On 6/7/05, Michael Graves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 11:17:20 -0600, Colin Anderson wrote:
>
> >
> >http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1812887,00.asp
> >
> >Specifically, his assertion that ISP's would sniff traffic and block, say,
> >the SIP port. You could play wack-a-mole
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 11:17:20 -0600, Colin Anderson wrote:
>
>http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1812887,00.asp
>
>Specifically, his assertion that ISP's would sniff traffic and block, say,
>the SIP port. You could play wack-a-mole with port numbers, no?
>
>Also a community based, Freenet style o
Unfortunately I believe there is a lot of truth to it. The speed in
which 911 legislation took effect is no coincidence and you don't see
the big telcos complaining about it. He's right about the price issue
too. Do you see how much big providers charge for VoIP service?
MARK.
Colin Anders
Of Brian Litzinger
> Sent: Monday, 6 June 2005 7:57 PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] OT: Please comment on Dvorak's troll
>
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 03:03:49PM -0600, Colin Anderson wrote:
> > The Slashdot
On 6/6/05, Colin Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm just wondering if anyone in the community has considered "what if" and
> what would be a meaningful response, either technologically, legally, or
> socially. Encryption comes to mind. Also, Dundi's RFC perhaps addresses some
> of these issu
e "bad" ISP's play wack-a-port.
Just musing.
-Original Message-
From: Dan Littlejohn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 1:34 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] OT: Please comment on Dvorak's
The guy named himself after a keyboard (his pen name) and I have not
finished one of his articles in a while.
He is selling advertising though shock articles. Here is another gem.
http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:qtQlMzEk9AYJ:linux.slashdot.org/article.pl%3Fsid%3D05/02/25/162243%26tid%3D109%2
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1812887,00.asp
Specifically, his assertion that ISP's would sniff traffic and block, say,
the SIP port. You could play wack-a-mole with port numbers, no?
Also a community based, Freenet style of encryption implementation for
"free" VoIP traffic would address
