[Asterisk-Users] Re: {SPAM?} Asterisk VIA SSH Tunnels

2004-10-16 Thread Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
Chris Travers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Now, TCP connections will probably be interrupted in any case if your IP address changes, but that is the nature of the protocol. That's why I use a tunnel. All TCP connections are bound to the address of the tunnel end point, which doesn't change. So

[Asterisk-Users] Re: {SPAM?} Asterisk VIA SSH Tunnels

2004-10-15 Thread Aidan Van Dyk
Tom Ivar Helbekkmo wrote: Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: And how many routers and firewalls out there do support OpenVPN? Do Cisco routers support it? Neither I, nor anyone else here, seems to be saying that OpenVPN is a replacement for IPsec. There's

[Asterisk-Users] Re: {SPAM?} Asterisk VIA SSH Tunnels

2004-10-15 Thread Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
Aidan Van Dyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It works. I've done it. Tunnel 0.0.0.0/0 through IPSEC. Don't use AH. Make sure you're local networking is set up to use the extruded address that goes through your IPSEC tunnel. Wow. That's a pretty cool hack. I think I may have to try that...

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: {SPAM?} Asterisk VIA SSH Tunnels

2004-10-15 Thread Chris Travers
Tom Ivar Helbekkmo wrote: Aidan Van Dyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It works. I've done it. Tunnel 0.0.0.0/0 through IPSEC. Don't use AH. Make sure you're local networking is set up to use the extruded address that goes through your IPSEC tunnel. Wow. That's a pretty cool hack. I think I