It's correct that neither the SRV lookup is handled correctly or
completely, nore is there in standard distro a way to register with the
proxy for a domain, if those names differ.
ok. let's fix that.
It wasn't a difficult task to change this.
If there is interest I might release the patch
have you set
srvlookup = yes ;Enable http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-DNS+SRVDNS SRV
lookups on calls
in your sip.conf file?
yes.
[ i consider an A RR for a domain name pointing to the right proxy
server more of a coincidence than deliberate configuration. how do you
otherwise express
This issued has been discussed few weeks ago into great depth.
Look into May/June 04 archive!
i have indeed looked into archives (wiki, googled using tabs, asked my
barber) and what have been discussed were SRV records for outgoing
calls.
the same seems not to work for REGISTER.
jasko
Jasminko Mulahusic wrote:
This issued has been discussed few weeks ago into great depth. Look
into May/June 04 archive!
i have indeed looked into archives (wiki, googled using tabs, asked my
barber) and what have been discussed were SRV records for outgoing
calls.
the same seems not to
It's correct that neither the SRV lookup is handled correctly or
completely, nore is there in standard distro a way to register with the
proxy for a domain, if those names differ.
It wasn't a difficult task to change this.
If there is interest I might release the patch for this as part of
Karl Brose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is also the option of expanding, or better redesigning, the [peer]
sections with proper and logical configuration options
and adding a register=yes flag.
I would prefer to see a register = yes directive in the type = peer
sections of both sip.conf and
Kevin Walsh wrote:
Karl Brose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is also the option of expanding, or better redesigning, the
[peer] sections with proper and logical configuration options and
adding a register=yes flag.
I would prefer to see a register = yes directive in the type =
peer
And when can we expect a patch from you for this? :P
bkw
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Walsh
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 11:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] RE: is srv lookup being
Senad Jordanovic wrote:
Kevin Walsh wrote:
Karl Brose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is also the option of expanding, or better redesigning, the
[peer] sections with proper and logical configuration options and
adding a register=yes flag.
I would prefer to see a register = yes directive in the
Registering with a provider with a register=yes in the [peer] section is
convenient for small installations when only one user is registering
with that domain since all the info usually is there already (username,
secret, host,...), but what if you have 20, 50, 100 users or accounts to
On Tuesday 06 July 2004 15:33, Karl Brose wrote:
Registering with a provider with a register=yes in the [peer] section is
convenient for small installations when only one user is registering
with that domain since all the info usually is there already (username,
secret, host,...), but what if
brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] forgot to quote some context above:
And when can we expect a patch from you for this? :P
Shortly after Asterisk gets a proper 1.0 stable release. :P
--
_/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/
_/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/_/ _/ K e v i n W a l
On 12:33 PM 7/6/2004, Karl Brose wrote:
Registering with a provider with a register=yes in the [peer] section is
convenient for small installations when only one user is registering
with that domain since all the info usually is there already (username,
secret, host,...), but what if you have 20,
And when can we expect a patch from you for this? :P
I'd like to see this too and be willing to do this under GPL. Is that
good enough?
-wolfgang
--
Wolfgang S. Rupprechthttp://www.wsrcc.com/wolfgang/
openbsd asterisk http://www.wsrcc.com/wolfgang/ftp/asterisk-openbsd35.patch
Wolfgang S. Rupprecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And when can we expect a patch from you for this? :P
I'd like to see this too and be willing to do this under GPL. Is that
good enough?
Apparently not, which is a pity and is it's probably a barrier to a
lot of submissions and extra work.
15 matches
Mail list logo
