy if dialing from the FXS port. If coming i

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Has anyone tried using a Sipura-3000 as an FXO device for *?

> Rich Adamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Kevin Walsh wrote: > > > You can apparently use the SPA-3000 dialplan to specify that the > > > call should go via its FXO port, without going via Asterisk. This > > > could be useful for emergency services. I don't have a SPA-3000 yet, > > > so I can't

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Has anyone tried using a Sipura-3000 as an FXO device for *?

Rich Adamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Kevin Walsh wrote: > > You can apparently use the SPA-3000 dialplan to specify that the > > call should go via its FXO port, without going via Asterisk. This > > could be useful for emergency services. I don't have a SPA-3000 yet, > > so I can't say what ha

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Has anyone tried using a Sipura-3000 as an FXO device for *?

> Wolfgang S. Rupprecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rich Adamson) writes: > > > Like *, it also has an internal dialplan, however understanding the > > > various interactions requires some experimentation, as each of the > > > interfaces seem to be considered a "gateway", and pa

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Has anyone tried using a Sipura-3000 as an FXO device for *?

Wolfgang S. Rupprecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rich Adamson) writes: > > Like *, it also has an internal dialplan, however understanding the > > various interactions requires some experimentation, as each of the > > interfaces seem to be considered a "gateway", and part of the

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Has anyone tried using a Sipura-3000 as an FXO device for *?

> > The box was truly targeted for the residential user where existing > > phones interface on one side, the pstn line on the other side, and > > the default call is sent to the voip interface. Disconnected (or > > failed) ethernet results in a relay flipping, tying the fxs directly > > to the fxo.

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Has anyone tried using a Sipura-3000 as an FXO device for *?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rich Adamson) writes: > Like *, it also has an internal dialplan, however understanding the > various interactions requires some experimentation, as each of the > interfaces seem to be considered a "gateway", and part of the dialplan > directs calls to gw0, gw1, gw2 (etc) which

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Has anyone tried using a Sipura-3000 as an FXO device for *?

8:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Has anyone tried using a Sipura-3000 as an FXO device for *? > On Tue, 2004-07-27 at 15:52, Carmi Weinzweig wrote: > > I am considering using Sipura-3000s as FXO devices for my * system. Has > > anyone tried them in tha

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Has anyone tried using a Sipura-3000 as an FXO device for *?

> On Tue, 2004-07-27 at 15:52, Carmi Weinzweig wrote: > > I am considering using Sipura-3000s as FXO devices for my * system. Has > > anyone tried them in that configuration? They interest me because they > > need no PCI slots and therefore no drivers. I would much prefer not to > > have any spe

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Has anyone tried using a Sipura-3000 as an FXO device for *?

Only for basic testing. By default, incoming pstn calls ring the fxs line. However, there is an option to disable that and apparently route the call to the voip system. There is apparently another option that involves a timeout, routing the call to * if the fxs doesn't answer within the timeout per

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Has anyone tried using a Sipura-3000 as an FXO device for *?

On Tue, 2004-07-27 at 15:52, Carmi Weinzweig wrote: > I am considering using Sipura-3000s as FXO devices for my * system. Has > anyone tried them in that configuration? They interest me because they > need no PCI slots and therefore no drivers. I would much prefer not to > have any special kerne

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Has anyone tried using a Sipura-3000 as an FXO device for *?

I have a Sipura-3000 and am hoping to use it to provide FXS/FXO ports for my Asterisk box. I don't have it working well yet but I blame that on my inexperience with Asterisk. Some configuration examples are available at

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Has anyone tried using a Sipura-3000 as an FXO device for *?

I am most interested in using it for incoming calls. Have you tried that yet? /carmi On Jul 27, 2004, at 5:30 PM, Rich Adamson wrote: I am considering using Sipura-3000s as FXO devices for my * system. Has anyone tried them in that configuration? They interest me because they need no PCI slots

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Has anyone tried using a Sipura-3000 as an FXO device for *?

Yes, they seem to have many benefits. No PCI slots are used, echo issues related to mainboards are eliminated, no interrupt sharing/dropping issues, the list goes on. My SPA-3000 was ordered last week and should be here any day now. Once I do some testing on it I'll be sure to write a "review" com

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Has anyone tried using a Sipura-3000 as an FXO device for *?

> I am considering using Sipura-3000s as FXO devices for my * system. Has > anyone tried them in that configuration? They interest me because they > need no PCI slots and therefore no drivers. I would much prefer not to > have any special kernel requirements for my system. In the process of do

[Asterisk-Users] Has anyone tried using a Sipura-3000 as an FXO device for *?

I am considering using Sipura-3000s as FXO devices for my * system. Has anyone tried them in that configuration? They interest me because they need no PCI slots and therefore no drivers. I would much prefer not to have any special kernel requirements for my system. /carmi __